I estimate only 10-12 Primates care about straight NBA players, but with our own thread, we won’t detract from what this site is really about: gay NBA players and craft beer.
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.2456 seconds, 184 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 3 of 11 pages
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > Last ›(1) The larger area within the arc simply creating more space in which the offense operates
(2) The need to respect the 18' jumper, which most NBA players can hit if left completely open, and many college players cannot
(3) NBA players are quicker, and are more able to get out on shooters, so they can leave more space, because they can recover faster.
There is some state- maybe Montana- that still has no shot clock for high school girls. Of course, the NCAA should probably see that as a warning rather than an aspiration.
I think that is because there is more action on the ball. In the NBA, a play is won or lost around the rim rather the ball gets there or not. Unless I'm watching the Timberwolves, I mostly just stare at the charge circle instead of the ball itself. There is a lot more action there.
Very true. They're also smaller and less athletic, so you can really actually see a team run the Princeton offense and see what's happening in real time, whereas when an NBA team runs some kind of modified Princeton offense, it looks much different. Same with the flex. I admit I haven't seen BC recently, but they were literally running what a lot of good high school programs run, only they of course had much better players and were running plays out of it. Either way, I barely understand what most NBA teams are doing, except for the Knicks of course, because it's just Carmelo standing around and dribbling (I kid!).
I'd almost be tempted to go even shorter. A lot of teams appear to have the strategy of being more interested in defense and really struggling on offense. It's just no fun to watch.
And the charge rule is laughable.
The pros are moving to this conclusion as well (it comes up in the recent Ballard piece on Morey) - largely 'cause it is. Low expected value on the shot, even poor offensive rebounding rates. Helps with floor spacing and game theoretic stuff (if you shoot them infrequently enough), but - yeah.
I'd like a 30 second clock and deeper 3-pt line as well.
I could see it. But only cuz the original Dream Teamers are all hitting 50...
(1) Mike Woodson can coach;
(2) J.R. Smith is becoming a steady, all-around player; he gives NY a lot of athleticism;
(3) Sheed can still play; he's such a good defender and despite his hotheadedness, he's a very smart player;
(4) Grunwald did some smart ####. The 3-headed PG is working.
And the Knicks are insane from 3 tonight. 18-40.
Damn Billups...
why, yes, yes it would be wrong. in fact, i'm fairly sure they'll lose both by double digits on the way to a very ugly, very depressing next 2 months.
Wade's been mailing it in this season. Plenty of reporters and commentators saying he's hurt. If he's that hurt, he should just take a few weeks off, because right now he looks as disinterested as Melo last season.
You do know the Illini have a new coach, right?
If Wade's wheels are starting to fall off or if there's a "can't get motivated to be the beta or gamma dog" in Dwyane Wade, LeBron's ability to choose teammates might be an interesting story to his career.
Oh is that when you miss?
Maybe I'm hearing what I want to hear from Kobe, but I'm interpreting a "Man, you guys all know I can't stand Shaq, but at least he delivered compared to my current teammate..."
Well, you tell us, since most of them would be from you! ;-)
[130] is amazing.
Turner did make a big shot at the end there... I thought they were running way too much iso with Turner even when Holliday was still on the court.
on any given night, the sixers' halfcourt offense ranges from mediocre to horrendous, but when that comes up against a defense like boston's, things get real ugly, real quick.
the difference in this game was the number of possessions. the sixers had 10 more offensive rebounds, 9 fewer turnovers and 18 more shot attempts. well, it didn't hurt that pierce and terry went a combined 2/15 from beyond the arc, either.
i guess it's good to see the team battle through adversity and come out on top, but they just are not at all a fun team to watch.
I’ve got Ashlee Simpson’s song “Pieces Of Me.” I listen to that every day to relax me before games.
I mess people up when I’m on the plane listening to Guns N’ Roses’ “Sweet Child o’ Mine.”
I got that song by JoJo called “Too Little, Too Late.” I love that beat.
I’ve got a lot of old-school stuff like Hall & Oates.
Yes. 30pts/23red(10off)/6ast/2blk/2st/2TO. 12/19 shooting (6/7FT). Absolutely carried the team, monster effort. Really fun to watch (first time I've said that about anything Bulls related this year).
I like Walton saying that Simmons' distaste for Kobe was based entirely on not liking Kobe's style. And kudos to Simmons for including that.
woooooooo!!!!! sixers basketball, baby!!
D'Antoni had Bryant and Howard go 43 and 41 against OKC, and Brooks had Durant and Westbrook go 40 and 44 (don't recall who had the 44 and the 40, but I recall the numbers).
Page 3 of 11 pages
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > Last ›You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.