Read More...In light of recent events involving All-American linebacker Manti Te’o, the Brooklyn Cyclones have announced that June 21st will be Fictitious Friday at MCU Park…
Anyone who purchases one ticket at regular price will be allowed to bring their make believe significant-other to the ballpark free of charge. Fans will also have the chance to draw a picture of their girlfriend, because obviously something came up and she couldn’t make it, so that their friends can finally see what she looks ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.2088 seconds, 160 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 40 of 68 pages
‹ First < 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 > Last ›Tuberville was also a really good recruiter. The last two years he got the (Rivals) 26th and 20th best classes as opposed to the classes in the 30s and 40s that Leach brought in. There is still some talent there but it's going to be hard to get someone who can both coach guys up and bring talent to Lubbock. I think it will be especially hard this late in the coaching search.
Edit: I guess if they get Kingsbury, that could keep the program moving forward. He seems to be a great coach.
I also don't understand why more FBS schools don't look at 1-AA coaches when filling roles. I'd much rather have my team get the best 1-AA coach on the market than a guy like Tommy Tuberville or Butch Jones.
Why? Mike London was a 1-AA HC and he hasn't exactly lit it up at UVA. I can't think of any other guys who made the jump. Chip Kelly was an OC at one. Brian Kelly was a D II coach. Tuberville and Jones are both good coaches who have proven that they know how to run a program and win a lot of football games at the FBS/BCS level.
Jim Harbaugh is a good example, Bobby Hauck is a bad example (who left a good Montana team to get destroyed at UNLV every year).
Tuberville must have hated Texas Tech for sure....
Jim Tressel made the jump. Tuberville I think basically just didn't interrupt the status quo as far as TT goes. Which I guess he gets credit for, but I don't find him to be an inspiring coach at all. Jones is ok, but I'm very weary of guys who haven't been at a program for more than a few years everywhere he's been. He's done well each place, so I understand him jumping up. But if I'm a higher level program, I'd like a guy who has shown they can build and maintain a great program. I also don't think there is much special about any of Butch Jones' teams - they had good records as much as a result of who they played rather than how good they were. A contrast to Chip Kelly, who actually had a couple of legitimately good teams with Cincy.
Paul Johnson.
If they beat Bama early I think you have to like their chances of at least making it to the SEC title game for a shot at the MNC game.
Thus, I'm pulling for North Dakota State!
I like them as dark horse candidates, but they are likely losing their bookend tackles, 3 of their top 5 WRs, their best pass rusher....
Mike MacIntyre (from San Jose State) to Colorado. Sure why not...
That's pretty much as far down the totem poll as you can go. I don't see what WKU has to gain here. They need someone to build on what Taggart left behind, not the horrible douche that Petrino is. He'll be gone the second he gets a better offer and he's never left a program in even decent shape after he leaves.
In the Cotton Bowl TAMU will be led by the offensive line coach.
Let's pretend they don't hire Kingsbury, who do they get? I support this type of hire.
Probably the best thing for Texas Tech. Kingsbury probably not going to leave TT unless its for a NFL job.
Supposedly the basketball schools want to kick out the football schools and keep the Big East moniker and associated rights. Apparently they are in a brief moment where the new members don't have votes yet and the leaving members don't have votes so the basketball schools have a clear majority of the votes.
I think they see that as a short-term trend, mostly diluted by the football-playing schools. It wouldn't surprise me if its also an attempt to get leverage over the incoming schools because of the existing brand (rather than forming a new conference). But the BE BB schools need Xavier, et. al., more than Xavier needs them.
Are you cracked? It's still a premier hoops conference. Who has heard of the A-10?
Bulter just joined, Dayton, St. Bonaventure, Temple, VCU and especially Xavier are known. Colleges that have left including Uconn, and Rugters have left because of football. Temple will leave the A-10 because of football (And even then they're going to find a new home.)
After all the departing members leaves, the Big East just going to be UConn, Cincy, South Florida, and the basketball only schools with DePaul, Georgetown, Marquette, Providence, st. John, Seaton Hall, and Villanova.
The days of the Big East being relevant in football and basketball are over. If I'm a A-10 team, why should I join a conference that with all the football members looking to bolt as fast as possible. Why am I'm leaving for a conference that TV deal is going to SUCK when they lose UConn and Cincy? I would rather stay in the A-10 and try to grow it internally, and more importantly know that basketball really does come first instead of playing second fiddle and hold to the whims of the football teams.
* It would be fascinating if the BE booted out UC to invite X, providing just one more reason for those two schools to hate each other.
Anyway, the Bug East's revenue is going to be better than the A-10. Basketball is generally less valuable but the BE has strong roots in much much bigger markets than the A-10 schools.
EDIT: oops, hasn't happened yet.
The bottom portion of the A-10 is pretty dreadful, in an RPI-impacting way (sadly, that's still relevant). Some of those teams (Fordham, I'm looking at you), need to be in the MEAC or even lower-profile conference.
My concern is that some of the...not-good...Big East programs who used to be kinda-sorta relevant still have an over-inflated sense of their importance.
I don't know if it's that much of a difference.
The Big East has St. John's and Seton Hall, the A-10 has Fordham. The Big East has UConn and Providence, the A-10 has UMass and URI. The Big East has Villanova, the A-10 has St. Joe's and La Salle. The Big East will soon cease to have Pitt, the A-10 has Duquesne. The Big East has Georgetown, the A-10 has George Washington. The Big East has Cincinnati, the A-10 has Xavier. The Big East has "strong roots" in Chicago and Milwaukee, the A-10 has Saint Louis and Indianapolis (those roots are not quite so strong). The big difference in terms of "markets" is whatever DePaul brings to the table, and the difference between St. John's and Fordham. Fordham sucks at basketball but it has a ton of alumni, and St. John's has not exactly been a powerhouse recently. (Steve Lavin changes everything?)
DePaul and Madison Square Garden.
I don't think Fordham is going to move to a conference of historically black schools whose northernmost member is in Baltimore. The football team already plays in the Patriot League. Or they could follow Hofstra to the CAA.
Supposedly the Jesus schools have the votes right now, for a very short period of time (until Temple is a full member), to possibly dissolve the league and retain their NCAA tournament credits. It appears likely they will do that, and probably invite some other schools aboard at that point. If they wait, they'll lose their window which will likely never return. They'll be saddled with SMU, Houston and the others forever.
While they may share the same geographic markets, in almost every case the Big East BB teams are considerably more successful. Georgetown is usually in the national rankings and plays its home games in the Verizon Center, a NBA arena. GW is rarely ranked and plays its home games in a nice 5,000 seat on-campus gym. Not all the differences are as stark, but the A-10 has a ways to go to match the Big East.
Yet, that's why conferences are adding football teams. Texas A&M became valuable to the SEC despite it being a very distant 2nd in terms of viewership and popularity in Texas to Texas. Just having a potential TV market is seemly more important than actually having a market.
I'm not sure A&M can be compared to George Washington and UMass. The former, despite being #2 in its state, is still perennially ranked and recognized as a more than respectable program throughout the nation. The latter would be like saying you got Miami, Toledo, and Kent St, so you've locked up the 12 million people in Ohio. They aren't just second fiddle, there's a huge chasm between them and #1.
Page 40 of 68 pages
‹ First < 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 > Last ›You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.