A little old, but I finally have time today to do this stuff. (h/t Roberto)
• Title: “Wonderful Ignorance”; subtitle: “The Past Is Always Going To Be With Us”
• Bill discusses SABR’s beginnings. It was smaller, allowing for more personal interaction, and more populated by “eccentrics”. He reminds us that founder Bob Davids was reluctant to publish more than one article every two years about statistical analysis in the SABR Journal. He says that of SABR’s 70 members at the time, only himself, ...
Login to Join (2 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 0.5252 seconds, 80 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 2 of 2 pages
< 1 2There would obviously be some time required to learn the specifics of the game, but the players of the 1870s simply wouldn't have that big of an advantage. They were by and large learning as they went too.
But it's entirely possible that cricketers (particularly 20/20 players) would adjust more quickly to the conditions of 1870 baseball. Don't know. I do know that we were often short of gloves when I was growing up so I played a lot of baseball with no glove. I don't think it would be that tough to find elite players who could play without a glove. Besides, as far as I know there's nothing in the 1870 rules preventing the use of gloves.
1870s would demolish the kids over a series.
Page 2 of 2 pages
< 1 2You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.