Sounding more like Bats Battaglia than Joey Bats…
Read More...“I think it’s a cheap shot and uncalled for to say something like that without having some sort of evidence to back it up,” Bautista said Friday in the visitor’s clubhouse at Fenway Park. “Comments and articles like that is what sometimes makes us wonder what’s the true intention of somebody that’s in the media. It blows my mind that somebody would just go out there and do something like that, and write an article where you’re ...
Login to Join (2 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.4731 seconds, 131 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 4 of 4 pages
< 1 2 3 4Nobody's optimistic about the current team. But your time horizon is silly. You're omarsblackcloud, right? The guy who hates everything?
And that's funny, coming from a guy who doesn't bother to post any remotely detailed thinking on the Mets (or any aspect of the game--if I'm wrong, please feel free to favor us with a copy and paste of one example of real thought you've given to the game prior to this. One). And by that I mean, literally, ever. You have nothing to say but, by god, you're going to say it, over and over and over again.
You have nothing to say at all about the team, you never post anything of substance (morbid curiousity reveals you haven't written a post longer than one line in this entire thread), but choose instead to follow the path of the gutless heckler with nothing to offer but unpleasantness from the cheap seats.
Your entire contribution to date in the prospect thread was the single word "baseless", where you evinced more of these stalkery qualities where you follow around posters who aren't particularly positive about the team's prospects and, instead of offering a valid and constructive opinion telling us why you're optimistic, merely catcall.
Talk about a negative, depressing presence.
Sorry to disappoint, stalker. I can't help you.
The projection is almost funny, though, coming from a guy who doesn't bother to post any remotely detailed thinking on the Mets (or any aspect of the game--if I'm wrong, please feel free to favor us with a copy and paste of one example of real thought you've given to the game prior to this. One). And by that I mean, literally, ever. You have nothing to say but, by god, you're going to say it, over and over and over again.
I agree with the general point about the payroll-- it's really difficult to project what's going to happen going with the team, because I don't think anyone has a clue about what the budget situation's going to be. But that cuts both ways-- you can't state with absolute certainty that the Mets are going to suck in 2017, because you're as in the dark about the budget as the rest of us. This was a good package coming back for Dickey-- I think if you read the threads leading up to the Myers deal, you'll see that no one thought the Mets could get anywhere near an A-rated prospect for Dickey, let alone 2. Syndergaard's been compared to Wheeler, and Wheeler straight up for Beltran was considered a good deal (Beltran was a rental, and a midseason deal, so not apples-to-apples). Getting him back along with a nearly-ready, good-hit, good-field catcher is a win for the organization long-term. And Becerra's not a bad lottery ticket, even if the odds are bad.
There's currently a lot of pitching talent in the system. If d'Arnaud and Flores develop, along with Tejada, Davis, and Wright, that is a solid and fairly cheap core.
Of course, d'Arnaud is not Myers. But this does show that ML GMs valued Dickey more than a lot of people on BTF thought they did, in part because the particulars of his situation provide a chance at getting ace-level performance at a sub-market rate.
And Wakefield and Charlie Hough's career WP rate were three to four times Dickey's rate this year. Thole had a really high rate of passed balls in non-Dickey starts. He lead the league in 2011 in PB's while only catching 133 innings of Dickey.
He's a baaaad catcher.
What explains Thole's performance in the non-Dickey innings?
You know, Thole may have something to do with that.
And it skyrocketed when catching Dickey! The same thing happened to Mike Nickeas. I have no opinion on either man's catching ability, but it's pretty clear that catching the knuckleballer was trickier for them than catching anyone else on the Mets' staff.
Dickey set a knuckleballer record for K/BB. He's good. He isn't wild.
I really don't understand what tshipman is after here. Is he still mad about the Buster Posey comparison?
Yes, quite clearly catching the knuckleball was tricky for them. However, we have ample evidence that Thole is a bad catcher even when he's not catching Dickey. We would expect bad catchers to struggle at catching the knuckleball.
In addition, Dickey doesn't throw a typical knuckler. It doesn't float unpredictably, right? Like that was the whole key to his success? Being able to control it?
No. My point is that WAR for catchers measures them poorly. dWAR is especially bad. All the stuff about Dickey is mostly a sideshow, where someone hypothesized that Thole was getting some kind of kuckleballer credit for his catching.
It's sort of obvious that a guy who leads the league in most years in PB's is giving up more than one run a season on runners advancing--especially when he can't throw.
Where the fuck did I say anything about the Mets sucking in 2017?
I wrote
I can't tell you how much I loathe this shit, where instead of actually bothering to discuss the issues at hand (and with the Mets, those issues aren't always particularly pleasant), someone just makes up whatever crap best serves the nonsensical insults they're chucking around.
Where was the nonsensical insult? (aside from pointing out the obvious truth about the handle-switching-- I don't really care about it one way or the other, but when someone notices, don't insult them for it)
AA is trying to set some sort of record for catchers churned through in a year. We used to make fun of his right-handed-reliever fetish, but it seems he's moved on. I expect to see Mike Nickeas traded for, I dunno, Jason Phillips.
For single seasons, Playing for the NYM, From 1991 to 2012, Played 81 games at RF, (requiring WAR_bat>=-15), sorted by most recent date
Alderson's first year was cheering in that regard, in that Sandy had the knack for the opposite, for finding backups and role players that instead of sucking the life out of the team, might at least chip in 1 win/500 PAs. That doesn't matter much on a 75 win team, but it's still better than watching Mike Jacobs man first base.
For single seasons, Playing for the NYM, From 2005 to 2012, Played 10 games at C, 1B, 2B, 3B, SS, LF, CF, RF or DH, (requiring WAR_bat<=0), sorted by most recent date
When I read this, I had the same response as Arbitol Dijaler. No team would ever target a season so far away in its planning. Although I suppose that is more likely to be the Mets' window, only because it is so far away as to be completely unknowable.
The 2008 Mariners, who had neither Thole nor Mike Nickeas on them, allowed 14 passed balls, 8 coming in Dickey's 112.1 IP. That was Kenji Johjima, Jamie Burke (?), and Jeff Clement. I think Clement was a pretty bad catcher; I don't know anything about the either two. Maybe they were all bad, too.
Even if Thole and Nickeas and Johjima and Mirabelli and Pocoroba and Sundberg were all awful defensive catchers (Sundberg won six Gold Gloves), it's still fairly obvious that catching the knuckleball caused them to allow more PB than they would have otherwise. Maybe they were bad, but they weren't as bad as their PB totals indicate. There DOES need to be a PB adjustment for them.
His is a fast knuckleball - possibly the fastest knuckler ever. But it still darts unpredictably. If it didn't, it wouldn't be a knuckleball. That's what the pitch does. Dickey can hit the strike zone with it, but that's a much bigger target than the catcher's glove.
I really am surprised that this is even a discussion. Anyway, you say that there's "ample evidence that Thole's a bad catcher even when he's not catching Dickey." Awesome - since that's what you're worried about, you don't need to come up with more excuses about why Dickey is the exceptional knuckleballer who's actually easy to catch.
You're him. You probably got kicked off the site for acting like this.
Page 4 of 4 pages
< 1 2 3 4You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.