Roster of Rubbish? I know some people were down on who joined Armisen on stage…but this is ridiculous!
Read More...And Collins’ team isn’t winning. So you should understand why he might be losing it. He turns 64 later this month. He was run out of Houston and Anaheim. There is no next managing job. This is more than his last best chance. It is just plain his last chance to prove he is a good major league manager.
...For if you know whether Collins is a good manager or bad manager based on his Mets ...
Login to Join (3 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.6459 seconds, 111 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Jose Canusee posted on March 01, 2013 at 08:05 AM # hit 0 | hit 02) ???
3) Make playoffs
4) Profit!
That and putting OBP on the scoreboard.
Leyland has already said he wants to see him steal more so you're probably right but why would anybody want to risk a stolen base (with any frequency) in front of Cabrera and Fielder?
Jackson's K-rate did come down substantially (and walk rate up) which is great to see but he still doesn't "profile as a solid contact hitter" with a 22% K/PA rate. Regardless it was an excellent year for Jackson, improved in pretty much every way, and it will be interesting to see if he repeats it.
Being as the Mets apparently think having a leadoff hitter focus on, you know, getting on base -is some radical new idea, it's clear that they're about 25-30 years behind the times. Therefore, I think I want to be wherever the Mets are when the world comes to an end - it should buy me several more years before doomsday comes.
Back in 1984 one of the first things Davey Johson did was promote Wally Backman to bat leadoff and demoted Mookie Wilson from leadoff to batting 6th... and the MSM howled and frothed at their collective mouths...
Eventually Oquendo went bust as a #2 hitter, Mookie got moved up to #2- and to lead off when Backman's platoon partner (Chapman) was playing, Backman stayed leadoff when starting...
but that was then, Johnson was canned in 1990, Vince Coleman was brought in as a FA... and years later Omar Minaya once responded to a question regarding OBP by saying, "that's not something we look at"
Even if true, which I doubt, his teams were built around Beltran, Wright, Floyd, Delgado, Castillo, S. Green, Reyes, Alou, and dozen bit players with strong OBP.
Hard to believe the Reds won the division with their leadoff hitters slashing .208/.254/.327. Choo will be a big upgrade - well worth the fielding tradeoff.
While I yield to no one in my loathing for Minaya's reign, as of 2006 he wasn't clueless regarding OBP, as the quote makes clear. Still and all, that doesn't explain his acquisitions in his last season, which seemed oblivious to the value of getting on base.
"I'm not going to lie to you: Ideally, we'd love to see him improve his on-base percentage," said Mets GM Omar Minaya about Reyes. "In a perfect world, yes, you want your leadoff guy to have a high on-base percentage. But with Reyes you can't just look at on-base percentage. Look at his total bases. This guy hits doubles and triples. That's what I look at when I look at Jose Reyes.
"And can you imagine if he improves his on-base percentage on top of what he is already? My goodness, you're talking about a great, great player."
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/tom_verducci/06/20/reyes/index.html
The quote people are thinking of is probably from before his Mets tenure. From the USS Mariner:
http://www.ussmariner.com/2003/10/06/omar-minaya-the-strip-miner/
A little weirdness in 2007, as reported by Salfino and linked to on BTF:
"The major focus of the Minaya interview was the rumored switch of David Wright to the second spot of the lineup. At one point, Minaya even sought advice from Keith Hernandez on the move (Hernandez seemed somewhat conflicted, though generally supportive). Note that Willie Randolph has batted Wright second almost exclusively of late.
“Our stat guys like Wright batting second because of his historical OBP (on-base percentage),” said Minaya. “He’ll get 50 or 60 more at bats and that’s going to get us more runs when Reyes is on. And he’s easier to get home when he’s on base because he runs well. But what I think about is what happens if Reyes makes an out? Then you have a 100-RBI guy not able to drive someone in. It’s Willie’s decision. I can see how it makes sense statistically. Willie hasn’t told me what he’ll do if Alou isn’t playing that day. Where do you bat LoDuca then?”
http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/newsstand/discussion/sny_salfino4
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.