Read More...Shaughnessy is too good to have to invent anything. He neither invented anything in this instance nor accused Ortiz of using steroids and their cousins. What he did was take his skepticism and his curiosity, good traits for a newspaperman to have, and ask Ortiz about steroids. Ortiz’s responses did not indicate anger of being accused of wrong doing.
I would compare the Ortiz column to the columns I have written about Mike Piazza and my suspicions about his possible use of steroids. I ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.8053 seconds, 189 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 2 of 3 pages
< 1 2 3 >That should raise some skepticism, but FWIW Gio Gonzalez's dad confirms he worked with Bosch, allegedly so he could lose weight, not so his son could use any products.
Is any of the stuff he reportedly received ("Order 1.c.1 with Zinc/MIC/... and Aminorip. For Gio and charge $1,000.") banned?
There was also this FTFA:
He could have faked the famous athlete ones and added them to the legit entries, but the report goes beyond simply relying on a disgruntled employee.
In regard to content, this is pretty lame. It's not good for anybody to have more of this coming out. I foolishly hoped/thought it might be done, at least for now.
Sure. Think back to the drug wars of the mid-80s. The commissioner can use things that are a matter of public record in the disciplinary process. (see for instance the fallout from the Curtis Strong affair)
Now there are limits to his powers of discipline in this area. The commissioner tried to suspend Pascual Perez for a full year based on his arrest and it got rolled way back.
I don't insist that the commission would win the inevitable grievance though. This is uncharted territory given that there's formal testing. I suspect an arbitrator would want more than "he's a client", but that he'd want at least a plausible explanation from the player for his dealings with the company (which could be as simple as "convenient and reliable". Their core business might well be PEDs but that doesn't mean that's all they did)
There's a lot more than an "anon[ymous] guy" providing "implausibly detailed notes to [a] reporter" here:
cmon, galvis is a 22 year old guy - you seriously expect him to gain no weight/muscle from age 17 on? he is hardly canseco
and his stats hardly show all this increased power
FWIW, those mid-80s drug suspensions were rolled back too by a judge, at least in the case of the year-long suspensions for cocaine use for Willie Wilson, Jerry Martin, Willie Aikens and Steve Howe in 1984.
Probably, although it should be noted that New Times is a weekly, and it's not uncommon for publications like that to be marked as being an edition for a future date. For example, you sometimes get March magazines in February.
The source would not confirm if the Schafer investigation was an offshoot of the hotline, but the source did say the line was available to anybody in baseball with access to its private code, including players, managers and front-office personnel. Tipsters can also report rules violations through a secure Web site.
The hotline goes directly to the Department of Investigation, said the source.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/baseball-anonymous-hotline-nab-steroid-cheats-article-1.278822#ixzz2JNlQt6aV
Does this system presuppose that a player can be "caught" through investigative means rather than drug testing? Without knowing the protocols for the actions from such tips, it's hard to say.
Ah got it. I've never come into contact with the paper, I thought it was a day to day.
MLB's record in drug arbitration hearings was not very good, but it wasn't quite zero.
Oh, how I long for simpler times when drug conspiracies centered around people of obvious and undeniable virtue.
ISO disagrees: .049 -> .050 -> .056 -> .078 -> .114 -> .137 (Majors)
He was reported to have put on muscle before 2012, FWIW.
I did lay out a caveat: "Maybe it's natural, maybe not. "
You are not laying out a caveat. I don't see how you can be so sure.
fwiw
@GioGonzalez47 I've never used performance enhancing drugs of any kind and I never will, I've never met or spoken w/Bosch
Could be. Although he seemed pretty determined to come back strong after the end of last season. If these allegations hold up reasonably well, he can kiss the HOF goodbye. "Albatross" is right.
Such as, for example, the good folks of Downton Abbey?
This may have been one of the best sequences in BBTF history.
2008: 89.7
2009: 91.6
2010: 92.2
2011: 92.8
2012: 93.3
It is unclear at this point how involved the Nationals' starter was with the clinic. Gonzalez was unable to be immediately reached for comment and the Miami New Times' report doesn't address him with nearly as much detail as it does players like Rodriguez and Cabrera, though noting his name appeared five times in what was believed to be the owner's ledger
Gio from Deadspin today
restates what Howie said already, sorry, Howie
What a collapse at the end if true, though.
Lots of Hispanics in Miami? Shocking!
From "Best non-steroid hope to break Bonds record" to "Manny Ramirez has a better chance now of getting into the HOF"
Pretty sure Conte has spokena about how one should be able to take testosterone and be very difficult to catch because it leaves the system so quickly.
FTFY.
(also alluded to in [86])
How does it work if it leaves the system fast? Do you have to take it every day?
Primey.
My understanding is that you'd take a short-acting Testosterone after a game or after workouts to help you bounce back quicker than normal.
"Tip one: Wear a watch. Tip Two: Keep your cellphone handy. Tip three: Know your glowtime, how long you'll test positive after you take the substance. What you'll notice is that none of these things is particularly difficult to do."
(Keep the cellphone handy because the team trained in the same place. Anybody associated with the team who saw a tester -- and they knew them all -- would call.
"If you were careful and paid attention, you could dope and be 99% certain that you would not get caught."
On one occasion Hamilton heard a knock on the door when he was glowing, and simply hid inside the house in silence until the tester gave up and went away.
And #91 a lot of PEDs aren't directly testable because they're stuff your body produces. So you look for the chemical traces of (say) a synthetic nandrolone. And that (in the currently popular PEDs) is designed to leave the system quickly.
And no, you don't have to take the PED daily. Or even all that frequently. That's the key to beating the testing.
Jeff Passan: Yanks won't be able to void contract
http://www.radiolab.org/2009/nov/30/from-benford-to-erdos/
Until I clicked the link, I thought you were implicating former Yankees reliever Todd Erdos for doing PEDs.
What's implausible about a doctor writing down dosing regimens?
A lot of the documents referred to in the New Times article are billing records. Not hard to believe at all -- the guy's supplying the drugs and wants to get paid for them. The motivation for leaking these records to the paper is also clear -- the guy skated on his bills and left his partners high and dry.
Anyone want to apply Benford's Law to the numbers appearing in the notebook?
Hmmm ... I'm not sure how well Benford's law would apply to prices. The same phenomenon that underlies Benford's law (that numbers you make up in your head will not be distributed the way numbers usually are) is similar to the process of assigning prices, probably especially in small businesses and shady businesses and cash businesses. There are a lot of $500 and $1000 per week quoted in the article but he's not gonna price a week's supply at $476.67. You might get farther verifying that two people receiving the same stuff were being charged the same.
Given their history, I'm guessing the Bosches will be having lots of conversations with the IRS but will get the standard wrist slap for the PED distribution.
Page 2 of 3 pages
< 1 2 3 >You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.