The Nationals traded right-handed reliever Henry Rodriguez to the Chicago Cubs in exchange for right-hander Ian Dickson. After three years of hoping Rodriguez would develop into a dominant and consistent power arm in their bullpen, the Nationals have finally and completely parted ways with him.
Login to Join (9 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.8473 seconds, 114 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Hello Rusty Kuntz, Goodbye Rusty Cars posted on November 16, 2012 at 02:12 PM # hit 0 | hit 0If this is the case, then what is the purpose of having Navarro around? Castillo bats righty and Clevenger lefty, so they'd already be potential platoon partners. It seems like both have been around long enough that if they aren't part of the plan in at least a backup capacity, they probably have no future. Navarro is a bit better than NRI roster filler, but like Dock said this seems like a bit of an overpay ... or at least odd that they felt the need to grab him off the market so early. I guess they want to make sure they have enough backup plans at catcher so they don't end up having to give Koyie Hill a call again this year.
The Cubs have a huge budget and there aren't going to be a a huge number of good places to spend all the money. It's probably worth a small overpay here just so Theo & Co. can get this taken care of early and so not have to think about the position again until the spring.
It's the market rate for 0.25 WAR given what teams will probably spend next year
Sure, he's averaging less than a quarter Win per season during his career, but now he's 28, in his prime. He's a good bet to break out and produce as much as 0.5 WAR!
In reality, if he gets lots of playing time he's probably good for half a win (or more if you think the organization is thin on Catchers, IDK), so he's an insurance type policy that comes with a small lottery ticket if he gets flipped for any type of prospect.
Navarro, meanwhile, has "better than Koyie Hill" going for him. That's about all, though.
But like #3 suggests, if you have two cheap, replacement level catchers already, why even burn $1.75 mill on Navarro?
Because Clevenger was not close to "replacement level" last season, and they don't have anyone on the farm who's any better. And because $1.75 million is essentially free in terms of baseball economics these days, especially for a team like the Cubs.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.