Monday, May 13, 2013
Rosenthal: Anthony Rizzo Signing 7-Year, $41 Million Deal
(msn.foxsports.com)
“Peachy keen, jellybean.”
Read More...The Cubs, from the moment they acquired first baseman Anthony Rizzo 16 months ago, viewed him as a significant part of their future.
Now, they can guarantee it long-term.
The Cubs have reached agreement with Rizzo on a seven-year, $41 million contract through 2019, according to major-league sources. The deal also includes two $14.5 million club options, sources said.
Thus, the total value over nine years could be $68 million; Rizzo would not receive a $2 million ...
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Belfry Bob posted on November 13, 2012 at 02:54 PM # hit 0 | hit 0However, we were offended that the advertisement for the grand re-openning of "new urban hot spot gentlemens club" Lollypops, was not featured more prominantly.
Was so annoyed when they got knocked out.
Merson is a great player, he also won the tournament before the main event for $1.1 million.
A little surprised MLB wasn't all over this ... unless somebody actually did pay the licensing fee.
Do you think they'd be mad that he was wearing the jersey? or mad that he would be wearing it with the buttons/patches on it?
Has it really been reduced to a life-time ban? Will Rose become eligible upon his death?
Once you decide to sell officially branded apparel to the public, don't you waive that right (at least wrt the merchandise)? It's not like baseball jerseys come with an end user license agreement.
This although #9 is probably right. But I'm pretty sure I've seen plenty of corporate logos fuzzed out on new broadcasts and stuff. But, yes, I was thinking about how they don't let movies, games, etc. use real team names/logos unless they paid. But maybe they've eased up on that anyway (thinking back to Seinfeld, Mets, Yankees) which would be sensible.
is he saying this as some sort of viable excuse for rose? if so, that meme has to stop.
afaik, rose's ban is still 'permanent'. to me, that means forever, but i'm just a poster on a website.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.