Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Getting more granular, here’s what the 2013 Cubs, position by position, would need to hit if they were to equal their ’67 counterparts, who rallied so heartily.
1B: Anthony Rizzo, BA: 276; HR: 23; RBI: 95 (Banks’s record)
2B: Darwin Barney, .280; 5; 40 (Beckert)
SS: Starlin Castro, .231; 0; 42 (Kessinger)
3B: Luis Valbuena, .300; 31; 98 (Santo)
RF: Nate Schierholtz, .218; 5; 33 (Ted Savage, part time, replacing Browne)
CF: David DeJesus, .268; 17; 70 (Phillips)
LF: Alfonso Soriano, .278; 28; 84 (Williams)
C: Welington Castillo, .267; 14; 60 (Hundley)
If you could make your pact with the devil, would you take those numbers right now? I would (a shame about the demise of Castro, but Javier Baez is on deck). Do you believe the 2013 team will come close those results? If so, I’d like to talk to you about a great deal on a slightly pre-driven relief pitcher named Carlos Marmol.
I sure don't understand the point of this article. I'm all for trips down memory lane, and hearing about seemingly random Cubs teams from yore. But what the hell does the '67 team have to do with 2013?
I don't get it. Aside from 3B, those lines are either spot on or would be a disappointment.
Agree. Nothing impressive about those numbers posted, ops+ does a better job, but still nothing out of line. But the 1967 Cubs had the best runs per game... They did do something right as a team.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
Login to Join (9 members)
Page rendered in 0.2362 seconds, 58 querie(s) executed