Sutton: Because that’s where the defaced money is.
Read More...The outspoken Sutton—who came up with the Dodgers in 1966 and pitched with them for 16 of his 23 seasons—has his own opinion about everything.
He said in an interview last week that he hates pitch counts.
“I say it with a laugh in my voice when I broadcast: ‘That’s 100 pitches. On the next one, he’s going to turn into a troll.’ At 101, you just disappear. Poof, you’re gone,” Sutton said.
...MLB.com: Did you cheat?
Sutton: No, I never got ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 0.7355 seconds, 139 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. JRVJ posted on December 22, 2012 at 11:36 AM # hit 0 | hit 0Are there really a lot of voters like this?
We're heading for the Ballot Cliff!
OK, well, even before I finished typing this stopped being funny. I do hope this year brings backlash against pinheads like this. He can't even manage to properly define his paranoid with hunt.
Probably not this extreme, but there don't have to be very many of them.
It only takes 150 voters (more or less) to keep someone out of the Hall of Fame - and there will probably be at least that many who apply some form of PED penalty.
-- MWE
What do you have against symmetry?
Ah yes, the 'suspicion category.' It all makes sense now.
You sit next to Larry Bowa long enough...soon your own pants start to stink.
PED bad
after all he DID manage to pitch well into his late 30s long after most power rightys are cooked and the only way he coulda lasted an entire 10 innings was with something to enhance that performance, right?
i mean, honestly. you talk about The Obvious
Somebody must have posted that one before :(
And backne. Don't forget about that.
That made me LOL. Even if somebody had posted it before, it's still well done. XD
Ah yes, the 'suspicion category.' It all makes sense now.
Piazza and Bagwell are in the suspicion category, and Bobby Van and Elaine Joyce are with us in the Banana Section.
who was using? who is the suspiscious trainer/entourage person/people? i mean, caminiti was gone BEFORE he started shooting up. (unless people are saying he brought them back in 99/2000 AFTER he stopped using)
what known/convicted roid user besides miguel tejada was in/around the clubhouse?
Do you actually expect an employee of MLB Network to pick anyone remotely controversial on the air or otherwise? He also stayed away from Bonds and Clemens and picked Dale Murphy since his good character put him over the top.
Not only do you get a Primey for that, Bob, but I just updated your wikipedia page with "Bob is a regular contributor to the Baseball Think Factory website" -- referencing this very thread.
I know. I'm scared, too.
Yeah... I can't think of a single credible accusation (Mitchell Report, admissions, "leaked" positives, or even Canseco-type stuff) that links steroids to Astros while they were on the team. Caminiti gave a specific timeline for when he used, and it was after he left the Astros. McNamee's accusations against Pettitte and Clemens were before the Astros.
In fact, the Astros were one of the last organizations to have anyone dinged under the current testing/penalties.
If anything, the Caminiti narrative is evidence that Bagwell did NOT use, since Bagwell and Caminiti were friends for most of their time as teammates. If he was going to start using like his buddy, he probably would have started while they were teammates, wouldn't you think?
In fact, there are lots of guys who had late-career power jumps (the type usually associated with steroids under the current paradigm of suspicion) after LEAVING the Astros: Caminiti, Finley, Luis Gonzalez, for example. The Astrodome obviously had a lot to do with that, but park factors don't explain the jumps these guys had. Again, if these guys were taking steroids, it seems like they started (to feel the effects, at least) after leaving Houston.
I'm not being a fanboy (I know that it's likely that the Astros had some users, maybe Bagwell and Biggio, even). But it's really dumb that people think of them as some sort of "hub" like the late-'80s A's or early-90s Rangers (Canseco teams, basically) have the reputation of being.
they were buddies the first time cammy was in the astros but he left in 04 to go to the padres, where he started using. he did NOT use while he was with the astros. he himself SEZ that he and bagwell/biggio were no longer friendly because of his alcoholism problem. he came back in 99, but cammy SEZ he had stopped the roids and The Media thinks that baggy began using BEFORE 99 - like, 92. or whatever their story is THIS time.
i'm not believing that didn't none of the astros goody 2 shoes guys ever use - i think of the 2 guys i really suspect like richard hidalgo and mitch melusky and i've always had strong suspiscions about mo alou - who was, by the way, for a LONG time, bagwell's best friend.
but youneverknow and for all we know, adam everett was shooting roids.
i know there was some guy at some houston area gym who knew this guy who knew a guy who knew bagwell's trainer. who is mary lou retton or her cousin or something. but except for jeff pearlman's Secret Source who has not given any real proof of anything, i don't know of ANYONE who gave/sold drugs to jeff bagwell.
trouble is that the guy decided to lift weights. and Real Ballplayers like junior griffey didn't work out
Clearly, this taints the entire Astros organization for all time. Never mind that a United States magistrate subsequently stated that Grimsley had never mentioned Clemens and Pettitte in any context whatsoever, and criticized the Times for "irresponsible reporting" and "manufacturing of facts."
30 seconds or so of wikipedia can do a lot to clear up the suspicion category.
IIRC the person making the accusation backed down about five seconds after he was confronted and asked to elaborate.
------------------------------------------------
The only difference between this moron and some of his opponents is that while they're all fine with lumping known juicers with suspected juicers, this moron wants to use that assumption to keep the suspected ones out of the HoF, while his opponents want to use that same assumption to justify letting the known ones in. AFAIC they deserve each other, even though at this point it's morons like this who are likely to cause the most damage.
Bagwell.
I would really like to be able to see who these guys have voted for in the past. OK, Biggio doesn't make his cut. Did he ever vote for say Steve Garvey or Tommy John, or Keith Hernandez?
Capozzi, one year ago: "When the time comes, I might end up casting votes for Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens because I think they both put up Hall-worthy numbers before PED suspicions surfaced."
What a catch 22 - if you're good enough to make the Hall you must've used steroids so you don't get my vote. If you didn't use steroids you weren't dominant and don't get my vote.
We should tie a stone around their necks, and toss 'em into the lake.
If they reach the surface, they are PED users and ineligible for HOF.
If not, they are inducted immediately - albeit posthumously..
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.