Per Sandberg: Self-Appointed Chairman of the Committee on HOF Justice. #norynonoryno
Read More...MLB.com: During your Hall of Fame acceptance speech in 2005, you spoke a lot about playing the game the right way. What was your take on the most recent voting?
Sandberg: Well, first of all, the voting is in the hands of the sportswriters who follow the game, and I think that the writers once again sent a strong message to baseball that illegal drugs and all that is not and should not be a part of baseball. I ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 0.5875 seconds, 89 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 2 of 2 pages
< 1 2I certainly don't think there is any reasonable objection to putting Greg Maddux in the Hall of Fame, but that's not my point. Imagine if you asked 500 people to vote for the seven greatest humans in world history¹. It seems likely to me that no one would get 75% in that vote, not because there is much of a cogent argument to be made against Jesus/Muhammed/whoever, but just because there are so many options, and so many voters who each have their own idiosyncratic approaches, that the whole thing is a mishigoss.
Now of course, the 2014 BBHOF ballot isn't as open-ended as that hypothetical ballot would be. And don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Maddux is unlikely to be elected. But I don't think it's anything like a 100% chance of election either. And if he does get elected, I don't think it'll be with an unusually high percentage. (If Biggio does get in, that of course does help Maddux out.)
I should also note that although I think it's going to exacerbate the "HOF crisis" if no one at all gets elected, I certainly agree with #12 that electing a couple of people is not going to make everything business as usual again.
¹ I say seven rather than 10 because that's what I imagine the average names per ballot this year will be.
I do, as I said in that previous thread. He's a 100 percent lock. Biggio and Maddux are not terribly comparable Hall of Fame candidates. Biggio's possible failure to reach 75 percent is not surprising to me. I said last year that it was possible he'd make it through on the first ballot, but also possible he'd get squeezed and it would take 2-3 elections for him to make it. This year's early results confirm just what I and some others believed.
Maddux won't have the same issues as Biggio. He will sail into the Hall, with better than 90 percent of the votes.
And to stand by my conviction, I'll repeat the offer I made there: I'll offer a BBRef bet that someone will be elected to the Hall by the BBWAA in each of the next five years (starting in 2014).
Glory Howheblewya!
Watched Clubhouse Confidential yesterday, the one with Bill James as guest. On the show, James mentioned something about folks thinking Maddux was scuffing the ball. I hadn't heard that one before -- is James blowing smoke or is there any legit thinking on the issue?
And yeah, that's the worst HoF ballot I've seen yet. Saying a lot, too.
no. i know i posted my thoughts on who was scuffing a long time ago on this site.
it was common chatter that in the last 5-6 years maddux was resorting to 'tinkering'
James has hinted at this before.
I don't know the origins of the quote but somebody on this site once told me that Maddux said he disn't scuff balls but he knew what to do with them when he got one that was scuffed by being put in play.
Page 2 of 2 pages
< 1 2You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.