Ho-hum. Another night, another Mitch Moreland home run.
If you’re scoring along at home, that makes Mitch 10, Internet Trolls and Media Infidels 0.
Count me in that latter category, I must confess. I thought the real Mitch Moreland was the one we saw for three years and in the first three weeks of this season — a .264-hitting kind of guy, who couldn’t hit lefties and infrequently drove in an important run.
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.2207 seconds, 184 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 1 of 2 pages
1 2 >Enemy Forces engaged in battle!
Johnston in Full Retreat!
3 Days of Horror!
10,000 Rebels slain!
Richmond Ours!
Weakened legs and blindness can't be good for baseball.
But the hairy palms will save money on batting gloves...
To Jesus.
Finding wedding presents for those guys was even tougher than usual.
Player going well: his issues are seen as just peripheral ones.
Player not going well: his issues are seen as central ones.
Since the dawn of baseball.
Yes, since 2004.
Hamilton's issues were especially central in 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006.
Sounds like he has been ####### Annies on road trips.
I don't think that's it. Here are Hamilton's quotes from a few days ago:
The "it may be a small thing to you" comment wouldn't square with serial marital infidelity unless he has a really low estimation of the media. Nor do I think he would be "cool" or "really good" if that's what was going on.
Maybe he finally had to owe up to breaking the vase because he was playing ball in the house.
Maybe someone came forward with a kid that they said was his? Or a positive amp. test (although for Chrissake, Hamilton shouldn't be doing amps)?
Jesus no hit curveball!
Hamilton seems like he'd be tiresome to hang out with, but he's a joy to watch play baseball when he's going well and since the chances I'll ever meet him are effectively zero, so that's good enough for me. It must be weird to be a ballplayer and suddenly have a receptive audience for any thought that comes into your head.
Sounds like he has been dabbling with monophysitism.
I am afraid to google that, but I will...
BORING!
Two physts would be too much. And thanks for increasing our vocabulary, Chef!
Ain't nothing boring about monophysitism. Are you also bored with arianism?
I always thought it was interesting that arianism died out, but the Copts have kept monophysitism alive for over a thousand years.
Indeed, all points.
And while I do wish him well in his struggles, he's been a self-absorbed PITA about it for quite a while. The no-champagne-cuz-it-will-deliver-Satan-through-my-skin-pores is Exhibit A.
Less gabbing, more stabbing!
Only A's prospects do that.
All kinds of Angels fans are praying that this is the case.
That way he's hitting, screw that. Keep playing him Wash!
barf. I'd just bothered to get excited about that guy too. Why couldn't he steal bases for the lord?
Bob Bonner, who was featured on the 1982 future Oriole stars card along with Cal Ripken and Jeff Schneider, became a Baptist missionary in Zambia after his baseball career. He now lives back in the US.
No doubt he was mixing fabrics. Wait until he starts wearing his 100% wool uniforms in Texas in August. Everyone will know when that happens.
A lot of athletes do it after their career, but Grant Desme was a hot prospect when he abruptly retired to become a priest.
Or playing pepper with his psalter?
Perhaps he needs to wear a hairshirt.
It is interesting, but I think that the causes are historical rather than theological, and thus slightly less interesting:
- Monophysitism was home-grown in Egypt, while Arianism took root in among German tribes for whom it was not a native belief, and thus is more easily cast off.
- The east was in antiquity far more urban cosmopolitan than the west, which allowed for a greater array of beliefs to exist cheek-by-jowl. This was especially true in the 6th and 7th centuries, when Arianism was dying and Monophysitism wasn't.
- The east was the home of Christianity while the west was its "colony", if you will. Colonies are often less diverse than the homeland (e.g., American English has many fewer accents than English English).
- Egypt was conquered by the Caliphate in the 640s. There were lots of political incentives for a Lombard king to drop Arianism for Nicene Christianity (and to force his subjects to come along). The Egyptian Monophysites had a lot of incentives to convert to Islam, but there was no good reason for them to drop Monophysitism if they wanted to remain Christian. Muslim authorities generally weren't especially interested in Christological niceties, and all docile, taxpaying Christians looked the same to them. This factor is significant because the step from Arianism to Nicene Christianity is much, much smaller than the leap from Monophysite Christianity to Islam. For the average 7th century Lombard believer, the former would mainly involve a small alteration in the words of the Mass, not much more. The jump from Christianity to Islam is of course very significant even to the simplest believer.
I'm not saying that if the Caliphate had taken over Lombardy in 642 then we would have Arian Christians around today, but I think it's entirely possible that if Islam had never happened (the largest counterfactual proposal I can think of) then the Copts would just be Orthodox Christians of one type or another.
Or playing pepper with his psalter?
The pellet with the poison's in the vessel with the pestle.
Page 1 of 2 pages
1 2 >You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.