Read More...The issue of redheadedness and athletic performance took center stage before the 2011 NFL draft, when Sports Illustrated’s Peter King interviewed an anonymous head coach who questioned Texas Christian University product Andy Dalton’s ability to lead a team from the quarterback spot. The scout’s objections were based less on Dalton’s arm strength, pocket presence and his Wonderlic score than his hair color.
“Has there ever been a redheaded quarterback in the NFL who’s really done ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 0.5781 seconds, 87 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 2 of 2 pages
< 1 2Who are the last two Rockies to play 150+ games at the age of 22?
One is easy, the other "shocking"
I like reading Parks; not only is he a good writer, he has his own perspective, and I find that useful. He's similar to Law in that going and seeing a player plays a big role in his thought process. But the top 100 isn't just his list; it is the consensus opinion of the whole "prospect staff," most of whom have not shown any reason for me to care what they think.
Mayo is a journalist who aggregates scouting info. I've never gotten the sense that he's adding anything unique of his own (not necessarily a bad thing). That's not worthless, but it's redundant if you already have BA. His rankings end up fairly different than other outlets, but different doesn't mean useful. Again, the individual team writeups are more interesting, since it can clue you in on guys that have piqued some scout's imagination somewhere, but we are just talking about the top 100. When it comes to value ranking my prospects in my preposterously deep dynasty league, those top 100 lists don't really add anything beyond BA and Sickels.
Hulet... I've been reading him off and on since his Baseball Analyst days, and I've never found him particularly useful. I mean, his info is fine, I suppose, but it has always struck me as just a watered down version of what you get elsewhere, even in his team writeups. He's like the megablocks of prospect guys. He's fine, I guess, if that's all you have; but if you have legos, there is really no point to him. He's redundant.
I don't find "different" choices to be useful as sleeper pick unless the guy naming them as a sleeper has some cachet. I mean, anybody can just throw some crap at the wall and see what sticks.
Since no one guessed, I'll say Tulo and Neifi Perez.
From BBRef, Timo's 0.8 > Neifi's 0.7, in 1/3 of the games.
In a humorous side-note, King Kauffman sponsors Neifi.
EDIT: Measurement is WAR, in case that isn't obvious.
Page 2 of 2 pages
< 1 2You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.