Wait….I had something for this.
Read More...Cubs outfielder Alfonso Soriano told reporters on Monday that he’d accept a trade to “six or seven” other teams (ESPN Chicago).
As Paul Sullivan of the Chicago Tribune reminds us, Soriano last year had the chance to approve a trade to the Giants, eventual winners of belt and title, but opted not to do so. This time around, Soriano adds that he’d give the go-ahead for a team in the “east or center,” so perhaps nothing’s changed when it comes to his willingness ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.1370 seconds, 140 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. PASTE Thinks This Trout Kid Might Be OK (Zeth) posted on July 31, 2012 at 07:17 PM # hit 0 | hit 0Of course I don't understand all the rules about the draft pick budget system. It seems to me that if you have a maximum total amount you're allowed to pay your draft picks, you should try to have as few draft picks as possible so you can draft a few really good players and give them large bonuses.
But that's not how it works, every pick has the right to offer a certain amount of money attached. Grabbing picks is always right.
EDIT: It would be even more fun if you could split the slot money from the pick and trade them separately. Say you want the money to give to Appel, while the Marlins want the pick itself but don't need the right to spend money they don't intend to spend anyway...
OK, then this trade is not good. Acquiring a 29-year-old who may be an improvement over Casey McGehee at first base is not an achievement with a high degree of difficulty.
Aren't baseball draft picks something like the least-sure bet in pro sports drafting?
By miles and miles. Doesn't change the fact that you can get a future star with the 52nd pick, which makes it more valuable than Gaby Sanchez's services.
This is the problem with employing Casey McGehee: after a few months of him anything else starts to look like an alternative worth paying for.
(Insert Walter Young joke.)
Eh. Maybe I'm alone in this, but it seems to me even an incremental improvement for a team going for their first playoffs in over a decade and a half is worth a draft pick that might end up never making it out of AA.
I'll defend the Wandy trade (even though I personally would not have made it) and I like the Snider trade. The Sanchez trade, not so much. This is definitely a case where the asset could have been left in their pocket.
That's all assuming Sanchez is the near-worthless commodity he appears right now to be. If the Pirates sincerely think there's potential for him to turn around and become even an average first base bat, the trade looks a LOT better then.
You mean exactly like the Cardinals?
They probably aren't good enough to make the playoffs, but with there being 70 or so games left in the season, there is a very good chance that it won't be their skill level that shows up the rest of the season. They have a chance of being lucky, and that is all it will take to get into the post season(at least a one game post season) I don't know how many games they have left with the Cubs and Astros, but there is a decided advantage to being in the NL Central.
except the Cardinals didn't get a pick, they were in the lottery for the pick though.
Exactly!
No really, it's possible someone in the Pirates' organization has seen film or something and is convinced he can fix what's wrong with Sanchez, and actually can. It's unlikely, but possible. Maybe they made this trade because they think they can fix something specifically about his swing.
The alternative is they made this trade because... well, because the fans expect us to make a trade, dammit, and he can't be as bad as Casey McGehee, right?
I'd guess it's partially that, and partially Gaby Sanchez can't be as bad he's been.
the thing about it was, the Pirates didnt even want Thompson. Right? If I recall, originally it was a deal for Jim Spencer (he retired in '82 though) or someone like that. I dont even know who they were giving up but it made no sense. And the Commissioner nixed it because, you know, it's Jim Spencer what the hell are you doing? So he made them get someone else and somehow they got Thompson who I think had some off the field problems as well.
yes kids, once upon a time the Commissioner could stop trades in the "best interests of baseball." It's such a quaint notion to look at it now. Like amateur olympics or a landed aristocracy.
the thing about it was, the Pirates didnt even want Thompson. Right? If I recall, originally it was a deal for Jim Spencer (he retired in '82 though) or someone like that. I dont even know who they were giving up but it made no sense. And the Commissioner nixed it because, you know, it's Jim Spencer what the hell are you doing? So he made them get someone else and somehow they got Thompson who I think had some off the field problems as well.
yes kids, once upon a time the Commissioner could stop trades in the "best interests of baseball." It's such a quaint notion to look at it now. Like amateur olympics or a landed aristocracy.
EDIT I see now, Thompson traded by Cal for Ed Ott (30 yr old C on the down side) and Mikey Mahler (a pitcher who was mainly a fun guy to have around) This was in April '81; and the Yanks finally got rid of Spencer (a year away from retirement) a month later. I think it was supposed to be some sort of three way deal originally, maybe it involved Thompson winding up in NY?
I appear to be in the minority in acknowledging that the 2012 Pirates are not good enough to make a playoff run.
There's no such thing as "not good enough to make a playoff run" IMO. All it takes is a few hot weeks and anyone with enough talent to make the playoffs has enough talent to do that.
While this is technically true, I think it's strange and (to me) unexpected that this would be the general BTF feeling, that the Pirates have a pretty good chance because they're in position right now and with just a little luck they're there. Not saying you're wrong to think that way... I just expected more jaded cynicism. But I guess they're the freakin' Pirates and it's just so cute and inspiring to see them in contention in August and everyone is rooting for them. It actually warms my icy black heart. Just a little.
It's interesting and amusing the extent to which so many people like any "buying" trade the Pirates make just because it's so much fun to see the Pirates in a position to buy.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.