BBTF.org/m/hof : Daily Herald: Our experts: Tough call on baseball’s Hall Of Fame

Friday, May 24, 2013

MLB: Don Sutton never shy about voicing his opinion

(mlb.mlb.com)

posted 1 day ago by Repoz to dodgers, hof | 18 comment(s)

Sutton: Because that’s where the defaced money is.

The outspoken Sutton—who came up with the Dodgers in 1966 and pitched with them for 16 of his 23 seasons—has his own opinion about everything.

He said in an interview last week that he hates pitch counts.

“I say it with a laugh in my voice when I broadcast: ‘That’s 100 pitches. On the next one, he’s going to turn into a troll.’ At 101, you just disappear. Poof, you’re gone,” Sutton said.

...MLB.com: Did you cheat?

Sutton: No, I never got ...

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

1. Jim (jimmuscomp) posted on January 01, 2013 at 05:37 PM # hit 0 | hit 0

Yeah, how DO you vote for Bonds and not Clemens? Is it a "he kinda admitted something" bump? Or just an oversight? It seems weird to penalize the guy who has denied everything from day 1 and was found not guilty in court. What kind of logic is that?!?

2. Gonfalon Bubble posted on January 01, 2013 at 05:47 PM # hit 0 | hit 0

Bagwell: 75%
Biggio: 75%
Morris: 75%
Piazza: 75%
Raines: 75%
Smith: 75%

Hooray, problem solved! With all those inductees, I just hope the platform is properly reinforced.

3. Jarrod HypnerotomachiaPoliphili(Teddy F. Ballgame) posted on January 01, 2013 at 06:10 PM # hit 0 | hit 0

The toughest decision came down to separating three great leadoff hitters — Craig Biggio, Kenny Lofton and Tim Raines. I went with Lofton because for a period of time I considered him one of the top five players in baseball.

A surprising choice by Imrem. Me, I'd have dropped Morris and Smith in favor of Biggio and Raines long before I worried about checking Lofton's name.

4. Mayor Blomberg posted on January 01, 2013 at 06:10 PM # hit 0 | hit 0

Schill got 100% of those ballots

5. Jolly Old St. Nick Done Jumped The Ship

posted on January 01, 2013 at 06:47 PM # hit 0 | hit 0

Yeah, how DO you vote for Bonds and not Clemens?

Yeah, especially after writing this:

Personally, the notion that steroids were great for the game seems so absurd it's laughable.

Following the guidelines of the vote, I've left off the steroids guys.

He then ignores what he just wrote and votes for Bonds anyway:

Forgive the obvious contradiction, but I've always said Bonds was a 400-400 guy before he got on the stuff, so he gets my vote. He was the best player in baseball, but everyone forgot him during the 1998 Home Run Derby.

It's too bad he felt like he had to join the steroid-freak parade.

His 1,455 runs scored his first 14 years would be good for 78th all time, his 445 home runs 37th, 460 stolen bases 49th and 1,299 RBI would be 110th.

He was MVP three times and won eight Gold Gloves the first 14 years of his career.

Though he apparently doesn't think that Clemens' 354 wins and 7 Cy Youngs are enough even to rate him an explanation for his rejection.

Of all the ballots I've seen posted yet, this one is absolutely the looniest.

6. zfan posted on January 01, 2013 at 10:06 PM # hit 0 | hit 0

Mike Imrem is an embarrassment, as usual. I'm referring to the McGwire and Sosa votes.

7. Bitter Mouse is a genre addict posted on January 02, 2013 at 09:15 AM # hit 0 | hit 0

Yeah, how DO you vote for Bonds and not Clemens?

Yes Bonds. No Clemens. Yes Morris and Schilling. Got me.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

/m/hof

Friday, May 24, 2013

MLB: Don Sutton never shy about voicing his opinion

Reader Comments and Retorts

Hof Think Factory