Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
questions like this should always be preceded or followed by questions to determine whether the person has any idea what they're talking about.
Yet there is still a lot of push back against stats like WAR. The majority of fans still don’t trust it or believe in it. A few weeks ago, SportsNation asked on ESPN.com, “Do you consider WAR to be a useful statistic in evaluating baseball players?” The “no” votes outweighed the “yes” votes 63 to 37 percent. It was a landslide rebellion against new metrics.
As I tell my beginning statistics students, such a poll isn't completely worthless--but it's so close to being completely worthless that it might as well be.
The false precision in WAR renders it almost useless.(*)
(*) Under the strict definition of the term, meaning WAR doesn't really tell you anything you can't glean from reviewing data other than WAR.
that makes sense -- and measures actual events
I'll just drop in to say the SBB has no ####### idea what he's talking about.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
Login to Join (8 members)
Page rendered in 0.2919 seconds, 58 querie(s) executed