The Mets’ pythagorian record right now is 50-45. Are they secretly good, or is there a talent-related reason they are so far below that record at 45-50? Wright, Granderson, and D’Arnaud have all begun to live up to expectations. Murphy is better than expected. Lagares has continued to perform at a high level. The starters have been solid, though oversold as a team strength.
Conventional wisdom is that with a record so divergent from the run differential, we should expect a strong second half. Has Sandy been unfairly vilified?
Login to Join (4 members)
Page rendered in 0.5979 seconds, 68 querie(s) executed