It’s one thing for Michael the Kay and Sen. Al Leiter to screw this up last night…but the BBWAA high muckety-muck? “Rookie shortstop Adam Rosales smoked a first-pitch fastball to left-center for his first career home run.”
Read More...Sabathia was taken deep on the first pitch of the game. Rookie shortstop Adam Rosales smoked a first-pitch fastball to left-center for his first career home run. Sabathis settled down nicely but needed major help from second baseman Robinson Cano to get out of a fifth-inning ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 0.7656 seconds, 143 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 2 of 2 pages
< 1 2the tigers make the playoffs without playing defense all year and now you complain?
I don't know when Tigers fans became so entitled but it is very annoying.
Concur. I've wondered this myself this season.
the tigers make the playoffs without playing defense all year and now you complain?
Oh don't worry, I've been complaining about it all year. They're horrendous. At least neither Delmon or Raburn is playing left anymore.
I don't think it's "entitlement"; it's just with this team you can never relax. No lead is safe; any ball can be dropped; any opposing pitcher can suddenly look like a Cy Young candidate. It's almost like we're afraid to cheer, as if the baseball gods will hear and punish us.
What's wrong with the Giants?
Sure, it's a very flawed team that seems to make everything (including winning a piss-weak division) as difficult as possible. Still, the 2012 Tigers season has featured a Triple Crown, a Cy Young quality season, Doug Fister King 9 guys in a row, Andy Dirks's neck, WINNING THE DIVISION... we're pretty lucky, considering.
Edit
The Tigers do have a legitimately bad defense, which is frustrating to watch, but the fact that their bullpen isn't impregnable and opposing pitchers are unpredictable, that's just how baseball is.
I note that RMc did not say that any lineup can suddenly look like a murderer's row against their starters. Because the Tigers have one of the best starting rotations in all of baseball. But fans of most other clubs, if they were venting their spleen, would have mentioned that.
He never seemed particularly slow to me when he was in Colorado. FWIW and I'm not sure how much this means, his baserunning runs on bb-ref are pretty average (+2 lifetime), the XBH stats are also pretty average.
Is this the thread where we can talk about Delmon's moustache? It's been months now and it still unsettles me.
...which is surprisingly useless when you have a pathetic offense and an awful bullpen. Detroit allowed just three runs (count 'em) in the first 17 innings in Oakland. They lost both games anyway. So, yeah.
Verlander will probably pitch well tonight. I won't be watching.
Don't remind me I'm rooting for Delmon Young tonight. I can still change.
You are? Tigers fans don't.
I mean, baseball fandom is highly personal, and one's relationship to one's team is completely subjective and one's own business... but... what Greg said in 63.
GO TIGERS
QFT
I felt that way from 1989 through 2006. Then I wanted the team to actually achieve what it was capable of achieving, instead of being satisfied with the mere capability. 2007 and 2009, especially the latter, left a bad taste in my mouth, and those of a lot of Tiger fans. This season was impossible to enjoy, too, because they should have been leading the division all year, or at least within a game or two given the surprising White Sox, but they were several games behind most of the way, and showed no signs of rallying. It looked like a lost opportunity. Mike Illitch isn't getting any younger, and the team will not have nearly as high of a payroll after he goes.
The playoffs are a crapshoot, and I'm the first to say that. But there's a difference between losing while playing like a team that has some business being there and doing what the Tigers have done in this series. Game 2 was an absolute gift. Only in Game 1 did they play remotely decently. If the Tigers had had the series the Reds had, or the series the Nationals and Cardinals have had, and were tied 2-2 or had just lost 2-3, I would be satisfied. Obviously, if they were to win tonight, I'd still find a way to be satisfied, but I don't exactly have to worry about that.
I'm rooting for a Tigers-Giants World Series with a specific ending.
Yes.
You think you guys have it bad? We've been listening to Buck Martinez all year.
I see you, John Halfz. Nice prediction.
Actual:
Verlander 9 IP, 4 H, 11 K, 1 BB.
Parker did made it into the 7th.
I so do not understand this kind of fandom. It sounds unhealthy.
No doubt. I feel weirdly at peace even after last night's loss. There was something immensely satisfying about winning the division against the longest of odds this year. That it was a very fun/likeable team to watch, too, made it even better. I have no idea how good this team will be going forward, but flags fly forever and the AL WEST 2012 CHAMPIONS flag is going to look pretty snazzy.
On the other hand, if they had true home-field advantage (start and end at home), maybe it goes different.
Anyway, if the birds win both their games today, all the 1 and 2 seeds will be out.
I'm not crazy about the higher seed starting on the road, but it seems a minor complaint. The A's just didn't play well enough, especially in game 2.
I think it might have, too. The emotion of the Oakland crowd for game 1 would have been off the chart and may have helped the team. We'll never know, but I think the higher seed has earned the right to start at home. I understand the rationale for doing it the way they do, though.
At peace here as well. The whole thing was such an impossible dream, I can't feel anything but happy about the 2012 squad. The first round losses of the early '00s were gut-wrenching becuase expectations were so much higher. This time, a game 5 appearance was just gravy -- rich, mushroomy, savory gravy -- after a fantastic & giddy second half.
Could've helped snag game two, i guess, but what are you gonna do.
People are PO'ed about that here in Washington also, especially since it meant the cities first playoff game in 80 years was at 1 pm on a wednesday.
But at least this is only for one year./
Of course the flip side is that it could have cost them game 4.
(As a side note, this must have been weird for the Tigers, who were dogpiling on the mound while everyone was chanting for the home team.)
I think this format ended up better for the A's. If the first 4 games go the same way (all home team wins), wouldn't you rather go into game 5 on a 2-game winning streak and a jacked-up crowd, rather than a two-game losing streak and a correspondingly nervous crowd (a la 2002)? Of course, math-wise, it doesn't matter at all, except for the 3-game sweep case where the higher-seeded team loses a bunch of revenue to the lower-seeded team. But none of this affected the series really -- games 1 and 3 were mirror images, games 2 and 4 were mirror images (the A's surely should have won game 2 and the Tigers surely should have won game 4) and the rubber game went to a great pitching performance by one of the league's best pitchers. I'm at peace with the outcome and good luck to the Tigers.
Page 2 of 2 pages
< 1 2You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.