“Today’s day and age has gotten so crazy. Shoot man, Obama wants to take our guns from us and everything. You got all this stuff going on; it’s just a little bit insane for me, man. I’m not sure how to take it.”
Login to Join (2 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 3.7701 seconds, 187 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 55 of 57 pages
‹ First < 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 >Re: Filibuster... filibusters only count if cloture votes fail. Clotures aren't broken by blind, anonymous votes - in fact, in recent history (last generation or so) - they don't even 'happen'... the party leaders signal whether there will be cloture or not. Votes against cloture that don't result in extending debate are show votes for party bases, nothing more/nothing less.
Re: Recess appointments... Without rehashing discussion from a few pages back, it ought to be noted again that Obama has only undertaken something like 35 recess appointments... but Bush & Clinton were in the 150-170 range. Yes, the 'never out of session' BS tactic was a Reid original, but it's still a BS tactic.
Re: Books... I find my Kindle to be perfect for traveling and perfect for reading a new release or something I just want to read... books that I truly treasure, I like to have a finely bound hardback. I've been increasingly over the last few years building up my library - I don't have the scratch to do any sort of real first edition collecting, but I have picked up some real gems... a very nice two volume War & Peace with some superb etching, a pristine copy of the Conrad Argosy with the Mueller woodcuts (Conrad is probably my favorite English-though-he's Polish author), another really nice Leaves of Grass... I admit that originally, it was mainly a matter of just wanting a 'big boy's bookshelf' rather than the collection of ratty paperbacks with covers missing, and I was a little embarrassed at my attempt at faux-elitism... but wonder of wonder, since I started upgrading my library -- I've found that several times a week, I do pull various selections down and re-read chapters here and there. I just reread the Secret Agent from Conrad last weekend and just last night, was skimming a bit from War & Peace.
That's not the problem
the problem is that the Senate's rules are dysfunctional, they have been dysfunctional for a LONG time, but for the most part the Senate functioned because they were being only sporadically abused, but successive Senates have progressively gotten worse and worse.
The problem is that the rules as they are now, holds and vetoes, etc etc., give individual senators tremendous power, even someone like Bunning who was seemingly irrational and a pariah to most of his own party had the ability to throw a monkey wrench into the works almost at whim. And it won't change until a majority of both parties want it to, which doesn't look like it's going to happen any time soon- what happens if a Majority Leader seriously discusses reform of the Senate's procedural rules? If he seriously pushes it instead of just posturing? A bloc of his own party is gonna split off and make a deal with the other side to prevent it from happening.
At this point the only thing I can see working is for the states to call a constitutional convention for the purpose of amending the constitution to impose functional procedural rules on the Senate- an amendment requiring that appointees be voted on within a certain time period, abolishing or limiting holds, time limiting filibusters, or reducing cloture vote requirements from 60 to 55 (or better yet abolishing the filibuster entirely)- the Senate is NEVER EVER gonna vote for that (2/3 of the Senate would be required for that to pass Congress and go out to the states)
Of course the Constitutional Convention mechanism has never been used (since the first one) due to it's spectacularly unwieldy nature, but State Legislatures due pass resolution from time to time calling for one- trick is to get 2/3 of them to call for one more or less simultaneously
Somebody paid Vernon Wells $126M and it didn't make me rethink my opinion of him as a baseball player.
Yeah isn't the intelligence of the person who paid the money under question and not who got the money?
--------------------------------------
Somebody paid Vernon Wells $126M and it didn't make me rethink my opinion of him as a baseball player.
And while we're at it, didn't Leona Helmsley leave $12,000,000 to her dog?
The thing is there is no provision in the Constitution for limiting the scope or purview of a constitutional convention. A constitutional convention, simply put, is a convention to write a new Constitution. If you only want to change part of it you use the amendment process.
Spoiler:
They won't.
I have hope that there are ways even within the messy system to put some norms back in place that allow things to work at least enough to either move or reject low-level appointments, staff the courts, run the bureaucracy.
January 2013 has actually been the most hopeful moment for this type of thinking in many years, if not more than a decade. It could fall apart in a second! But I'm not sure we need structural change. We need to set 98-2001 as an abnormal time and try to find a path toward something more approaching normality.
I think we're in a period where basically we have to deal with a incredibly petulant and irrational voting bloc where our system essentially requires super majorities to vote down cohesive voting blocs. Essentially the heirs to the Birchers have achieved a measure of power within 1 of our 2 major parties. Until a stake is finally driven into the No Nothings' voting power we;re in fro rough ride politically...
of course the nativist teapers are enevr permanently vanquished , they will come back again in some form later.
That's really insulting to Frenchy
That's really insulting to Frenchy
I'm not sure it's insulting, but I don't think it's quite accurate for either Palin or Franceour. In neither case was the problem one of drive or ambition, it was instead one of fundamental underlying ability.
More
Is that a thinly-disguised threat of military coup?
I'm not sure 9/11 fits in this context. It made politics less unruly and brought us together, albeit briefly. We were debating stem cell research in August and praising Giulianni and GWB with the bullhorn by mid-September.
Sounds like the other way around - the Army is going to sit this one out, so the state needs to figure out how to settle with the protestors non-militarily.
Would the dog have to pay income taxes on the income from the money? Does that mean the dog gets a social security number?
Link
What a bunch of ########.
Did they? They hid their abuse of children much more better than the Catholic Church had. Its a deeply hypocritical stance that they had concerning homosexuality. They consistently said that the reason they don't allow gay men to become scout masters is because of the fear that they might molest boys. And then they hide decades of abuse by their org. Just maddening.
I am sure the money was left in a trust, with the dog as the beneficiary.
I just figured out* how to put PDF files from my laptop onto my kindle. After several years of reading 17th century books online, and the resulting headaches/eye blurring I had enough and decided reading through John Rushworth's thousands of pages of political memoirs on my computer was not something I was willing to do. Now I can do research from my office! (Otherwise known as my bed).
*By "figured out" I mean dropped and dragged the files from my documents folder to my kindle. This may indicate how often I use my kindle for other things.
It sure sounds like this is a bottom line decision in response to losing sponsors, rather than going through some principled change of heart. I was a Boy Scout, but haven't supported the organization as an adult. I still won't.
If you want to be charitable, it's telling Morsi to negotiate/compromise because the Military is not going to bust heads for him any more than it did so for his predecessor.
The trouble is from the Military's POV is this- if your head of state wants you to bust heads and you don't do it- if that head of state hangs on he's going to make replacing you with someone who will one of his top priorities- so yeah this is heading down an ugly slope all around
Depends - if the troops are loyal to the generals, it's awful tough to fire the guys with the tanks.
Depends - if the troops are loyal to the generals, it's awful tough to fire the guys with the tanks.
Yeah, I'm no Egypt expert, but my sense is that Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood wouldn't win in a showdown against the military. I'll freely admit I could be wrong.
EDIT: Coke to GregD
Good news; reports are now that the manuscripts were removed from the two libraries before the city was taken by the Islamists:
http://archaeology.org/news/485-130129-timbuktu-manuscripts-safe
Sorry I missed the on-air shouting match between Akman and Icahn. Sounds like great theater.
Well, thanks a lot Feinstein, you couldn't have waited a week???
I've got to help my parents move this weekend and at least 2 of the guns my dad owns are on that list; so much for avoiding politics ...
And just after I had unlocked all those on Battlefield 3.
It may yet work out --
After the NRA testimony today and the resulting compromise, perhaps Battlefield 3 will be on the list of bannings, too.
See, video games are to blame.
People at the top gets richer the more people they bring in because they have to order the product only from that source. Not from the parent company or any other potential distrubitior. The people on the bottom make little to no money and even Heralife's own business plan says that 'distrubitors' on the bottom are expected to make little to no 'profit'. Its a legal pyramid scheme, and a business I would short the hell out of if I had the money and knowhow because there's no god damn value in their product.
And on queue.....
I'd have thought it would be "on cue". Though I suppose "add it to the queue" would work.
On the other hand if we're being honest I have no clue which is right.
One of the stupidest arguments I ever got into was when I was playing Scrabble with my girlfriend and I played "Queue", which she challenged. I said, "you know, like a line". Which, I admit, was ambiguous as she took that to mean an actor's line ("cue") and was unconvinced.
However, upon looking it up in the dictionary and seeing that a queue is a line as well, she was adamant that I hadn't meant that kind of "line". I suppose she thought I had spelled a word wrong and not only lucked out that my incorrect spelling was itself a word, but also lucked out that it had a definition which matched my claim. Which would be some pretty awesome serendipity.
Mom also was at the same strip mall as the Gabby Giffords shooting, but had left about 30 minutes before.
I forget sometimes that most Americans are not familiar with the word queue. Having studied/worked in software development since high school, I see and use it frequently.
Page 55 of 57 pages
‹ First < 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 >You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.