I estimate only 10-12 Primates care about straight NBA players, but with our own thread, we won’t detract from what this site is really about: gay NBA players and craft beer.
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.3962 seconds, 185 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 2 of 11 pages
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > Last ›Pfft. If that's their plan, New Orleans can suck it! ;-)
Nah, they can have the name if they give up the Unibrow.
Perhaps this plays into the perception.
Close, but Utah is the Beehive State not the Hornethive State.
Deal!
Cracked me up for how stupid it was.
Interesting take. Short version- If pro sports are really just about which team is better, then there is no reason for them to have so much cultural importance. Pure entertainment has to enter into the equation pretty heavily. It is probably the best reason for Stern's side that I have heard so far. Stephen Fatsis made a pretty similar argument on Hang Up and Listen podcast too.
if only anderson were getting to the line like love. regardless, kinds of a shame that the pelicants' best two dudes are pfs.
I'm a huge fan Ryan Anderson and I think he will be a very good starter for years, BUT... Jamison was guarding him and he shot 5/8 on threes. Nobody is really as good as they look on their best day.
I'm not being defensive about Love; he isn't even playing very well since coming back from his hand injury too early. Just want to put his accomplishments in context.
re anderson: i prefer the dirk lite comp some have put forth.
He was averaging 18 and 8 with like a 60TS% before this game.
Gary Neal and Splitter had really good games.
Yeah, all the stuff in post 67 seems like why the qualification lite was added in 61. If he did what he did tonight every night he wouldn't be Kevin Love Lite, he'd be Kevin Love.
And I think he can keep that up, just not go for 31 on such sharp shooting except in unique situations.
So...wouldn't that kind of sort of make him something like a Kevin Love-lite?
Fair enough.
Not until he does what Love did in post 17...
Chauncey Billups given a flopping warning for Monday's game.
If so that is almost unbelievable. He was basically as good or better than he'd ever been in '10-'11 and then boom, toast.
I notice Kris Humphries has also taken a step backwards...
Damn Kardashians.
Wilt Chamberlain
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
KARL MALONE!!!!!!
Michael Jordan
Kobe Bryant
(subtle, subliminal homerism added for effect)
Has Kobe ever appeared in a movie? Wilt was legendary in Conan, Kareem had Airplane, Malone had an embarrassing cameo in the gawdawful Soulplane, and MJ of course is of Space Jam fame (infamy?).
Too bad Shaq didn't reach 30,000. He'd have been the most "accomplished" film "actor" of them all.
I'd say there's a bit of a difference between Milwaukee's starters in December and say the Thunder or Lakers (uh) starters in May and June.
EDIT: Upon re-reading, this comes across as more sarcastic than I intended.
Kareem is obviously the best based solely on his work in Airplane, Game of Death, and Baseketball.
What Moses said. Big difference between Milwaukee and a top 4 or 8 team.
LINK
OTOH, I don't see the West looking anything like the current** version. I'd bet on 3 of the 8 right now not making it.
*For posterity, today it's NY/MIA/ATL/CHI/BKN/PHI/BOS/IND.
**MEM/OKC/SAS/LAC/GS/HOU/UTA/LAL
Yes. Absolutely. There is no debate about that.
Hoping the Wolves can sneak in. They are keeping their collective head above water with all of these injuries. Getting Love back at about 80% has helped, but without Rubio, AK, and Budinger (not bothering to count Roy), they are still scuffling. I am hoping they can get in a better rhythm in about a month when Rubio and AK are back and getting used to everyone.
So, seems like that even though Love is a great rebounder, this means that you might want a guy who is good on the OGlass out there with him.
Yeah, that's a good point. He obviously draws the defender out with him, and strictly looking at OREB% does not account for the value of taking the other big away from the rim. Strictly from a rebounding perspective, though, Love is always better than whoever is guarding him, so that's a net loss on the boards.
My general feeling is that men's college basketball has embraced the notion that the 15-20' jumper is a really poor shot -- probably because most players can't reliably hit a long 2. So possessions are more oriented around getting a good look at the rim, or an open 3. And when those aren't available, you get 35 seconds of teams trying to do that, and ending up with a bad 3, or a crappy off-the-dribble chuck at the rim.
Yeah...its nowhere near capable of doing so. I think the question is more of "How do the rules help or hinder the creation of a quality product." For me, long shot clocks enabling long bad possessions, foul limits and charge rules come immediately to mind as reasons I don't find college basketball as enjoyable as I could.
The three point line is far too close, IMO. Despite the fact that the players are smaller and less athletic than NBA players, the court seems smaller and more congested. Forcing shooters out deeper would probably help a good bit.
Page 2 of 11 pages
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > Last ›You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.