Yeah, and the White Sox had no plans to dismantle when they raved about Joe Borchard.
Read More...General manager Rick Hahn said it’s too early to consider rebuilding the White Sox, although there was an interesting development Monday night.
Second baseman Gordon Beckham started at shortstop in his third game on a minor league rehabilitation assignment for Triple-A Charlotte.
...“We haven’t altered our plan since we left spring training, which was if we’re in a position to contend, we’ll add,” Hahn ...
Login to Join (2 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.6043 seconds, 126 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Double-Spin Mechanic posted on December 27, 2012 at 09:06 AM # hit 0 | hit 0#2: Stay classy
Screw you AJ and screw you Eddings.
While I agree that Paul has undeservedly gotten off easy from Halos fans, considering how poorly he handled that play, Eddings most definitely warranted their ire.
A.J.? Not so much. He made a heads-up baseball play.
As to the larger question, there's no reason the Sox fans should have anything but warm memories of Pierogi.
Well, for starters, he got the call wrong. Paul caught it.
Second, despite protestations to the contrary, his hand signal was very similar, if not identical, to the ones he'd made on previous strikeouts. The 8 Angels in the field had every reason to interpret his hand signal as Strike 3.
But that excuse doesn't work with Paul, however, since he couldn't have seen the gesture Eddings made (Eddings was behind him). And based on A.J.'s delayed reaction, it was obvious that Eddings' verbal reaction was not similar to previous Strike 3s. Thus, Paul should have known that there was some uncertainty on the part of Eddings (even if he himself was certain he caught the ball), and simply applied the tag, as many catchers routinely do on balls near the dirt, rather than blindly tossing the ball toward the mound.
You know me so well.
I don't agree that the photos are conclusive vis a vis a catch/non-catch but ymmv.
I also remember umps being asked about the visual signal and saying it was appropriate but that might be my hazy, homerist memory.
Anyway, it was a funked up play, regardles.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.