Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 2 of 2 pages
#85 As far back as the 1850s baseball has taken the point of view that there's no meaningful distinction between betting on a game that your team is involved in and game throwing.
But you cannot see a distinction between betting and throwing games enuf to warrant a different punishment?
Those laws should be reformed. What Rose did, though, is not one of them.
That's pretty much my position, with a very limited exception for "friendly wagers" of very small amounts. I wouldn't, for example, suggest that lifetime ban is appropriate if two opposing pitchers who happen to be friends make a deal that the loser buys the winner dinner after the game.
EDIT: But I would think it appropriate for MLB to react pretty harshly, with an official reprimand at the least, and possibly a fine or short suspension.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
Login to Join (1 members)
Page rendered in 0.4072 seconds, 57 querie(s) executed