This is it, the biggest month of the year for soccer. Some key games/dates:
May 2nd: Europa League semifinals—Benfica v Fenerbahce and Chelsea v Basel
May 4th: Final day of the season in England’s second division. Wolves look done but Barnsley will attempt to escape the drop. Meanwhile, Nottingham Forest and Leicester City will try to snatch the last play off spot from Bolton while Hull needs a win to secure automatic promotion or risk losing it to Watford.
May 8th: Chelsea v Tottenham
...Read More...Login to Join (6 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.4988 seconds, 166 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 3 of 36 pages
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > Last ›If you're going to put Liverpool in the money-in/money-out bucket, I think Spurs and Everton clearly qualify as well by whatever measure you choose to make that distinction.
Stoke seem to have bought an awful lot of players and sold comparatively few in the last couple years to be fully self-sustaining unless their revenues have skyrocketed since becoming a regular in the top flight.
If you cut "make their money back on a sale" out of the equation, you could easily consider the Yankees to be a "patronage" when in fact they're a massively successful business because of the appreciation of team prices.
Is that a good comparison? I would have thought the Yankees' payroll:revenue / wages:turnover ratio would be way, way better than that of just about any English football club. Speaking as a Red Sox and Tottenham fan, I would much rather own the Yankees than Spurs. From a business perspective anyway.
Ba: 7mil fee, 5mil agents fees, 6-7mil a year for 4.5 years, can't be insured. He'd cost somewhere between 39 and 42mil in total.
Link.
Holy Toledo!
But I'll be more impressed if this happens during a game the players care about.
I was wrong to use the term "patronage" - my point was more that cutting re-sale / franchise value out of the equation leads to a significantly flawed picture of the financial state of a sports team.
Generally, it seems to me that super rich people really love owning sports teams, and if you own a sports team, you usually have the option of selling it to a super rich person for a lot of money. And with the growing richness of the super rich all over the world, that's only making it a better investment.
I still say there's shenanigans there. Pardew has denied it, but there were persistent rumors that he'd racked up some considerable debts to some regular gambling buddies: Mike Ashley and Derek Llambias.
Generally, it seems to me that super rich people really love owning sports teams, and if you own a sports team, you usually have the option of selling it to a super rich person for a lot of money. And with the growing richness of the super rich all over the world, that's only making it a better investment.
Yeah, I'm on board with all this. I think the earlier point about the lack of relegation risk for American sports franchises making them a lot more attractive as investment vehicles is a good one, though.
There's definitely a vanity aspect to all team ownership, but I think the scales in football are tilted more toward that end of the spectrum (as opposed to the business/moneymaking end) more often than they are in our domestic sports. There are precious few English clubs I'd buy with the expectation of making a lot of money, whereas I'd happily write a check for just about any American team you'd care to name (besides the NHL). Assuming someone would sell me one for like thirty grand, anyway.
EDIT: Ah, coke to Mattbert.
Yeah, I brought this up in last month's thread. It definitely seems underhanded, but, then again, I believe Man U has someone that actually sits on the tribunal that determines these fees so I can't blame Levy for getting sneaky. 6 million for Fryers was a pretty ridiculous fee and Man U shouldn't have been dicks about it. Putting that aside, long term, the FA needs to fix this as it will be smaller clubs that will get hurt by these kind of shenanigans.
Also, with Fryers coming aboard and Adam Smith impressing the hell out of everyone, I think that's about it for Danny Rose as a Spur. Only one goal but he'll always be a legend because of it.
In the NFL, NBA and MLB we wouldn't give pause to a 4/$40M contract to a player with a bum knee. The player would either produce and be worth it or they'd just cut him or pawn him off to another team. A player like Torres would have been cut by now, Andy Carroll and Wesley Sniejder would have been unloaded for late draft picks, etc. But the biggest teams in the biggest leagues in the biggest sport in the world can't afford to eat the money.
He's all ours!
Oh, he does actually drive this. Pics.
I think his hair is enough to oppose this move. It is genuinely disgusting.
As a big time Cleveland Browns fan <cough>Holmgren<cough>, I can second this assessment.
Good assessment of that loss yesterday. Starting both Marin and Moses was ridiculous. Hazard or Mata needed to be out there, especially with our recent history of putting on crap performences against QPR. Marin is a disaster at this point. I don't want to right him off, but he's like a bad, small version of Arjen Robben out there. All he wants to do is cut inside which works 1 out of every 10 times. And he definitely should have been shown the door after that horrific tackle in the 1st. We need to give him back to Werder Breman and take back De Bruyne who looks like the much better player.
Very rarely is the word "disgusting" used to describe a haircut, but it's very, very appropriate in this case. Does he not have friends? A girlfriend? A mirror?
Wow, those pictures don't look good. I've generally been a Mancini apologist, and as a fan of the team I hate to agree, but yeah, that's not okay. What if Balotelli had instinctively responded by pushing him to the ground, or punching him? That would have been the end to Mario's City career, I would think, and it would have been on Mancini.
As much as we can blame Rafa for rotating (which he could never get the hang of at Liverpool either), they were playing QPR. Chelsea even with four or five non-regulars, who still are very good players, should have taken all three point relatively easily.
I haven't seen much of Debuchy besides his highly impressive international performances in Euro 2012 and that qualifying draw against Spain, but he looked like one of the best players on the pitch in almost all the games I saw. That's a pretty huge get. Newcastle may be paying for some unproductive years down the line in order to bring him in now, but it makes some sense for the Magpies to take on a little future risk now with relegation a looming present risk.
This summer I rode up the C&O canal from DC and then cut over through southern Pennsylvania, some of the most back-country territory on this side of the Appalachians, and I saw like 3 Barca jerseys and a handful of other Euro teams. That felt to me like things have changed pretty drastically in the last 5 years.
You need to look deeper than one single transfer and signing. The EPL numbers stack up comfortably to those of major US sports. just a cursory 30 second google search turns up this for 2010/11:
That's a wage bill of about $310m for Chelsea. The average EPL team seems to be around £60m just short of $100m. That's not including transfer fees, where EPL teams tend to be huge net spenders, and i assume not including agent fees.
I think there's hope for Chamakh. He's had his moments for Arsenal and then never really got a run when RVP got healthy. Chamakh and Cole seem like very un-Big Sam kind of players, which is interesting. Humorously enough, David Sullivan's son took to twitter to apologize to Hammer fans for the Chamakh signing.
Joining up in July. I am 1. kind of surprised as this came out of leftfield 2. Shocked Spurs concluded negotiations in the first week of the window.
Not sure what this means re: the Moutinho or Sissokho rumors, though. With Vertonghen, Kane, Parker and Holtby, Spurs are putting together quite the RAF unit. Good, clean-cut lads, one and all.
edit: Coke to Mattbert. I lose spending time being snarky. As usual...
Your snark is always worth the wait, big guy.
Don't forget Carroll in that RAF unit. Parker appears to have converted Michael Dawson to the straight and narrow as well. He's been rocking the smart part recently. Next up: Sigurdsson or Lloris.
There are lots of issues with the data, including how you define a team in a sport without roster limits and how one treats bonuses, tax equalization and image rights deals and exchange rates, but those don't detract from the conclusion that clubs at the top of the European leagues spend a lot of money on payroll.
Hey now. Frogs don't have the bottle.
"I dare say, a gentleman with such a respectable hairstyle would never lower himself to simulation! You have my confidence, good sir; a penalty it is."
Well, Chamakh's tag was always "good in the air", which seems like a very Big Sam thing to be, so maybe he's been purchased to further the aim of scoring on every single set piece?
Page 3 of 36 pages
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > Last ›You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.