Read More...MLB Network’s exclusive English-language telecast of the 2013 World Baseball Classic in the United States begins this Friday, March 1 at 11:30 p.m. ET and continues with all 39 games of the tournament through the Championship on Tuesday, March 19 at 8:00 p.m. ET. MLB Network’s Bob Costas, Jim Kaat, Joe Magrane, Harold Reynolds, John Smoltz, Matt Vasgersian, Tom Verducci and Matt Yallof are among the group of announcers scheduled to call the tournament, produced by MLB Network in the United ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.1314 seconds, 142 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 4 of 4 pages
< 1 2 3 4Coors is like that too. It seems like no one drinks the non light version.
Though it rarely happens, there have been times when I have ordered Bud at some awful bar because it was the best option. The other options were of course something like Bud Light and Coors Light.
Isn't Budweiser the best selling beer? I detect some elitism here at BBTF. Shocking.
Yep I've been to a few places like that.
Budweiser is my beer of choice when I'm mowing grass, cutting brush, or doing any outdoors general property maintenance. It's cheap, light but not too light, has a tolerable taste, and perfect for having a few while working outdoors without getting too buzzed.
This bit doesn't work, because there's the second ad where the husband is trying to speak to his kid about the "DVR at 100% Capacity" message.
There is also a 3rd commercial, referenced in #128, in which the Hapless Husband is further emasculated by the Cable Conflict Box seizing his pants. Two kids make an appearance in that ad, which I've only seen on a football telecast.
For those situations, I go with Miller High Life, "The Champagne of Beers".
I don't hate it because it's terrible, mass-produced swill. I hate it because Adolphus Busch stole the entire schtick, lock stock and barrel, from a much better brewery (i.e. Budweiser Bier Bürgerbräu) and then went to court to block that brewery from using their (stolen) name for marketing in the US. That's almost "cartoon supervillain" level of evil.
I mean, the name "Budweiser"? BBB has used it since 1795 because their beer was brewed in the city of Budweis in the kingdom of Bohemia (currently known as ?eské Bud?jovice, and now part of the Czech Republic). The "King of Beers"? That's because BBB was, at one time, the official beer supplier to the court of the King of Württemberg. And so on...
Bud *Light* is the best selling beer in the U.S.. It has almost 20% market share and sells more than twice as much as the #2 beer (Coors Light, which unseated Budweiser for #2 last year).
I'm not a beer snob, but those numbers were absolutely shocking to me the first time I saw them.
Budweiser is terrible beer IMO. And nobody I know drinks it thusly I cannot imagine going to a bar with 3 friends and everyone ordering the same crappy beer. Most of my friends drink Rainier (local to the NW), PBR (the hipster wannabees) or some random microbrew that I've never heard of...but really I'm just a whiskey man now.
I've never had any beer by the Miller Brewing Company that I would purposely drink again. I just can't stomach MGD, Miller Lite, etc. Yet I can down a few 16oz Budweisers while playing a doubleheader. Go figure.
I don't much care for any of their other beers, but High Life is OK, as mass-market beers go.
Don't you mean the "Sham Beer of Bottled Pain"?
Bud and Bud Light are made using a relatively high rice content. High Life is the best of the <$1/bottle beers.
That's his girlfriend.
Lassus, I read that with my Tom Waits voice, adding a little chuckle on the end.
That list is insane. I expected Bud Light would be #1, but their total dominance is surprising, and I had forgotten Keystone Light even existed.
It's the vanilla ice cream effect. Great national distribution, it's everywhere and it's cheap.
The beer company that the big boys have to look out for is Yuengling. If they ever decide to seek outside investors and expand aggressively they'll take a huge cut of the market share away from the Bud/Miller companies. They'll be this generations Coors if they ever do that. So far they have seemed to be pretty content with staying a family business that expands slowly and safely.
That's a good point. Yuengling is much better than the Bud/Miller/Coors light, and I think the retail price is comparable if not equal.
When I was in my early 20s, despite being with a few 100 miles of the brewery, it was hard to find Yuengling at a convenient or grocery store in central WV (bars and liquor stores carried it though). Now it's in every mom and pop shop, right next to the national brands.
Yuengling already IS this generation's Coors in the sense that its a regional hit that people outside the region clamor for. However, this generation has a wealth of craft beer at their fingertips, so the appeal of Yuengling isn't that "It is a great beer, but you can only get it in one part of the country," like Coors, but rather "It's the same price as Bud/Miller/Coors and it actually tastes alright."
Yuengling will be expanding westwardly soon. They came close to buying an old Coors plant in Memphis a year or two ago, but backed out because they weren't completely sold on the details. They'll buy or build a new plant somewhere on the western edge of their distribution footprint soon here but, as you said, they are all about slow and safe, they'll probably wait til they find a deal that is too good to pass up.
Do you think they will go west before they go north to New England?
Pretty much, although I don't really think it's significantly better than Bud/Miller/Coors. Given a choice of those four, I guess I'd pick Yuengling, but without much enthusiasm. It'd have to be a VERY limited bar/booze shop that didn't have better options given the wealth of craft and local brews out there nowadays.
I think so. I'm not all that knowledgable about the New England beer market, but it seems like there is more competition there with Narragansett, Sam Adams and a few others already being budget mainstay type beers. Plus, Yuengling has already by-passed New England in favor of expanding southernly and westwardly over the last decade. I would assume Texas, America's most beer selling-est state, might be the next target, though of course Shiner already occupies a large, Yuengling-like role there.
Kentucky and Indiana would be easy, but less rewarding, states to expand into. Moving into Texas would probably require a new plant in the area, like that failed Memphis idea, but Kentucky and Indiana might be able to be served by an increase in production in Pottsville.
Man, imo Yuengling is a huge step above Bud/Miller/Coors. Although, for me, if I have a gun to my head, I go MGD, then Budweiser, then pull the trigger, then Coors. Coors is just terrible beer.
When I was starting college at Clemson, Yuengling wasn't distributing to South Carolina. They entered the market when I was junior, and took over virtually overnight. It was almost certainly the second highest selling beer at bars behind Bud Light after about a month. It wouldn't surprise me if it did the same thing in other markets.
As noted above, it's non-awful and has a price point as good or better than the macro-brews. You could, and can, get Yuengling for about the same price as the Natty lights of the world in and around Clemson.
I've always thought of Coors Banquet/Coors Heavy as a somewhat richer, maltier, vaguely Helles-like (I mean, as far as macro lager goes) macro lager and, thus, a bit more interesting than Bud Heavy.
Coors Light, on the other hand, does seem like the lightest of the Big 3 light beers. It is the coldest tasting after all!
I'm a big craft beer geek, but I'm not above drinking some light beer. When it comes to light beers though, I don't understand why people buy anything other than the cheapest option. They're all the damn same. Busch Light and Bud Light are virtually indistinguishable, and anyone drinking either isn't trying to notice anything about the taste of the beer anyway, so it tickles me silly when bros insist on buying a keg of Bud Light instead of Busch Light, when Busch Light is half the price. I also love the rednecks who think its crazy to drink their crappy light beer from a can, and tell me that it is "so much better" from the bottle.
I've recently become quite fond of Genny Light for tailgates. 30 beers for 12.99.
Page 4 of 4 pages
< 1 2 3 4You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.