Somebody dig up McLean Stevenson…it’s been renewed!
Read More...Larry Dierker, who has been a part of Major League Baseball in Houston as a player, manager and broadcaster for almost a half-century, will rejoin the team as a special assistant to new Astros president of business operations Reid Ryan, the team announced today.
“I’ll be doing some writing and will be a right-hand man for Reid, mostly in the area of public relations,” Dierker said. “I get the feeling that I will gravitate to the area ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.8663 seconds, 189 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 1 of 2 pages
1 2 >Every time I read projections like these, I'm amazed at how far Brett Wallace's value has dropped. I remember when he was drafted and the book on him was that he would hit. Now it looks like he's more of a league-average bat with no other secondary skills.
1 Brett Gardner 34
2 Carlos Lee 21
3 Mike Stanton 20
4 Kosuke Fukudome 19
5 Chris Young 18
6 Rick Ankiel 17
7 Chris Denorfia 15
8 Denard Span 14
9 Carlos Gomez 14
10 Michael Bourn 13
11 Peter Bourjos 13
FWIW Fangraphs also has Lee as a plus defender in 2011
Is that even physically possible?
I'd have to guess he got a skewed distribution of chances. Lot's of easy plays that look hard when zoned, either b/c of location, velocity (difference btw a fly/fliner/liner) or his slowness made easy plays look harder.
What order are we going in anyway?
Reverse of last year, I believe.
It looks like 2010 payroll descending.
He was teammates with Ike Davis for 3 years
He outhit Ike EVERY single year- his WORST year had him OPS higher than Ike's college career, Brett's college OPS was 1197, Ike's was 1015- same team same years
Ike was a 1B, Brett was a 3B...
Brett was drafted 13th overall, Ike 18th (And a recall hearing that was a reach)
Brett hit .337/.427/.530 his first pro season at age 21- between the midwest league and AA
Ike hit .256/.326/.326 his first pro season at age 21- in the New York Penn league
Ike reached #62 on BA's prospect list, Brett #27
and now Ike projects to 113, and Brett 97.
Basically after that age 21 year Ike has outplayed Brett in very possible way (except in staying healthy)
How does that happen?
1: Defense/Athleticism, Ike was always a better athlete/fielder- Brett played 3B when Ike played 1B simply because Ike throws left and hence CAN'T play any other IF position*- but in truth he always had better hands, better range than Wallace- who was never going to play 3B in the majors
2: Hitting: I think before age 22, Wallace really was a better hitter, and this is simply a case where Ike improved through ages 22 and 23 and Wallace basically didn't - I don't think there is anyway to predict/project that reliably.
*There were times back in the 1980s, where if the Mets had Keith Hernandez play 3rd, he would have played it better than whoever Davey Johnson was running out there... Ike is not THAT good, but he's got a clear defensive tool separation advantage on Wallace...
Probably a red flag that he was dealt three times before he even reached the big leagues. It was a game of Hot Potato, and Ed Wade lost.
Wow, his minor league numbers say so. .389 / .426 / .591 in 391 PA, with 24 steals and only 40 strikeouts. And only 60% of that was with the Lancaster JetHawks!
Not when you add in defense.
That second baseman is easy to root for - he's 5-5 which caused him not to make a lot of prospect lists going into last season.
Request for Brian Bixler, please.
Ahh yes, the Andy Marte Rule.
Where are you seeing the 2 position players? Altuve, if his D is avg or better, and you ignore his height, and...
Jed "Glassman" Lowrie?
Calling this team horrific is an insult to horrific teams. They were horrific when they had Pence and Bourn. No it's a freak show.
Edit: Coke to Der K 2
1) Would a major league manager really allow him to go 33/21 in SB/CS?
2) He hit .389 in A+/AA in 391 PA as 21yo last year, with 26/40 K/BB ratio. What are the odds that he really takes a leap forward this year? Or does the 5/29 K/BB ratio in the majors just out weight all those minor league numbers?
If the Astros trade Wandy Rodriguez and Brett Myers for prospects, the rotation will be really ugly.
1) Would a major league manager really allow him to go 33/21 in SB/CS?
2) He hit .389 in A+/AA in 391 PA as 21yo last year, with 26/40 K/BB ratio. What are the odds that he really takes a leap forward this year? Or does the 5/29 K/BB ratio in the majors just out weight all those minor league numbers?
I think if you're playing in MLB at 5'5", you're going to have to show you can do some damage to a fastball down the middle of the plate before you start getting walks.
He needs to generate at least 7-10 HR/triples, and 20 or so doubles to keep them honest. If the .060 ISO from last year persists, he's not going to make it.
2009 projection: 275/333/424
Rest of Year 2009 (after trade): 264/323/392
2010 projection: 246/314/385
2011 projection: 261/324/414
ZiPS never really saw Wallace becoming a good hitter at a position he could play and so far, it hasn't been wrong.
I think they'd have to get rid of Wandy and Myers (otherwise the SP is too cromulent), but that should be coming soon.
3 years in AAA, not once did he reach league average, 1410 AAA PAs, and I'm guessing his mles work out to a 60-70 OPS+
against that you have 213 MLB PAs at a 111 OPS+ (most during his age 27 season), it may have helped a little that he was literally never allowed to bat against lefties...
The most obvious comparison is the 2003 Tigers.
The 2002 Tigers went 55-106. Then they got rid of their 2002 All-Star (Robert Fick, of all people) thinking that Dmitri Young could play left field and Dean Palmer was healthy enough to DH every day. They got rid of recent All-Star Damion Easley and replaced him with recent near-ROY Warren Morris. They gave the exciting prospect Eric Munson the 3B job and the not-even-close-to-ready Omar Infante the SS job. They got rid of their #1 starter (Mark Redman), after already trading their other two proven starters (Jeff Weaver and Brian Moehler) mid-season.
The starting rotation (Maroth, Bonderman, Cornejo, Bernero, Knotts) had a total of 56 career starts as of Opening Day, and only Bonderman and Cornejo were any sort of prospect.
And they did take a run at the 1962 Mets.
The Astros lineup looks a lot like that Tigers ilneup, with Carlos Lee playing the role of Dmitri Young, and no obvious Bobby Higginson in sight. But the rotation, that's a little better.
Let the J.A. Happ 20-loss watch commence!
Bogusevic's career path in the minors isn't exactly normal. That might change some of the interpretation--or maybe not. Bogusevic was picked in the first round as a pitcher and worked his way up to AA as a starting pitcher. The Astros then changed his position to outfield, and his first couple of minor league seasons had to be a big transition, since he hadn't batted as a position player since he was in college. The Astros pushed him to AAA rather quickly because of his late age. If his performance is based on the typical 27 year old minor league outfielder, that may not fit, since his late age for AAA is due to the career change. I would like to see Bogusevic succeed at least as a platoon RFer because it's fun to watch him throw out runners.
Bixler was removed from the 40 man roster when the Astros traded for Lowrie.
You must have a different definition of "exciting prospect" than me, while formerly a first round pick he'd already dropped off of BA's lists 2 year before, I think it was more the 2003 Tigers saying, oh well we have some guys at Toledo who are not terrible, Munson, Monroe, Infante, lets pay them league minimum and throw them against the wall, we're gonna loss 100 again anyway...
boe-guh-SEV-ic
I'm pretty surprised that Altuve projects so well, given that his minor-league numbers were mostly in high-octane environments and relied in decent part on sky-high BABIPs. I'm also surprised that Wandy projects so poorly, considering that he's been at least 0.29 below that ERA in each of the last four seasons. I suppose it's a combination of age and a concerning FIP last season.
Or some reliever lucks into 25 innings of goodness or Wandy is Wandy.
The 2002 lineup was absolutely awful before Crawford was called up in mid-July, but it did include Randy Winn. On the occasions that Winn didn't start, it was
C Toby Hall or John Flaherty
1B Steve Cox
2B Brent Abernathy
3B Jared Sandberg or Russ Johnson
SS Chris Gomez
LF Jason Tyner
CF Jason Conti
RF Ben Grieve
DH Greg Vaughn
Page 1 of 2 pages
1 2 >You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.