Boz pays homage to the gritty, gutsy, scrappy, first place 2013 underdog Yankees:
Read More...Perhaps for the first time in their history, the Yankees now epitomize exactly the kind of team that always used to try to beat them: a group of inspired-by-adversity, too-old-or-too-young, one-last-chance players who band together to prove that baseball is a team game, not just an aggregation of talent and fat contracts.
Put a few all-star seasons, such as Cano’s 31 RBI, Kiroda’s 1.99 ERA and Rivera’s 16 ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.3709 seconds, 182 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 2 of 2 pages
< 1 2Yep. I mean, I enjoy snatching $3 tickets off Stub Hub, but in a perfect world I'd pay a little bit more to get them from the box office. A little bit more, mind you. Not ten times more.
My only guess is that the Yanks feel that they can live with the embarrassment of seeing all those empty seats, and are putting their hopes on better economic conditions bringing back the crowds from 2009.
Personally I think that's a dubious strategy, since in 2009 you had a new stadium, two prize free agents, the best Yankees team since 1998, and plenty of season tickets sold before the full impact of the 2008 crash really set in. Not to mention the fact that the knowledge of all those StubHub bargains is pretty much universal by now.
I think even if the choice is between Maddux and some AAA Call Up you still go with Maddux. Even Maddux in a one and done situation is too close to a 50-50 bet for me to feel comfortable with. Baseball is just not a game that you can go into feeling especially confident in any one game. Weird #### happens so win the game in front of you and hope for the best.
the only reason i found out about it was checking up to see what the ohio university band was doing for 2012, and saw that they did that. ohio u. band did an awesome one for lmfao's party rock anthem last year.
Yes, but Cabrera should win the MVP over Trout because he lead his team to the playoffs and Trout didn't. And yes, I've seen people make that argument in the last couple of days.
"MOTHERF***ING YANKEES."
How much it expresses! How chastening in the hour of pride! How consoling in the depths of affliction!
Yankees chances of winning today: About 75%
O's chances of winning today with Tillman: About 50%
O's chances of winning today with Randy Wolf: 40% maybe?
O's chances of winning a one game playoff with the Yankees in Camden with Tillman: 50%?
O's chances of winning a one game playoff with the Yankees in Camden with Steve Johnson:
O's chances of winning Friday with Tillman in Oakland/Texas
O's chances of winning Friday with Saunders in Oakland/Texas
O's chances of winning Friday with Tillman in Camden
O's chances of winning Friday with Saunders in Camden
It's always been a one-game playoff, and I'm not giving it up just because the postseason is getting bigger. The other games can find their own name.
As to your larger point, competitively speaking, I don't see how it matters much. Now, if you're talking other considerations like fan happiness or cash in Angelos pocket, then sure. But in terms of what gives you the best chance of advancing to the Semi-Elite 8, then having a home game vs. a road game in the play-in game is not terribly meaningful (and whatever edge you gain there you probably give right back since your opponent will have the advantage of not playing the day before, and thus have a more rested pitching staff).
Of course, if you get it, you welcome it. The question is to what extent you use your resources to procure that chip.
That's what happens when we let people decide on their own retarded nomenclature in place of the correct terms for things. If there'd been sufficient push-back when dumbasses started referring to one-game playoffs as "play-in games," there'd be no such confusion when they applied that term to the Wild Card Abomination.
Their shot at the division (if Tillman goes Thursday) is virtually the same either way.
Johnson has an injured knee and is "day-to-day." I believe Showalter intends to skip him this time through the rotation.
I'll take it under advisement. (I'm actually trying to get adjusted to being able to watch online videos at home, having obtained a new laptop last week to replace an 8-year-old desktop that I decided not to pay to have repaired.)
Yep. Between that game and the 4-run extra inning lead the A's pissed away in New York last week...
That game made me question the existence of God.
It would probably be a bullpen game without Tillman. It probably starts with Johnson (his knee has improved) for a few innings, then a couple innings a piece from Britton, Hunter, Arrieta, Matusz, Bundy, Patton, etc. depending on how close the game is, and how quickly the Red Sox get blown out.
How about this for a compromise? The O’s start with a bullpen game, and watch the scoreboard. If by some miracle the Red Sox stay in the game, they can plug in Tillman in the 4th or 5th inning (hopefully after wrecking the Rays lineup with platoonery).
It was bad, sure, but the A's have won so many games FROM OUT OF NOWHERE this year that it didn't bother me as much as it might have.
Gotta take the bad with the good.
I'd only go all-in if there was some hope that winning the division would mean Keith Law would think we're good.
Yeah, this one.
Man, I wish I didn't have meetings today.
Well the fact that it was the Yankees made it worse. I had one of those Wile E Coyote faces with my jaw on the floor after that game was over.
Step 1: Figure out who your best pitcher is, and start him as soon as he has adequate rest.
Step 2: Do the same for your second-best pitcher, and third-best pitcher, and so on.
To do it any other way at this point of the playoffs is over-thinking it. The hope is you're going to be playing baseball for another couple of weeks. Make sure your best pitcher starts as many games during that time as he is physically capable of doing.
Otherwise you are running the risk of giving more October starts to lesser pitchers than to your best pitcher.
That game made me question the existence of God.
If it's any consolation, AFAICT it was the biggest extra inning comeback in American League history. You have to put these sorts of things in perspective. It's not often you get to see that level of History unfold before your very own eyes.
Well, that's part of the point. The playoffs haven't started yet. They still have the option of resting/saving pitchers for the start of the playoffs later this week. The pitcher who starts today will actually have fewer starting chances in the playoffs.
Your theology is askew. The Almighty loves the Yankees and loves America. It's one of the biggest distinctions between Him and Satan.
There's a very low chance (it involves the Red Sox winning) that tonight's game means anything for them.
Amen.
Red Sox jokes aside, tonight's game is not an elimination game; it likely only affects home field advantage for an elimination game Friday.
In fact, if they win and the Yankees lose, the Orioles will have to play an extra game on Thursday, which if they lose they will still have to play that elimination game Friday. So losing at least guarantees them a day of rest Thursday.
Looking at it further, the Orioles' best play might be to try to win tonight for home-field in the wild-card game and cheer for the Yankees to WIN so they get a day off on Thursday before the Friday game. (Winning the division isn't all that great because ALDS home field this year is games 3-5, right?)
But at this point they can't win the division without a tiebreaker game on Thursday. And if they happen to lose that, then they STILL have to play the wild card game Friday, but without any rest and presumably fewer pitchers available.
Actually, if you include the win today, it might be better represented as winning 2 of 3 played three consecutive days, versus winning 1 of 1 after an off day (although my scenario also aimed for a win tonight, meaning it could be characterized as 2 of 2 with an off day in between). And although you don't want to get caught looking ahead -- just getting to Saturday is obviously the goal -- the ALDS would likely start Saturday, right? So you could be looking at a potential four games in four days, and if you're playing all of them to win (best starters, full bullpen) it could get mighty difficult.
It's an interesting balance, to be sure. Who would be lined up to start Thursday? And if necessary, Friday? The quality and availability of starting pitchers would be a huge factor in this decision.
It will be interesting to see how they approach tonight (and Thursday if necessary) -- do you make a struggling starter try to eat innings and conserve the bullpen, etc.?
Page 2 of 2 pages
< 1 2You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.