Per Sandberg: Self-Appointed Chairman of the Committee on HOF Justice. #norynonoryno
Read More...MLB.com: During your Hall of Fame acceptance speech in 2005, you spoke a lot about playing the game the right way. What was your take on the most recent voting?
Sandberg: Well, first of all, the voting is in the hands of the sportswriters who follow the game, and I think that the writers once again sent a strong message to baseball that illegal drugs and all that is not and should not be a part of baseball. I ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.0926 seconds, 117 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 4 of 4 pages
< 1 2 3 4You're wrong, again. You not only consider NPB play, you consider the quality of NBP play, and whether the player had the option of complete movement, the same way your consider Negro Leaguers.
I used to think your obtuse reasoning in the political threads was simply in order to avoid admitting you were wrong, or to be a nuisance.
After this thread it's clear to me you simply do not know how to reason. Taking a silly argument and using it to justify your silly conclusion is... silly. Even in order to prove a point, which you have not done.
Please consult some elementary logic texts before posting again.
There's also a 5-year waiting period, but the HOF can suspend that rule whenever it wants, as well (Clemente, Lou Gehrig). The HOF can elect people as pioneers, even with otherwise undistinguished careers -- Candy Cummings, Tommy McCarthy. What are the criteria to making it as a pioneer, exactly? No one knows, because the HOF can basically make up any criteria it wants.
"MLEs" for Matsui and Ichiro in Japan (I say "MLE" because I don't have park factors)
Ichiro
1994 162
1995 177
1996 155
1997 151
1998 148
1999 165
2000 169
Having trouble finding the stats for Troy Neel in Japan. Doug Jennings was a teammate for two years and put up "OPS" of 144 and 129. Neel was quite a bit more successful than Jennings.
All that to say that while in Japan, Suzuki probably wasn't as good a hitter as Troy Neel (at least not in Neel's best seasons. Suzuki has him in volume and consistency). This is of course not an insult. Neel could hit and Suzuki brought plenty more to the table than Neel.
Matsui
1993 109
1994 134
1995 131
1996 174
1997 169
1998 175
1999 178
2000 197
2001 195
2002 224
Took Matsui a while to find his stride (but he was all of 22 in 1996).
No really good comps for Matsui after he took that step forward. Jeff Manto spent part of a year there (and seems to have been pretty bad). Shane Mack was a teammate for years. Can't get his stats for some reason either.
Quoting some interesting snippets from a February 2002 article Clay wrote for BP. I imagine our idea of how the two leagues relate was much more primitive 10 years ago when he wrote this.
FWIW, Clay has Hideki Matsui as being a CF in Japan.
---------
In 2002, Matsui hit 463/692 in Japan. Two years earlier, Jason Giambi hit 477/660 over here, and his OPS+ was "only" 199. Mark McGwire's big year (470/752) only earned him a 216 OPS+.
The MLE for Matsui's 2002 season should be a lot lower than 224.
Petagine: .317/.446/.633 career Japan
Tuffy: .289/.384/.535 career Japan
Petagine also OPS'd Tuffy in AAA by over 150 points
Petagine was a much better hitter than Tuffy- comparable to Hidecki Matsui- Rhodes was not
Quoting:
Not sure whether that accounts for the specific fact that the cheap home run is easier to come by in Japan than at least MLB.
That's correct for the time. Matsui's primary position with Yomiuri was right field in 1993-1996, and center field in 1997-2002.
Their batting styles weren't terribly far apart, as each hitter looked like he was slapping at the ball. At the end of the day, they end up as broadly comparable hitters by OPS+ -- though Ichiro has the clear edge there -- but Ichiro has the defense/arm/baserunning edges.
Quoting from BP 2001:
It was a fair comment by BP. I don't think anyone predicted - did they? - the value that would subsequently show up in Ichiro's defense/running stats. Nor frankly the sheer number of infield hits, gotten by an at-times singularly focused approach to try for infield singles.
And #158 Ichiro was better than Tuffy Rhodes while the two were in Japan but it's not like he buried Rhodes. They can be sensibly compared
As I've said many times before, Ichiro's value in context doesn't blow me away, but at the same time there was good reason to expect him to be more successful than Matsui in America.
Also to #161, worth noting that WAR treats infield singles separately -- they're somewhat less valuable than a regular single. IOW WAR accounts for his unusual distribution of hits. (Sean roolz)
Yankees Runs/Plate Appearances from July 23, 2012, onward:
16.1% A-Rod
14.7% Jeter
14.6% Ibanez
14.5% Cano
13.3% Granderson
12.7% Swisher
12.5% Chavez
12.3% Martin
11.7% Ichiro
I'm glad someone posted this. Small sample size, I know, but it confirms the thought I've always had about Ichiro - despite being a superficially good looking baserunner, the man has trouble scoring runs.
A-Rod .358
Jeter .372
Ibanez .325
Cano .383
Granderson .270
Swisher .393
Chavez .368
Martin .327
Ichiro .340
Granderson and Ibanez, and Swisher and Cano look like the surprising ones in terms of the relationship between OBP and Runs per PA. I'd guess where you bat in the order influences things as well.
Page 4 of 4 pages
< 1 2 3 4You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.