Read More...When welterweight Floyd Mayweather was No. 1 on Sports Illustrated’s Fortunate 50 last year—knocking out Tiger Woods, who had been No. 1 every year since SI started producing the list in 2004—it looked like a fluke, the result of the $85 million he received for his fights with Victor Ortiz and Miguel Cotto. Now Mayweather is proving that he belongs at the top. From just two bouts this year, one earlier this month and the other scheduled for September, he will earn at least $90 million, ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.1475 seconds, 158 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 2 of 2 pages
< 1 2The former is now dead.
Hey, hey, let's be fair now--they BOTH made horrible fake music.
1. DM used to have a "clutch" setting you could turn on or off. (Maybe still does)
2. This is easy and means nothing. All DM is doing is reproducing the empirically observed distribution. You don't need to identify the source of the variation to be able to recreate it at a sufficiently aggregate level. Monopoly can produce tycoons and paupers through a mostly random process too, that doesn't make it a good model of the economy.
3. You can't use DM for things like this. For example, you can't use DM to test a theory that modern bullpens would be better if the multi-inning fireman role returned because no current relievers are used that way and DM will have them tire rapidly after 5 batters or so. You could change their durability ratings but that's just assuming what you're trying to prove.
For all we know, half of all blown saves are due to "choking." For all we know, that good set-up guy doesn't have the mental makeup to be a good closer and that, not random variation, is why he specifically sucked in his 10 save chances.
With large enough samples, you could start looking for individual effects (i.e. the same guy choking year after year) but few players get large enough samples and that's based on past performance such that only good, generally non-choking players are going to reach that point anyway (selection bias).
As the data gets more detailed (mainly pitch/FX, etc.), we are getting closer to being able to measure individual behavior. But sabermetrics remains mainly actuarial in its statistical approach. The projection systems offer virtually no insight into who will improve/decline from year-to-year but instead apply aggregate aging models and such. That might be reality but likely isn't. That might be a good approximation to reality (I think it probably is). Or it could be missing lots of relevant factors that are (currently) unmeasured.
And I think they both had horrible fake reality shows. The only real difference is one of them obviously had tons of plastic surgery and the other didn't (unless they had a different biological mom or dad).
Dwight Eisenhower and Milton. Milton had a number of jobs in US govt and I think was pres. of Kansas st.
does that count for something?
There's a famous joke at columbia that the trustees said in the late 40's "we need Eisenhower!," and someone accidentally offered the president's job to Dwight.
Which one had the surgeries?
i've always wondered what that household was like. i also read somewhere that their father was in showbiz.
There are the trio of Emmanuel brothers.
Rahm - mayor of Chicago
Ari - big shot Hollywood agent. Model for a character on a show I've never seen called Entourage
Other One - some high profile doctor of some sort.
Michael and Sean Penn.
Is that the guy who plays Funkhouser on Curb Your Enthusiasm?
Bayless...Bayless is a malicious, malevolent sort. He's the guy who tells you that Joe thinks you're a jerk, and when you say, "Joe? I hate that ####### guy," he loudly shouts, "Hey, Joe, guess what this guy said about you?" And then he watches the ensuing fight with a really creepy kind of glee.
I'm genuinely not sure whether Bayless believes everything he says, which would make an hateful idiot, or if he's just a really evolved troll. There's probably no difference at this point.
Ezekiel. He writes a lot of columns for the Times' website. Incredibly smart fellow. Was dragged into the spotlight during the health care fight when Sarah Palin called his philosophy "basically evil."
Sometime in the 60s Carl Reiner was on The Tonight Show, and Carson asked who were the two funniest people he knew; Reiner answered, "Mel Brooks and a 12-year-old kid named Albert Einstein."
He performed under the name "Parkyakarkus." It was back in the days when someone whose act was "pretending to talk in Greek" could have a long, prosperous career!
Sheez, really? Is this Skip Bayless himself writing ridiculous narrative?
Basketball is a team sport like baseball, maybe more so, your team-mates don't get to set you up for easy at bats like a great passer can setup a teammate for a layup or dunk.
Kobe Bryant lives for pressure, he's always ready to take the last shot, in fact he demands it. And because of this eternal ego driven readiness, he almost always refuses to pass the ball to teammates with better opportunities, so he can take often ludicrously horrible shots. And because of that, his clutch time shooting percentage is terrible.
LeBron is great at a diverse set of basketball skills, one of his bet is his passing ability. He will always be the more valuable clutch time performer than a ball hog like Kobe, due to his ability and willingness to find and get the ball to his team-mate with the best opportunity to score.
Page 2 of 2 pages
< 1 2You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.