Read More...NBC said Sunday it is aware of sportscaster Al Michaels’ arrest for allegedly driving under the influence in Santa Monica but declined to say whether it would affect his work with the network.
Greg Hughes, a spokesman for NBC Sports, told Associated Press that the network had been “in contact with Michaels.” Hughes declined to elaborate.
A longtime announcer on NBC’s “Sunday Night Football,” Michaels was arrested at about 10 p.m. Friday, booked into jail and released on his own recognizance ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.0006 seconds, 166 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 1 of 8 pages
1 2 3 4 5 6 > Last ›Could the Red Sox pry a decent package out of the Dodgers by just threatening to let the claims stand on both players? Beckett is owed $34 million after this season, and the Red Sox could well just want to be rid of that. Gonzalez had more perceived value, but also a much larger (and longer) contract.
Anyway, when was the last multi-player blockbuster trade during the waiver period?
Only if the amount of salary picked up is worth as much to the Dodgers as what they'd give up. By making the claim, the Dodgers have shown that Gonzalez is worth his salary to them.
Crazy trade or craziest trade?
@jonmorosi Source: If #Dodgers - #RedSox blockbuster occurs -- and it is "close" -- Boston would send some cash to LA.
Now THAT would be something. The Sox would trade those players and get back the reset button from an LA computer.
(Someone must be messing with Edes.)
Getting rid of Beckett is nice, but I really don't think it is worth selling low on Gonzalez. This contract looked like a steal before the season, at least compared to the other mega deals out there, a bad three months isn't enough to give up on him.
IOW, good work new Red Sox administration! If this happens (and I am sure it won't because it would just be too awesome), I look forward to only being worried about Tampa, Baltimore and Toronto over the next few years.
But throw in Crawford's contract, too, and it gets interesting from the Red Sox, POV. That's a lot of dead weight off the payroll.
That's true, but Crawford could conceivably be good again in the future once he is healthy. And the Sox are kicking in cash. Dumping a franchise first baseman to unload salary seems like a waste. And dumping a guy like A-Gon at the absolute nadir of his value just seems like a mistake.
For a team that is supposed to compete annually, this is a bizarre move and they aren't going to be able to just reload at first.
Is there another Anderson who plays first base?
Anderson is gone - not that he'd be a real solution anyway. They could probably sign the corpses of Berkman or Reynolds or something although I guess that's pretty much the equivalent of punting.
Forgot about that. Adam LaRoche has some kind of option after the season, so he might be available.
I wouldn't do it. I'd let Beckett go and trade Punto for anything and keep the other two.
I'm only reconciled to this if they trade Henry and Lucchino as well as the players.
Does anyone think Beckett would be crazy enough to block the claim to LA? Why would he do that?
A-Gon's poster is being taken down at Fenway.
Can you imagine someone claiming him?
Wouldn't a planned deal without Beckett make sense here?
I think the Sox are more likely to go after trades than signings -- Hamilton won't make sense, doubt Jackson, probably not Greinke.
So, that means, who: J-Up, Choo...who else might be available?
What a scoop! What I love about twitter is that you can be an hour late to news and you can look like an idiot.
Page 1 of 8 pages
1 2 3 4 5 6 > Last ›You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.