You know it’s early in the awards season when…
Read More...Most Valuable Player: National League
3. Carlos Gomez, CF, Brewers: Season Stats: .367/.418/.644, 5 HR, 10 RBI, 4 SB
Prior to 2012, Gomez’s career-high in home runs was eight, and his .250/.305/.463 line last year represented career-highs in all three categories, so he is set up for a larger fall than most here. Still, one has to recognize how valuable he has been so far this season. After all, the reason Gomez didn’t wash out of the majors ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.2144 seconds, 148 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Dock Ellis on AcidWhat a coincidence! I pulled something totally unsupportable (and probably untrue) out of my ass today, too!
No group of newspaper writers "randomly" selected has ever been or ever will be 75%+ Republican.
Maybe a three-sub eating marathon, although I'm guess that undersells the Fat Prince's ability to hog the hoagies.
No, just the people who voted for Mitt Romney.
I actually thought they greatly resembled 'liberal' Huff Post commenters.
"No, you Democrats are so stupid."
It's not really a big deal though, I only have to put up with this every two years for the rest of my life. By all means, please let it infect areas of my life I can normally steer clear from it.
Oh c'mon...as soon as the MVP race became 'a smug victory for the powers of righteousness and everything that makes this country great', there were going to be comparisons.
Right, but the comparison should be between "people can argue convincingly using factual evidence" and "people who cannot argue convincingly using factual evidence". Granted, at the candidate level, there seems to be a dramatic gap for major races (although not as large as the left would make it out to be), I would guess the voters are a mixed bag and confounded by a large swath of religious Republicans who think that "believing in God" is incompatible with "believing in data". Otherwise, there are probably equal number of mildly to non-religious people who don't believe in data on both sides.
And really the criticism should be directed towards "people who don't believe in data", regardless of their political persuasion.
Eh, according to the Mayan calendar, we've all only got another month to live anyway.
I've already started looting.
P.S. @ Gonfalon, you must be the creator of Hi & Lois 'cause you made me laugh with your comment.
Ah, politics, the opportunity for the one-tenth of people who profess complete distaste for politics to feel superior to the other 90% who consider it worth caring about.
Ah, politics, the opportunity for people like me to feel superior to the one-tenth of people who profess distaste for politics who feel superior to those who do care about it.
Ah, politics...
I think you mistake people's honest and perfectly understandable disdain for you as indicative as something broader that doesn't really exist.
Especially the sports talk radio guys - they go out of their way to advertise their stance, on or off air.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.