I estimate only 10-12 Primates care about straight NBA players, but with our own thread, we won’t detract from what this site is really about: gay NBA players and craft beer.
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.6017 seconds, 183 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 15 of 24 pages
‹ First < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > Last ›In this case, I'm talking about Mitch Richmond.
Edit: I'm probably setting my replacement level bar way too high, given that a replacement level team is a 10-15 win team. Its unfair to set the HOF bar at 20-30 wins added, which we've seen as reserved for inner-circle guys.
Edit 2: Dear god did the Kings ever draft badly in the late 80s and early 90s. I know that was a dreadful era for talent evaluation....but still..
He was 17th win shares and 11 in PER in 96-97, so he has a strong case that one season.
Is Richmond the worst player ever to make 6 straight all-star games? He scored a lot of points, but was a pretty limited player otherwise, which is a common type of player to be overrated by the media and casual fans. He was at least a pretty efficient scorer for a guard who shot as much he did.
Edit: coke to smileyy
Yep, thanks for the correction. The point stands, though: he was basically a fringe all-star for a few seasons (started one) and had two very good college seasons. I can't imagine how that would make him a hall of famer.
Good point. Guess I haven't thought about when he'd be back (which is when, btw?). Also, the trade deadline being this week just totally snuck up on me.
Will be interesting to see whether he can kick the Indy offense up a notch at all. If they could just get up around league average they might be a real threat to Miami.
I don't think there's a ton of risk here because they're main guys are young and/or in their prime. I think their issue is more about if paying these guys is going to get more than they can handle, and the Bledsoe/Granger deal helps that a lot. I'm assuming Hibbert will play better, which leaves one real hole on the team, and because of how flexible they are with Hill and George either Granger or Bledsoe could fill it.
Bledsoe I think is more valuable because of his contract, but let's not forget that Granger had a really good year last year. He also makes them really, really tall.
Paul George has played much better at SF than at SG so far this year, but perhaps that's a sample-size mirage? In theory, he and Granger can be your wings next to Hill, and Indiana should continue to play great defense while possibly improving offensively.
They can always deal Granger in the offseason if he ends up not fitting as well as they hope.
Yeah, that's part of what I meant but wasn't clear about.
I'm under the impression that David West supplies a lot of essential spacing and passing to the team, and while he's not old, he's not young either.
Agree. The bottom line is that it's really hard to put together a contender unless you have a steal (from a financial/cap standpoint) on your team. This is either a pre-FA star, or a super-duper star worth a lot more than the max. And obviously the former (which right now, Indy has in George) is a ticking clock. I'm not really sure what Indy is supposed to do here though -- the other problem with an ensemble team as opposed to a stars-and-scrubs team is that it's just hard to upgrade since you don't have black holes eating minutes.
BTW, I don't want them to trade for J-Smoove.
I agree that Smith does not make sense for Phoenix. Re-signing him is going to close up a lot of cap space for anyone who acquires him, so you better either have a bigger star already in place or a steady supporting cast around him that will help define his role.
Responding a few days after you said this, but I was just catching up on the podcast and I caught this one today. That was from the Aussie guy, right? He seems like the one who is most likely the to make a puzzling (to use your word) point. The other 3 main guys I think are really solid.
I see what you did there.
There's certainly no shame in competing, even if you're not contending. This is a business after all. What does it take for Indiana to be a title contender?
Posit: Any of the top 4 teams in each conference would become at title contender by acquiring Kevin Garnett.
Clippers. 6th in ORTG; 7th in DRTG. Third-best player in the league, another top 10-20 guy, and a good bench.
I agree with NJ, the Knicks with KG are a title contender. Agree on Memphis. I think he would be more than a marginal gain for Indiana. He definitely improves the chances for the Clips and Bulls. I don't think even with KG that the Nets would be title contenders (unless Williams and Wallace instantly reverted to the peak forms).
Fair enough. I'm convinced. I had them on the line in my head anyway and I suppose they're about even with SA and OKC in the West if they stay healthy.
Can't find it right now (ugh) but someone on another forum posted a chart of threes per game verse fts per game. Extrapolating from the chart, you'll see more average threes per game than FTs in a couple more years, if things continue how they are.
Chart of three pointers attempted per game verse free throws attempted per game. Extrapolating from the chart, you'll see more average threes per game than FTs in a couple more years, if things continue how they are.
At least they're only 4 games out of the playoffs!
vucevic was never getting out of collins' doghouse, anyway, so what he's doing in orlando is not entirely relevant to what he would be doing here.
and iguodala isn't exactly tearing it up with denver, either. his PER is 7th among players in their rotation, and 2 others (jordan hamilton and corey brewer) have essentially been his equal.
Page 15 of 24 pages
‹ First < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > Last ›You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.