The Nationals traded right-handed reliever Henry Rodriguez to the Chicago Cubs in exchange for right-hander Ian Dickson. After three years of hoping Rodriguez would develop into a dominant and consistent power arm in their bullpen, the Nationals have finally and completely parted ways with him.
Login to Join (9 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 2.5223 seconds, 192 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 3 of 7 pages
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >Paniagua had previously tried to sign with Arizona and the Yanks, but both those contracts were voided by MLB for fraudulent paperwork. Paniagua's signing suspensions ended and he signed with the Cubs.
It looks like the RHP will count toward next year's international bonus pool, but the SS made it in before the deadline. Or I could be misreading.
Well, Hendry never got to be in rebuild mode. He inherited a team that was on the up and assembled his team. There was no way he would have ever been allowed to go into rebuild mode. For him to go into rebuild mode would mean his team had failed and if his team failed it would be unlikely that Hendry would be brought back to rebuild the team. So Hendry kept throwing pieces onto the team in the hopes that it would click and secure his tenure. Which means that he was never able to shop a "good" Zambrano or Marmol for prospects and such. He had to shop prospects for major leaguers.
but these guys seem such an upgrade from Hendry that it's as if they're playing different games.
Alas the same results, a losing record.
Saying "Alas the same results..." at this point is just absurd. This is still mostly Hendry's creation and is evidence of what Hendry would have accomplished without the massive financial advantage the Trib gave him.
Yep, in three years or so I might be able to say something different.
Farnsworth?
Sosa? They got Fontenot and Hairston for him which was a pretty good haul for a severely declining slugger.
Lilly was coming off an injury that cost him the end of 2009 and start of 2010. Greg Maddux was 40 years old. What do you think he could have gotten for him?
It'll give the Cubs three lefties in the pen, which is odd.
Aside from their minor leaguers, I think both Minor and Jurrjens are interesting players who might be undervalued and I wouldn't mind adding. The Braves probably aren't anywhere near giving up on Minor, though.
Somebody from MLB.com says the trade is done but is unsure if Delgado is in it.
Also, Cubs are sending cash.
He was DFA'd when Germano was added to the roster.
It may be a quiet deadline for the Cubs after all.
That's not all irrational. #### Dempster. Make him the lowest qualifying offer for compensation and tell him NOT to accept it or he'll be pitching mop-up. Take the comp pick and move on -- making sure to negotiate exemptions into the next 30something player you'll have for 5+ years.
Can such an exemption be made? It's in the CBA.
That said, the problem for the Cubs isn't the 5 and 10 rule, it's Hendry signing every free agent with a no-trade clause. Dempster has earned his right as far as I'm concerned.
I think so - 10/5 was in the last CBA, too - but the Astros' contract with Carlos Lee included an exemption that defined only a limited set of teams he could veto a trade after he made it to 10/5. I don't see why such a thing couldn't be negotiated again -- of course, it would be traded for something (more $$$, etc), so I'm being slightly tongue-in-cheek about demanding the clause...
Oh boy, time to see what kind of haul Maholm can fetch.
Garza actually doesn't concern me as much...
He's young enough that I wouldn't be averse to extending him - at a good price - he could well be the 'Dempster' of the next good Cubs team; the grizzled innings eater in the middle of the rotation. He can also be traded after the season without - to my mind - that much of a difference in his value.
Too bad LaHair has all but tanked - I doubt he fetches more than a bargain lottery ticket or spare parts.
I did see yesterday that at least one team has asked the Cubs for some specifics on the parameters of a Soriano trade.
Don't get your hopes up though.
If the Dodgers weren't willing to even go UP TO Allen Webster, who looks like a pretty run of the mill mid-rotation starter at best, then screw 'em. If I couldn't get Lee, then Webster would have had to headline a package.
I'll still be ticked at Dempster, but LA's system hasn't excited anyone in more than a generation. It's got a handful of your standard issue toolsy OFers that haven't really learned to play baseball, a few pitchers who might make serviceable relievers, and a couple of low ceiling bargain gems who probably will be solid contributors.
I'll just take my chances with a sandwich pick at this point...
There's no reason not to make a 'qualifying offer' -- the pick is 'free', meaning it doesn't have the potential to impact Dempster's chances on the market... Now... ~$12 million MIGHT be more than he get per annum on the market, but I have to think someone would offer him a 2-3 year deal. Plus, if he accepts - we get to do this all over again next July.... Whheeeeeeee!
Keep in mind that Dempster never actually rejected a trade to the Braves, the offer just expired with no approval from Ryan.
Both Scott Miller and Ken Rosenthal are reporting that Dempster/Dodgers trade discussions are back on.
There's also really weird talk that Soriano is being discussed as a possible bundle with Dempster.
Someone better make sure to hide the paper, the TV, the radio, and the internet from Ryan - all this talk of him being traded will give him another sad.
Eh, he just 22 and his K's are wwwaaaayyyy down compared his disastrous 2011 trial run. I think that in the long run, he's probably going to be more Mo Vaughn than say, Jim Thome (i.e, ~70 BBs/140 Ks vs. 120/160) - but you can build an offense around that.
Besides, I'm too busying worrying about Castro's season of regression to be concerned about Rizzo.
Not a Cubs' fan so I'm not worried but have seen Rizzo play several games and I wonder why any pitcher would throw him a strike. Of course lots of hitters will chase the breaking ball in the dirt; I used to watch the Cubs more regularly and S. Dunston never learned not to do this. In any case, if I were an opposing pitching coach, I would make sure that Rizzo saw off-speed pitches and little else. He definitely can punish a fast ball.
Carlos Zambrano has lost his spot in the Marlins' rotation... even with Sanchez dealt and Johnson still on the block. Z has been pretty awful since late May - the K/BB ratio is nearing 1:1 pretty quickly. Maybe Ozzie should take him out drinking.
********
Well, in his rookie age 23 season, Mo swung at 46% of pitches, which was also the MLB average rate. His career rate was 45 %, so it didn't change much over the years. He also swung at the first pitch 33% of the time over his career.
The notoriously undisciplined A Soriano has swung at 53% of pitches, and 31% of 1st pitches over his career.
This season, the 'revamped' Rizzo is swinging at 56% of the pitches he sees, and 45% on the first pitch. Supposedly, it doesn't take lots of PAs for these tendencies to 'stabilize'.
There aren't many batters who become true stars that swing as much as Rizzo is swinging. Vlad, Hamilton, and maybe a couple others. The league is certainly noticing his impatience, as he is seeing only 39% of the pitches in the zone.
To say that he will still likely become a disciplined hitter is a stretch. Sheffield is one that comes to mind that accomplished this. But it's very unusual.
As far as his K being "wwwaaayyy" down this year, yes, but how is he accomplishing this? By having a decent contact ability, but mainly by being so aggressive that the PA is over before he has 'time' to strike out. Not much of a feather in his cap, IMO.
I don't think it's hard to imagine him adjusting to a midpoint between these two approaches, but it will probably take a while for him to settle into that player.
I'm not sure I'd move Soto - he's having a dreadful year and his value is at its lowest. He's still got two arb years left and doesn't figure to get a raise on his 3 mil after this season - unless he rebounds the last two months, in which case he might fetch more in a trade.
On the other hand, he could be done... sometimes catchers crap out early.
Page 3 of 7 pages
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.