BBTF.org

- /micros

Login to Join (3 members)

Countdown of the best 25 GMs - #23

(13 -*4:22pm, Jan 15)*

Last: Mark Armour

Bastian: Mind Over Matter: Bauer Goes High Tech in Offseason Regimen

(3 -*2:00pm, Dec 29)*

Last: ReggieThomasLives

Santa Claus remembers Cleveland Indians whether they've been naughty or nice | cleveland.com

(2 -*10:20am, Dec 25)*

Last: Coot Veal and Cot Deal taste like Old Bay

Indians sign Gavin Floyd to deal

(9 -*8:37pm, Dec 17)*

Last: Dock Ellis on Acid

Terry's Talkin' about the Cleveland Indians, Carlos Santana and the search for power -- Terry Pluto | cleveland.com

(2 -*1:14pm, Nov 04)*

Last: tolbuck

Corey Kluber strikes out 14 in second straight start

(13 -*6:30pm, Sep 22)*

Last: toratoratora

The New York Daily News will no longer print images of Chief Wahoo

(27 -*2:06am, Sep 08)*

Last: if nature called, ladodger34 would listen

Gammons: Looking ahead at the Indians’ Big Four power arms

(2 -*3:45am, Sep 07)*

Last: bobm

Indians Sign Russell Branyan

(16 -*4:53pm, Aug 30)*

Last: Misirlou was a Buddhist prodigy

Nick Swisher undergoes surgery, is out for the year

(6 -*4:23pm, Aug 21)*

Last: madvillain

Corey Kluber has rain to thank for rise to game's elite

(10 -*11:49am, Aug 16)*

Last: Norcan

Ohio state senator urges Cleveland Indians to change team name, mascot

(37 -*4:33pm, Aug 09)*

Last: tfbg9

Indians announce major changes for Progressive Field in 2015

(20 -*9:52am, Aug 08)*

Last: Nasty Nate

Must C: Ball gets loose on field

(14 -*8:08pm, Aug 06)*

Last: Zach

Livingston: Jim Thome is Cleveland Indians' HR leader, but statue should have been Omar Vizquel

(44 -*2:34pm, Aug 04)*

Last: Ron J2

(13 -

Last: Mark Armour

Bastian: Mind Over Matter: Bauer Goes High Tech in Offseason Regimen

(3 -

Last: ReggieThomasLives

Santa Claus remembers Cleveland Indians whether they've been naughty or nice | cleveland.com

(2 -

Last: Coot Veal and Cot Deal taste like Old Bay

Indians sign Gavin Floyd to deal

(9 -

Last: Dock Ellis on Acid

Terry's Talkin' about the Cleveland Indians, Carlos Santana and the search for power -- Terry Pluto | cleveland.com

(2 -

Last: tolbuck

Corey Kluber strikes out 14 in second straight start

(13 -

Last: toratoratora

The New York Daily News will no longer print images of Chief Wahoo

(27 -

Last: if nature called, ladodger34 would listen

Gammons: Looking ahead at the Indians’ Big Four power arms

(2 -

Last: bobm

Indians Sign Russell Branyan

(16 -

Last: Misirlou was a Buddhist prodigy

Nick Swisher undergoes surgery, is out for the year

(6 -

Last: madvillain

Corey Kluber has rain to thank for rise to game's elite

(10 -

Last: Norcan

Ohio state senator urges Cleveland Indians to change team name, mascot

(37 -

Last: tfbg9

Indians announce major changes for Progressive Field in 2015

(20 -

Last: Nasty Nate

Must C: Ball gets loose on field

(14 -

Last: Zach

Livingston: Jim Thome is Cleveland Indians' HR leader, but statue should have been Omar Vizquel

(44 -

Last: Ron J2

Pitchfork: Jack White Gets His Own Baseball Card

(126 -*10:25pm, Jan 26)*

Last: frannyzoo

An Audience With the ‘Sports Pope’ at FrancesaCon

(9 -*10:25pm, Jan 26)*

Last: Win Big Stein's Money

Beyond the Box Score's rankings of the best players for 2015: 45-11 - Beyond the Box Score

(9 -*10:23pm, Jan 26)*

Last: Walt Davis

OT: Monthly NBA Thread - January 2015

(1479 -*10:10pm, Jan 26)*

Last: Into the Void

Yanks to contest 'milestone HR'

(40 -*10:04pm, Jan 26)*

Last: 6 - 4 - 3

OT: Wrestling Thread November 2014

(418 -*9:58pm, Jan 26)*

Last: Chokeland Bill

IN PURSUIT OF PENNANTS #15 — Walt Jocketty

(12 -*9:45pm, Jan 26)*

Last: Ziggy

OT: NFL/NHL thread

(11638 -*9:43pm, Jan 26)*

Last: Nasty Nate

Mariners notebook: Zduriencik says `no favorite right now’ in spring shortstop battle between Miller and Taylor | Mariners Insider - The News Tribune

(4 -*9:40pm, Jan 26)*

Last: bookbook

OT - Politics January 2015 - Mario Cuomo, New York Governor and Minor League Ballplayer, Dies at 82

(3692 -*9:18pm, Jan 26)*

Last: Mefisto

Bring Back Selig - New Commissioner Manfred is a Moron - Halos Heaven

(274 -*8:51pm, Jan 26)*

Last: Monty

Blue Jays end negotiations for Orioles' Duquette - Sportsnet.ca

(23 -*8:05pm, Jan 26)*

Last: Boileryard

New MLB commissioner Rob Manfred's top five priorities - ESPN

(29 -*7:48pm, Jan 26)*

Last: Bourbon Samurai

OT: The NHL is finally back thread, part 2

(1007 -*7:18pm, Jan 26)*

Last: Win Big Stein's Money

THT: Baseball’s craziest game?

(42 -*6:50pm, Jan 26)*

Last: Morty Causa

(126 -

Last: frannyzoo

An Audience With the ‘Sports Pope’ at FrancesaCon

(9 -

Last: Win Big Stein's Money

Beyond the Box Score's rankings of the best players for 2015: 45-11 - Beyond the Box Score

(9 -

Last: Walt Davis

OT: Monthly NBA Thread - January 2015

(1479 -

Last: Into the Void

Yanks to contest 'milestone HR'

(40 -

Last: 6 - 4 - 3

OT: Wrestling Thread November 2014

(418 -

Last: Chokeland Bill

IN PURSUIT OF PENNANTS #15 — Walt Jocketty

(12 -

Last: Ziggy

OT: NFL/NHL thread

(11638 -

Last: Nasty Nate

Mariners notebook: Zduriencik says `no favorite right now’ in spring shortstop battle between Miller and Taylor | Mariners Insider - The News Tribune

(4 -

Last: bookbook

OT - Politics January 2015 - Mario Cuomo, New York Governor and Minor League Ballplayer, Dies at 82

(3692 -

Last: Mefisto

Bring Back Selig - New Commissioner Manfred is a Moron - Halos Heaven

(274 -

Last: Monty

Blue Jays end negotiations for Orioles' Duquette - Sportsnet.ca

(23 -

Last: Boileryard

New MLB commissioner Rob Manfred's top five priorities - ESPN

(29 -

Last: Bourbon Samurai

OT: The NHL is finally back thread, part 2

(1007 -

Last: Win Big Stein's Money

THT: Baseball’s craziest game?

(42 -

Last: Morty Causa

Page rendered in 0.4217 seconds, 57 querie(s) executed

## Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

1. McCoy posted on August 10, 2012 at 02:01 PM #Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.edit: So I went back and looked and MLB played 22 less games than scheduled so that drops it down to 48,578 streaks and a slightly higher .14%.

And so the binomial distribution tells us that this means that the average team has a true talent of .449, or about 73-89.

EDIT: Or that MLB as a whole has a true talent of .449, or whatever. I'm being flip.

We've done this before, with batting streaks. The problem is that you really don't have 152 chances to have an 11 game losing streak. In actuality it's much less. If you have a 7 game losing streak and then win one, you've eaten up 8 of your mythical 152 chances in one go.

Maybe he just did the National League.

If you have a 7 game losing streak and then win one, you've eaten up 8 of your mythical 152 chances in one go.How does that make 152 chances mythical?

You lose game one of the season, so you've started a streak. The you lose game 2. That's a continuation of your first streak, not a new one. Then you lose games 3-9, and then win game 10. So your first attempt ended in "failure". But at that point, you don't have 151 more chances.

Hell, even if you lose game 1 and win game 2, thus failing in your first attempt. Starting in game 3 you have only 150 more chances, not 151.

edit: so to answer directly, it's mythical because the only way to have 152 chances is if you win your first 151 games of the season.

From 2002 to 2011 there have been 67 11 game losing streaks. In a 162 games schedule there are 152 sets of 11 games. Assuming all teams played 162 games gives us 4,860 11 game streaks per year. So .14% of all 11 game streaks resulted in a 11 game losing streak.Does this count a 12-game losing streak (assuming there have been any) as two 11-game losing streaks? Because obviously those two chances are not independent of each other. Which I think gets at what #7 is talking about [EDIT: although now I am not sure after reading #10].

Also, for those who can figure this out, how many 11 game winning streaks have there been?

EDIT #2: removed a sentence because of bad statistics.

Yeah, there's that too.

Hell, even if you lose game 1 and win game 2, thus failing in your first attempt. Starting in game 3 you have only 150 more chances, not 151.Winning in game 2 doesn't just make you fail your first chance but it also makes you fail in your second chance. You've played two games and have a win in your second game. You now have 150 chances to lose 11 games in a row. I'm still not seeing how 152 chances is mythical.

If 152 chances is mythical what are the true amount of chances per season for a team?

thatin your odds and smoke 'em...But does that count the 12 game streaks as 2 11's? And the 13's as 3 11's. And so forth. If not, then the percentages will be much much higher.

That'swhy the 152 chances are mythical.But does that count the 12 game streaks as 2 11's? And the 13's as 3 11's. And so forth. If not, then the percentages will be much much higher. That's why the 152 chances are mythical.Why? I'm not looking at the odds that a team will lose exactly 11 games. I'm looking at the odds that a team will lose 11 in a row at some point. And again if 152 chances is mythical what is the right amount of chances?

Have there been 63 streaks of 11-or-more losses? Or have there been 63 sequences of LLLLLLLLLLL? You don't want to count a 12-game losing streak twice, but you do want to count it at least once.

There are 152 chances, you just can't treat them as independent.

Yeah, I guess that's what I was getting at. Without saying, or even realizing it, my point was there aren't 152

independentchances. a 12 game losing streak is a 12 game losing streak, not 2 11's. For a team, the chances of losing 11 in a row, and then losing the next game to make two 11 game streaks, are not remotely the same. For a true talent .500 team, the odds for the former is (using the odds from the excerpt), are .049%. For the latter it's 50%.As for this, it depends. It's not a question that can be answered

a priori. It depends on the distribution of wins and losses, with a lower bound I suppose of 14 (a team which loses 10 and then wins 1, loses 10, wins one... for the entire season), and an upper bound of 152 (the afore mentioned 151-0 team).Perhaps, but you're treating them as independent in #2.

An equal mix of 61-win teams and 101-win teams have about 8 times more 11-loss streaks than a group of 81-win teams.

EDIT: My point is that approximating the win probability with 50% is going to be wrong by orders of magnitude (one here, if you got the Astros in the league, more).

1899 Spiders lost 24 in a row.

/I was there in '88, so we were wondering if we might just get that record.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.