Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Won't go anywhere, I expect, but I do wish MLB would modernize its territorial framework, particularly for those areas that are prevented from getting much of anything thanks to goofy territory geographies.
Where I live, Extra Innings and TBN black out Reds, Indians and Pirates games, plus TBN blacks out some that seem to be random.. I have no problem with them blacking out the Reds or Indians since those are available on the teams cable network, but Pirates games are not available at all. I am still not over them blacking out Stephen Strasburg's debut last year.
Hell, 42% of San Diego County can't even watch a Padres game right now. Time Warner isn't showing them due to a dispute with Fox, and yet they are still blacked out on MLB.tv.
On Wednesday, several baseball fans filed a class-action lawsuit against Major League Baseball and some of the league’s broadcast partners, including Comcast and DirecTV.
On Wednesday, several <strike>baseball fans</strike> lawyers filed a class-action lawsuit
Virtually all class-action suits are lawyer-driven, not plaintiff driven.
This is a big fail. Not only does baseball have an antitrust exemption, but the Sports Broadcasting Act expressly allows the things they're complaining about.
Extra Innings is a great deal for those that are just blacked out of a local team that they can watch on the team's cable network (or "free" TV). It's a shame that MLB has extended the blackout territories into areas that do not actually receive those games and/or are too distant for many to actually attend the games. MLB surely loses revenue with these policies.
Virtually all class-action suits are lawyer-driven, not plaintiff driven.
This is a big fail. Not only does baseball have an antitrust exemption, but the Sports Broadcasting Act expressly allows the things they're complaining about.
I'm confused, are these lawyers pretending to be baseball fans (class-action suits are lawyer-driven), or baseball fans pretending to be lawyers (a real lawyer would realize this case will never succeed)?
I'm confused, are these lawyers pretending to be baseball fans (class-action suits are lawyer-driven), or baseball fans pretending to be lawyers (a real lawyer would realize this case will never succeed)?
Lawyers who are using baseball fans to get a paycheck.
11.bobm posted on May 14, 2012 at 09:04 PM #hit 0 | hit 0
2012 WL 1609215 (S.D.N.Y.) (Trial Pleading)
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
Fernanda GARBER, Marc Lerner, Derek Rasmussen, and Robert Silver, representing themselves and
all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
v.
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL, Major League Baseball Enterprises Inc., MLB Advanced
Media L.P., Directv LLC, Directv Sports Networks LLC, Root Sports Pittsburgh, Root Sports Rocky
Mountain, Root Sports Northwest, Comcast Corp., Comcast Sportsnet Philly, L.P., Comcast Sportsnet
Bay Area, L.P., Comcast Sportsnet Chicago, L.P., Yankees Entertainment and Sports Networks, LLC,
Athletics Investment Group, LLC, The Baseball Club of Seattle, L.P., Chicago National League Ball Club,
LLC, Chicago White Sox, Ltd., Colorado Rockies Baseball Club, Ltd., New York Yankees Partnership,
The Phillies, L.P., Pittsburgh Baseball, Inc., and San Francisco Baseball Associates, L.P., Defendants.
No. 12 CIV 3704.
May 9, 2012.
Jury Trial Demanded
Class Action Complaint
Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP, Michael M. Buchman, 100 Park Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY 10017,
Telephone: (212) 661-1100, Facsimile: (212) 661-8665.
Edward Diver, Howard Langer, Peter Leckman, Langer, Grogan & Diver, P.C., 1717 Arch Street, Suite 4130, Philadelphia, PA
19103, Telephone: (215) 320-5660, Facsimile: (215) 320-5703, Attorneys for Plaintiffs Fernanda Garber, Marc Lerner, Derek
Rasmussen, and Robert Silver.
Plaintiffs Fernanda Garber, Marc Lerner, Derek Rasmussen, and Robert Silver, by and through their attorneys, file this
Complaint against Defendants and allege as follows:
13.boteman posted on May 15, 2012 at 02:53 AM #hit 0 | hit 0
Attorneys for Plaintiffs...Marc Lerner
What would the owner of the Washington Nationals gain by joining this class???
Oh, OK. :-) There.
I agree that this is tilting at windmills, but I agree with their sentiment and wish them at least some publicity to push the immovable object that is MLBAM a micrometer off their intransigent position, at least.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Don Geovany Soto (chris h.) posted on May 14, 2012 at 05:43 PM # hit 0 | hit 0Union Tribune story
Good luck.
DB
This is a big fail. Not only does baseball have an antitrust exemption, but the Sports Broadcasting Act expressly allows the things they're complaining about.
This is a big fail. Not only does baseball have an antitrust exemption, but the Sports Broadcasting Act expressly allows the things they're complaining about.
I'm confused, are these lawyers pretending to be baseball fans (class-action suits are lawyer-driven), or baseball fans pretending to be lawyers (a real lawyer would realize this case will never succeed)?
Lawyers who are using baseball fans to get a paycheck.
http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/uploadedFiles/Reuters_Content/2012/05_-_May/Garber_MLB_Suit.pdf
What would the owner of the Washington Nationals gain by joining this class???
Oh, OK. :-) There.
I agree that this is tilting at windmills, but I agree with their sentiment and wish them at least some publicity to push the immovable object that is MLBAM a micrometer off their intransigent position, at least.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.