No Frownland here…
Read More...The Angels broke out the disco ball in the clubhouse, and why not? That was quite a party.
Mike Trout, the guest of honor, became the youngest player in American League history to hit for the cycle. Josh Hamilton, the birthday boy, enjoyed two rounds of serenades from the crowd. The Angels posted their most lopsided victory of the season, a 12-0 rout of the Seattle Mariners.
The fans even went home with party favors — Mike Trout pint glasses, in honor of a player of ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.4951 seconds, 173 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 1 of 2 pages
1 2 >I don't want to know how this DNA gets passed to their teammates.
With that type of science logic, Phil Rogers must be campaigning for a seat as a science advisor for Romney.
Why Jeter over Cano?
I was thinking this was some type of joke that I'm missing, but Pierzynski is having a pretty good year(nearly Yadier good, without the defense of course) still not remotely on par with Trout's year but still a good year.
Cano's only better because Jeter made him so silly.
Shouldn't he win it every year then? Or does his leadership only work in certain seasons?
I don't want to know how this DNA gets passed to their teammates.
I hope they at least get gift baskets.
Trout - 8.9 WAR, 1st place
Hamilton - 3.5, 14th place
Rios - 3.2, 16th place
A.J.- 2.3, 39th place
Jeter - 1.9, 54th place
That's WAR among batters only. Factor in pitchers and everyone but Trout drops. Jeter drops to 76th
I can't stand baseball writers.
Trout has been - AMAZING. I watched him a lot last year (I had cable then and don't this year and I live in the blackout area so MLB.TV is of little help) and I was excited to see him develop in 2012. But, I didn't think he'd be an impact bat this year; I thought he could rack up 4-5 WAR - if he played - with about half coming from defense and half from hitting/baserunning.
I was wrong. Big time. He has been absolutely unreal, and no other player except Miggy has ANY seat at the MVP table this year. They just don't. And Cabrera is cowering at the kids table while the actual kid is sitting at the head of the table carving the turkey.
Trout's WAR advantage over Cabrera is pretty similar to the edge A-Rod had on Tejada in 2002 when Miggy won it. I agree with you but it would hardly be shocking to see the voters ignore it. My feeling is that seeing a guy like Reddick or Pierzynski win it with a big finish to the season would be a bit more "logical". At least then you can give the "they carried their team from the depths..." stuff whereas the vote for Cabrera is a more straightforward "best player" type vote.
But as of today Trout deserves if the Angels were 35-90. He's lapping the field in my opinion.
He's having a very good year, and he's been a good solid major league catcher for years. But seeing "MVP" and "Pirzynski" in the same sentence was jarring.
A gift basket?
9 WAR isnt "valuable" unless your team-mates play well too.
It's really hard to argue for anyone else...Trout has been the best hitter in the league *and* the best baserunner *and* the best centerfielder (I assume he's going to win the Gold Glove, right?). Then again, you don't have to look too far to find precedent of a player like that *not* winning the award--Matt Kemp last year, for example, even though his baserunning and defense are not as good as Trout's.
in what world is that not an mvp??
One of my favorite cards in M:TG.
I don't think you get that just for showing up.
For just laying there???
Absolutely. Without Cardinal blinders, I supported Lee over Pujols, he had a slightly better year, but it was close enough that the standings figured into it.
You do know that Braun was pretty comparable offensively, including baserunning to Kemp last year, that it was superficially the same player. War even rates them the same 7.7 vs 7.8. The Dodgers missed the playoffs, the Brewers didn't. It was close, in that situation the room for error is going to side with the player on the playoff team.
If I had to guess, it is because Cano has been in a huge slump during the Yanks recent poor play while Jeter has been killing the ball. Which is of course, a horrible reason.
If the MVP goes to someone other than Trout, which is insane, it pretty much has to go to Cano, Cabrera, or Verlander. No one else in the league is close per fWar except Felix, who is on a shitty team. bWar has a bunch of pitchers not too far behind, but none of them are going to have the storyline to push them to the front of the MVP ballot.
That is why Trout has to win, no one else is having a great year. Cano was, but this slump has put on track for merely a very good one. If he turns it on, he could finish with a justifiable MVP caliber season but there is no earthly way he gets all that close to Trout, who is giving A-Rod's rookie season a push.
Cabrera has been pretty darn good and he's in a pennant race, so maybe some big hits give him the storyline, but he's going to finish 2-3 WAR behind Trout too.
AL ROY
AL MVP
Gold Glove
Silver Slugger
AL Hank Aaron Award
I would give him all five. Are there other awards that I'm forgetting?
You do know that Braun was pretty comparable offensively, including baserunning to Kemp last year, that it was superficially the same player. War even rates them the same 7.7 vs 7.8.
I do know that, but WAR also says that they had about the same fielding value (Kemp being a bad CF and Braun being a good LF). The voters, on the other hand, gave Kemp a Gold Glove in CF and didn't give one to Braun. If you thought Kemp truly was the best defensive CF in the league last year, there's no excuse for not giving him the MVP.
Different voting pool, along with a different methodology for the votes. I think that quoting gold gloves doesn't really show the contemporary opinion. It can create a contemporary opinion, but all a player has to do to win a gold glove was to be voted on 3 or so ballots, while everyone else is getting one votes. Until the vote totals are published, I find it hard to believe that gold gloves represent contemporary viewpoint.
There is still a month of the season left, see where he is at at that point in time. If the vote was right now, it should be unanimous, and I suspect he will do very well (getting a handful of second/third place votes from the Detroit writers, Yankee writers and maybe the Rangers.
The last month of the season counts, and I would argue that in many voter minds, it counts double.
I'll take the guy who is least likely to kick me in balls when I show concern for his well being.
Slam Dunk Contest
Nobel Peace Prize
Oscar
Grammy
Gold medal for every high jumping, fast running, and swimming event. I've never actually seen him swim, but come on, he's a Trout.
Fair enough. I still think it's possible Trout doesn't win it, although I will be shocked if that happens, as there seems to be a lack of anyone else with a clear narrative.
So, no EGOT?
Long ago, around 1984, I got tickets to a hockey game specifically to see Gretzky, hoping to witness a transcendent performance, perfectly willing to root against my team. He scored 5 goals, the last one on a spin-a-rama; there were 18,000 dropped jaws for most of the night. I feel like this is where I'm headed with Trout.
If Trout appears in a scene on "Mad Men", I'm sure they'll give him an Emmy.
Tony Award? That's tough. Maybe a revival of "Damn Yankees"?
Unfortunately he doesn't look much like late-1960s ballplayers. If you pasted some serious eyebrows on him, he'd resemble Roger Freed, but I can't see how Roger Freed would be written into an episode of Mad Men.
If Trout doesn't win and Cano doesn't (assuming he doesn't crater), I will litter this board with whining and complaining the likes of which we haven't seen since the last Red Sox or Mets thread.
Normally I would be fine with Miggy, but Cano is a homegrown Yank who is just as deserving.
Ichiro
Lynn
Robinson (Frank and Jackie)
Teddy Ballgame
Joe DiMaggio
Dwight Gooden
Mark McGwire
An incomplete list I'm sure.
b-r puts Lynn at 7.1 WAR
For position players, the answer seems to be Dick Allen at 8.5 WAR followed by Benny Kauff at 7.8 (and he followed that with a 6.7) but that's Federal League. Ichiro at 7.5 then Lynn at 7.1.
On the pitching side the winner is Russ Ford of the 1910 Yanks with 10.6 followed by Fidrych with 9.3.
So yeah, Trout would seem to have an excellent shot at the modern record.
He can have the NL MVP too, he's that damn good.
One of the great overlooked rookie pitching seasons was Britt Burns in 1980. "Only" 15-13, but 238 IP at 143 ERA+. 6.7 WAR, easily the best in the league (among rookies, and for that matter, among all pitchers), he finished 5th in the ROY voting. He had more WAR than the 1st, 2nd, and 4th place finishers combined.
Page 1 of 2 pages
1 2 >You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.