Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I still don't get why they'd want to trade Morse.
You have Harper/LaRoche/Span... all left-handed batters where Harper could fill in. If you face two lefties a week and he pinch hits, that's 400 ABs for the year, not even counting him filling in for someone getting injured. There's a very good role for him that maximizes his abilities, minimizes flaws in some of those other players, and improves upon what they'd otherwise do: plug in Tyler Moore. (ugh)
Anyone know the salary for the option year? What are the mechanics of it?
$2 million dollar mutual option. In other words, a pittance guaranteeing an extra $2 million, not a 'real' option for 2015.
@4, sure... but 2 starts a week plus pinch-hitting opportunities isn't quite the same as the role Chad Tracy had last year. 400-500 ABs is easily doable -- keep in mind, IL play means he's almost guaranteed a few extra starts each month -- and not all the dissimilar from what he's had the last few years, given all his injuries.
What I have read is that the $2 million is the buyout, not the amount of the option.
If you face two lefties a week and he pinch hits, that's 400 ABs for the year, not even counting him filling in for someone getting injured.
What should Morse go for? Orioles should be all over this.
Just looked up Michael Morse and this entire time I assumed he was a dorky looking white guy. I don't know why I thought that.
Any reason for the Sox not to jump on Morse and just not sign Napoli?
He was in Pawtucket last year, after being released by the Indians. 264/338/462 in 204 PA. He's now a free agent and someone will sign him as minor league depth.
The Rays look like an obvious trade fit. Jake McGee would be a perfect replacement for Sean Burnett in the Nats' bullpen.
The team raved, RAVED about ALR's defense. And he really was pretty sweet over there in a way that doesn't necessarily jive with some of the WAR components I've seen for him in previous years. Given the problems that often has with fairly evaluating 1B, it's hard to take some of the WAR numbers seriously. He's a solid bat (left-handed to help balance out the middle of the order) with a plus glove. Whatever numbers you want to assign to that, he's an asset at that price. Two years... who cares? It's a win-now team. He's a win-now player.
The Rays look like an obvious trade fit. Jake McGee would be a perfect replacement for Sean Burnett in the Nats' bullpen
I wouldn't trade McGee for Morse. McGee is a really awesome reliever, and just because he's left-handed and now being used in the pen he shouldn't be put in the same category as Sean Burnett or Jerry Blevins. In fact I don't see how he's less valuable than David Robertson. He's arguably a better pitcher with 5 years of team control vs Robertson's 2. For all I know McGee can be converted back to starter. Looking at it in WAR terms, McGee had 1.8 rWAR in 2012, and Morse has 1.8 rWAR per 600 PA in his career. If the Nats managed this, it would be highway robbery.
Both of these points are even more amazing when you consider what the Nats were like as recently as 2010.
0.7, 2.2, -0.1
Morse posted 6.2 oWAR during that span, but coughed up more than half of that on defense (-3.4 dWAR). He needs to get to the AL as quickly as possible.
The team raved, RAVED about ALR's defense. And he really was pretty sweet over there in a way that doesn't necessarily jive with some of the WAR components I've seen for him in previous years. Given the problems that often has with fairly evaluating 1B, it's hard to take some of the WAR numbers seriously.
I always envisioned a fat David Morse.
We saw Morse and family at a local Indian restaurant a couple of years ago. The family lives somewhere close to us, albeit not in our neighborhood. :) The restaurant is a pretty meh place (we won't go back) but it was dark and not crowded, so they might have chosen it for those reasons. His wife is tall and quite attractive; the kids were closely bunched in age (late teens, early 20s) and were tall and attractive.
I read somewhere that the option is for $15m. I'm not sure the structure of the mutual option; does that mean either party can exercise it, or does that mean both parties must agree to it?
As for the structure of the option, yes, it's mutual and therefore both parties have to agree. If either party declines the option LaRoche will automatically get a $2 million buyout
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
Login to Join (2 members)
Page rendered in 0.6844 seconds, 73 querie(s) executed