Read More...The Yankees just can’t catch up to all these injuries. Less than two weeks after he returned from a fractured right forearm, Curtis Granderson suffered a fractured fifth metacarpal (left hand) in his left hand when Cesar Ramos hit him with a pitch in the fifth inning. No word on a timetable for his return, but it’s same injury Alex Rodriguez had last season. He missed six weeks. Crud.
Granderson, 32, actually stayed in the game to run the bases before being removed the game after the ...
Login to Join (1 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 2.9084 seconds, 153 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) posted on December 08, 2012 at 12:34 PM # hit 0 | hit 0I guess you can't rule out the Dodgers, but that doesn't sound like a deal anyone would make.
And agree w/ #2 more than #1. I wouldn't cut off negotiating w/ Cano just b/c he asks for an Arod contract. I'd tell him to go out there and find his market value, and then come back to me when he realizes it's not what he thought it was.
And agree w/ #2 more than #1. I wouldn't cut off negotiating w/ Cano just b/c he asks for an Arod contract. I'd tell him to go out there and find his market value, and then come back to me when he realizes it's not what he thought it was.
That's what I basically mean by not negotiating. Just say, "We're not coming close to that. Give us a call if you want to discuss something in the 5-6 year range".
I wouldn't give him an offer to shop to other teams.
Not sure what the relevancy of Boras is, as usual. Do players who aren't represented by Boras sign for less than market value?
And I'm sure Cano wants an Alex Rodriguez contract. I'm also sure the Yankees want to sign him for 3/45 with some team options. Negotiations always start in dreamland and work from there. He'll probably end up with somewhere around 7/150-160.
Free agency is dead. Yes, some stars will still hit it while in or just past their prime, but relatively few, and it simply is not something teams can bank on as a method for building. That's why the "Oh, next year's free agency class will include X, Y, and Z stars" columns are silly.
Wrong.
This is an overstatement. The huge deals that the few star FA's attain will entice some of the other impending free agents to not sign extensions prematurely. E.G. Felix Hernandez and Cano might look at the huge sums of money that Ryan Braun and Jered Weaver are missing out on in comparison to the deals that Hamilton and Greinke get.
I don't think that is a new thing. It has always been better to develop superstars of your own rather than pay the premium to bring them in from outside your organization when they are at peak or slightly past. The Nationals didn't choose the Werth method rather than the Braun method - they didn't have a Braun.
The "new thing" is extending players who are already under contract for several more years out several more years. Take the Longoria situation:
6 years/$17.5M (2008-13), plus 2014-16 club options
6 years/$100M (2017-22), plus 2023 club option
The Rays had club options on Longoria from 2014-2016, picked those up, and then signed him through 2022. They had him for 1 more year already plus 3 years at their option, they didn't have to pick up the 2015-2016 options until 11/2014, and yet they picked those up right now and then obligated themselves for 6 more years.
Yes I agree it is new how frequent it is happening and the length of the extensions. But I don't think it will be universal enough to render free agency dead as we know it.
Does anyone know if this was common in the 80's? I'm thinking of Boggs, Ripken, and Gwynn. Did they reach their first free agency and re-up with their team or were they extended earlier?
This was a "You're under contract for 4 more years if we want you. Let's say yes to that now and sign you to a second contract for another 6 years for after this first one expires."
There is still a market price implied in all the pre-FA contracts that are signed. They are good for a lower bound as is, and it shouldn't be too hard to make an estimate of what kind of discount they contain, especially if you have a sample of players signing contracts at varying times before they hit free agency..
Of all people, Ryan Howard might have been the first one. The Phils already had him under contract for 10-11 but signed him for 12-16 in April 2010 anyway. Oops.
As to the death of free agency ... to quote Frank Zappa (on jazz): it's not dead, it just smells funny. It's certainly true that it will be a pretty dead market over the next 5+ years because almost everybody great is tied up. But it seems tome that most of these long-term deals are at relatively bargain prices* and, if that continues, then eventually more will take the risk and go FA. Certainly the MLBPA isn't going to sit idly by and watch players get a declining share of revenue but it looks to me (without seeing the books or telling the future of course) that will be the case if this continues (along with draft restrictions, luxury tax, etc).
* However I'll admit it's difficult to tell what is a bargain price (and what is market value) when guys are getting 5-7 year extensions 2-3 years before they're eligible for FA. We need a much better handle on long-term injury/collapse risk. I have little doubt that a healthy Longoria will be worth at least $100 M from 2017-22 (given inflation ... assuming there's anybody left unsigned to drive inflation :-) but I don't have that good of an idea how healthy he'll be in 2017.
I think a study projecting what value star players at 25 have typically provided from 26-35 would be very useful in analyzing this. I'm sure the teams have done them.
Yet another Captain Obvious article, offering us insights that, gee, we could never figure out on our own...
This source of yours probably said the same thing about Grant Desme, and look what happened to him!
Compare that to, say, Ozzie Smith. Ozzie was a very well-paid HOFer during his Cardinals days, but even so, the pay wasn't so high that he could simply live off the money without using his brain. (It was reported last week that he selling off lots of his stuff, like Gold Gloves, to raise cash).
I took a quick look at how much money Longoria is guaranteed now, even if the Rays don't pick up his 2023 option - it's over $130 million. Add to that that he's already made abut $8 million in his first four years, and I think a guy like Longoria sits there and says, "Why risk something crazy happening so I can go from, say, $130 million to $200 million?" It's just too much guaranteed money to say no, and the team feels like it is worth the savings to keep a cornerstone player.
I think this is a good thing for baseball, by the way.
Spanning Multiple Seasons or entire Careers, From 1901 to 2012, For players in the saved report : (Spanning Multiple Seasons or entire Careers, From 1961 to 1994, From Age 22 to 25, (requiring onbase_plus_slugging_plus?125 and At least 500 games), sorted by greatest Adjusted OPS+: Results), From Age 26 to 35, sorted by greatest Adjusted OPS+
Using the hitters list, the OPS+ sort hides a few "sins." Strawberry 3200 PA, Burroughs 3500, Lezcano 2200, Hart 1600, Cedeno 4000, Callison 4300. The pitchers' list has plenty of short careers but we expect that plus teams aren't signing their young pitchers to 15-year extensions.
Presumably the "delicate" step in all this is figuring out when to "double down". Buying out arb and FA years is obvious and has been pretty standard practice for a good player since at least the Hart Indians. It's the second extension, years ahead of when it's required, that is the new step.*
Taking some cherry-picked names from the hitter's list:
Dick Allen, personality issues aside, might have gotten the Votto treatment and be signed in Philly through age 40 -- wouldn't have worked out too well. Allen's rookie year was a 162 OPS+ at age 22. At ages 24-25 he put up 181 and 174. He'd have gotten a big arb/FA buyout at 23, through age 28-29. He did miss 40 games at 25 but had 152 games and a 160 OPS+ at 26 to allay any concerns and I'm guessing that's when the extension offer would arrive. Today's comp is Cabrera who got an 8-year extension at age 25. Allen's post-25 WAR was "just" 29. If only signed through 35, that wouldn't be too bad ... if signed through 40, that would be pretty disastrous with them spending about $100 M in today's money for absolutely nothing. By comparison, Cabrera is at 27 WAR in the first 5 years of his deal.
Yaz -- this one is all about timing. If you make the second offer after his age 25-26 seasons, you get a steal. If you wait for age 27, that was 12 WAR, MVP, triple crown, 193 OPS+ and his buyout price is through the roof. If they wait, he definitely gets the Votto treatment. He put up a ridiculous 59 WAR from 26-35. He even tacked on another 12 WAR in the next 5 years. This would have worked out well for the team under any buyout scenario. Modern comp (at young ages) ... Jason Heyward?** Among those already bought out? Ryan Braun?
Cedeno -- Say hello to Mike Trout, v 1.0. 162 OPS+ with 55 steals, a GG and 8 WAR at age 21, roughly repeating that season at age 22. He gets the arb/FA buyout after age 21 (2+ years service time) covering through age 27. Ages 23-25 are definitely a step back but he still puts up over 15 WAR. You've got to double down on that and it's gonna be expensive. Turns out to be a bad idea -- that extension covering ages 28-35 at a cost in the range of $120 to $160 M produces just 9 WAR. Among the buy-outs, Kemp is probably the closest comp but not really.
Santo -- Longoria. That works out fine as the Cubs get 66 WAR for $145 M. But the last 6 years (most of the double down) look pretty ugly at $96 M for 12 WAR.
To simulate the decision teams are making today, it might be better to look at to what extent does performance through age 25/26/27 (when the double down bet is made) predict performance from ages 29-35 (the period covered by the second extension). Most of the guys in that list did really well during those ages although Frank Thomas at 24 WAR over those 7 years is probably about the break-even point (given you're probably talking about money in the $15-20 range and the team wants some discount value). Yount and Raines and double-down candidate Vlad Guerrero fall just below that around 22 WAR. Dawson, Banks (late start), Griffey, McGriff, Belle, Cepeda and W Clark would have been losing bets but not disasters (16-19 WAR). Lynn at 14 WAR is probably where it starts to really hurt, especially if you waited until after his age 27 season to tie him up. I'm guessing they would not have doubled down on Boog anyway but just 12 WAR in those 7 seasons ... but then Mo Vaughn got a nice juicy FA contract for his 11 WAR. Then you get into Cedeno et al.
Tulo's the guy who doesn't really fit into your list. The comps which spring to mind are Ripken and Trammell (because they're white!) and they did quite well at 37 and 32 WAR ages 29-35.
*I keep calling it new because I don't recall it happening before but, I'll be honest, I don't recall the contract history of guys like Bagwell, Biggio, Helton, Chipper. It seems to me that those post-FA extensions were usually signed in the offseason before the last year of their current contract but maybe I'm wrong. Unfortunately Cot's seems to have disappeared Chipper already but Helton's big extension did come in March 01 on a contract that ran through 2002 so maybe it's not as unusual as I think.
** If you ever need reminding about how much baseball has changed since Yaz's day ... his top age 24 b-r comp is Delmon Young.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.