Our very own Dag Nabbit (of BTF/THT fame) was in New York to film a segment evaluating managers for a MLB Network show. They ran the segment on Clubhouse Confidential today.
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 0.9956 seconds, 163 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 1 of 2 pages
1 2 >And the absence of Larry Bowa jokes next season will be appreciated.
I think the idea, and it's a logical one, is that catcher is the position that most effectively bridges the two key elements of the game. The catcher is a hitter, but he's also intimately involved with a team's pitching staff. No other position requires that kind of involvement with the two critical team components.
That's probably a part of it. I also think that you will usually have to have above-average intelligence to be a catcher in MLB, because there's so much to think about and to remember. Catchers are the only players who are expected to be offensive contributors but also have to know everything about pitching, so they'll know both sides of the game better than other players. Catching takes odd skills and hard work, so I'd guess that there are more players who make it to MLB on brains and effort at catcher than at any other position. All these things probably have some part in it.
Unless he has bad breath, in which case he needs in-game Tic Tacs. Fresh mint is good for that.
No need to stock clothes either.
But this one took the marlins job.
The best poker playing ball players I have met are pitchers, believe it or not. Sample size caveats, obviously.
Or just the latest MLB fad.
Is this the most useless statistic in baseball?
I thought it went back quite a way. Isn't the catcher usually considered the on-field manager/captain? As far as I can remember, catchers were seen as more cerebral. In any player poll of who would make a good future manager, catchers dominate the list.
I agree, and would add that the catcher is also intimately involved with the manager and pitching coach as far as planning and executing the strategy for the pitcher. Even though that's only one part of what goes into "managing," it's a big part, and in gives a catcher the experience to assist on a strategy level. Someone like Adrian Beltre is not involved in this kind of aspect.
Slightly OT but re Giambi and him being floated as a candidate for the Rockies' job, I was sifting through my copy of Baseball Prospectus, the 2000 annual, and Giambi's player comment mentioned that Billy Beane went out of his way to ask for Giambi's comments on roster decisions. I found this comment interesting in light of Giambi's recent connection with the vacant Colorado job, as it seems like Giambi was interested in managing even as a younger player. I would love to see him become a player-manager in 2013, basically as a PH and backup 1B.
(Though I haven't checked b-r to see whether he still has some offensive skills, e.g., the ability to mash RHP; I know he can still take a walk, which may be enough: a PH really only needs to be a better hitter than the pitchers he's batting for. Maybe it's not the ideal use of a roster spot, but neither is the 18th reliever on the staff.)
That's how it starts. Then there aren't any players older than you and there are managers younger than you, your favorite childhood players start dying of old age...
You thought what went back quite a way -- former catchers as managers or catchers having a rep as the most cerebral of positions? I was only commenting on the former.
Using games managed among fairly recent managers:
non-Cs: LaRussa, Cox, Anderson, Mauch, Weaver, Durocher, Alston, Piniella, LaSorda, Baker, Williams, Tanner, Kelly, Hargrove, Valentine, Johnson, Martin, Howe, Robinson, Fregosi, Showalter, Alou, Garner, Schoendienst, Francona, Gardenhire, Zimmer, Tracy, Gaston, Manuel
Cs: Torre, Leyland, Houk, Bochy, Scioscia
We're down to 1700 games managed, you can keep going if you want. Catchers might be over-represented but it's hardly lopsided. The only position that seems seriously under-represented is pitcher (La Sorda's the only long-serving one of recent vintage, yes?).
Note, whether we should count folks like Leyland (or LaRussa or LaSorda) who never really played in the majors and worked their way up through the coaching system is unclear to me -- i.e. the position they played likely had no impact on their hiring as ML managers since they had proven they knew what they were doing as they worked their way up. It may have had something to do with them getting coaching opportunities to start with but that's a different pile to dig into. Of those who went from long ML career to managing (in generally quick fashion), you've got:
Piniella, Baker, Hargrove, Valentine, Johnson, Martin, Howe, Robinson, Fregosi, Alou, Garner, Schoendienst, Francona, Gaston, Robinson (and maybe Gardenhire and Zimmer?) vs. Torre, Bochy and Scioscia.
Anyway, if managers are predominantly Cs, it's a new trend. If it's still just something like 1 out of every 6-7 managers is a former C, that's in line with history. Of relatively new managers (I'll let you guys look up the minor-leaguers)
non-C: Ventura, Sveum, Mattingly, Gibson, and maybe Giambi
C: Metheny and Redmond and maybe Alomar (interim manager last I heard)
I'm not sure that constitutes a trend. Or did I forget somebody.
No one said it was.
For the 2012 season, 9 of 30 managers had been catchers, which is a pretty healthy clip.
Actual headline from USA Today's website: Marlins replace Ozzie with batting-cage nudist.
Bench coach in Cleveland though he still might get the Toronto job.
Does Eric Wedge still have a job?
Tom Kelly and Mike Hargrove were both first basemen. As was Joe Torre at the end of his career.
Is this the most useless statistic in baseball?
It's in a close race with range factor for a first baseman.
then one day you look up and you're older than the freakin president of the united states ...
That can't be right. Ozzie Guillen, A.J. Hinch, Robin Ventura, and Mike Matheny, to name a few off the top of my head, are all very recent players.
Wpa for the win.
I'd say it starts when you're older than at least one major league player (for me, Bryce Harper was the first to meet this criterion). But yes, I'm sure I'll look up one day a couple decades from now and realize that I'm older than everyone on the field.
I'm probably one of the youngest semi-regular commenters on this board (20 years old), and I didn't start following baseball with any seriousness until 2007.
Jake Taylor?
From that article comes the more interesting tidbit: "Redmond will be the fifth Marlins manager since 2010." OUCH! Welcome to the Jeff Loria meat grinder.
WHICH WOULD MAKE IT A RECENT TREND OUT OF STEP WITH THE HISTORICAL MIX as my rather long list of long-serving managers dating back about nearly 50 years demonstrated I thought.
Which could mean it is just the latest MLB fad -- ooh, look, that manager-former catcher was successful, we should hire a former catcher as manager.
Jim Fregosi started the 1978 season as a player with the Pirates and finished it as a manager with the Angels.
- torii hunter taking batting practice nude?
here and i swore that wouldn't nothing get me back to minute maid park. i didn't know that nothin included nothin on
First, providing a list of long-serving managers doesn't refute the question asked by Swedish Chef or the comment AG1F made. Chef asked if catchers have a leg-up on getting hired, not whether they become greater at a far higher percentage. (It's possible this hiring is a recent trend, though what you've delivered so far doesn't come close to answering that question).
Second, no one said that catchers are being hired in overwhelming numbers - that was your mistaken inference. Your own list of managers indicates that the long-serving managers of the past 50 years are still disproportionally, if mildly so, represented by former catchers.
***
Walt, I think you're underestimating what percentage of managers were historically were ex-backstops. Looking at five seasons...
1951: 38% of games were managed by ex-catchers.
1961: 28%
1971: 8%
1981: 27%
1991: 33%
Girardi.
Girardi.
1) A. J. Hinch, Arizona Diamondbacks - was a catcher for the Athletics, Royals, Tigers, and Phillies between 1998-2004.
2) Eric Wedge, Cleveland Indians - Red Sox and Rockies between 1991-1994.
3) Jim Leyland, Detroit Tigers - catcher in the Tigers' minor league system between 1964-1969.
4) Fredi Gonzalez, Florida Marlins - catcher in the Yankees minor league system between 1982-1987.
5) Mike Scioscia, Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim - catcher for the Dodgers between 1980-1992.
6) Joe Torre, Los Angeles Dodgers - catcher for the Braves and Cardinals between 1961-1970. Became a 3B/1B in 1971 and played until 1977.
7) Ken Macha, Milwaukee Brewers - began minor league career as a catcher but became primarily a 1B/3B/OF.
8) Joe Girardi, New York Yankees - caught for the Cubs, Rockies, Yankees, and Cardinals between 1989-2003.
9) Bob Geren, Oakland Athletics - caught for the Yankees and Padres between 1988-1991 and 1993.
10) John Russell, Pittsburgh Pirates - played catcher along with 1B/OF for the Phillies, Braves, and Rangers between 1984-1993.
11) Bruce Bochy, San Francisco Giants - caught for the Astros, Mets, and Padres between 1978-1980 and 1982-1987.
12) Don Wakamatsu, Seattle Mariners - caught for the White Sox in 1991.
13) Joe Maddon, Tampa Bay Rays - catcher in the Angels minor league system between 1976-1979.
technically, he'd be the 6th, if you count Brandon Hyde's one-game interim stint
My recollection is that he is the same person as Matt Treanor.
He's also a 9-dan Go pro in Japan.
I found this phrasing highly amusing, so I did my first handle change in quite some time.
Page 1 of 2 pages
1 2 >You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.