Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
First, the AL East does not have a dominant team. The Blue Jays and Rays appear to be better than the Yankees, but it’s unlikely either is going to run away from the pack.
This it the big deal. I don't see anyone running away with this division, there's a ton of parity. And Cashman always seems to find a way to get a decent player for basically nothing in trades, so if the Yanks have glaring holes, they may be able to fill it. I'm not ready to dance on their grave just yet.
Justice: Yanks may have injuries, but they know how to win
Is it 'score more runs than your opponent'? Then I also know how to win. Doesn't mean that I (or they) will be succesful in doing so with any regularity in 2013.
First, the AL East does not have a dominant team. The Blue Jays and Rays appear to be better than the Yankees, but it’s unlikely either is going to run away from the pack.
This it the big deal. I don't see anyone running away with this division, there's a ton of parity.
I understand the sentiment. But I'd guess that when all is said and done, we will see the normal 25ish games difference between the last place team and the first place team. I think it is unlikely for everyone in the division to be clustered between 78 and 86 wins, even if right now I have no idea which of the teams will be higher and lower than that range.
8.SG posted on March 06, 2013 at 12:26 PM #hit 0 | hit 0
Yeah, I think you'll see some team in the division win 95 games and some team win 70. But I have no idea who I'd put in those two spots. Right now probably Toronto and Baltimore but that could change tomorrow.
The 1965 Yankees knew how to win too. Until they didn't.
10.zack posted on March 06, 2013 at 03:24 PM #hit 0 | hit 0
The Yankees still have 39 year-old Derek Jeter, 43 year-old Mariano Rivera and 41 year-old Andy Pettitte, too.
The Yankees added 34 year-old Kevin Youkilis, 36 year-old Travis Hafner and 39 year-old Ichiro Suzuki, all respected pros.
Doesn't necessarily mean anything, but the first thought that jumped out to me was man, these are old guys. And the first 3 all have yet to play a game.
Doesn't necessarily mean anything, but the first thought that jumped out to me was man, these are old guys. And the first 3 all have yet to play a game.
Nothing the Yankees do this year will surprise me. They could lose 90 games or win 90 games and I wouldn't blink.
Didn't someone do a study of older players, and whether they won more than they were 'supposed' to? You'd probably have to go by projections, and add in baseball IQ (correlated to SB%, success in advancing first to third on singles...), and something else I'm doubtless forgetting.
Doesn't necessarily mean anything, but the first thought that jumped out to me was man, these are old guys. And the first 3 all have yet to play a game.
Yeah, they've all been good enough that it seems silly to think they'll implode, but talking them up like their age is a positive seems... odd.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Drew (Primakov, Gungho Iguanas) posted on March 06, 2013 at 10:39 AM # hit 0 | hit 0This it the big deal. I don't see anyone running away with this division, there's a ton of parity. And Cashman always seems to find a way to get a decent player for basically nothing in trades, so if the Yanks have glaring holes, they may be able to fill it. I'm not ready to dance on their grave just yet.
I'm always ready to do it, just biding my time.
I'm always ready to do it, just biding my time.
Shooty, I'm picturing a flamenco. Am I right?
Naw, always and forever The Robot.
Is it 'score more runs than your opponent'? Then I also know how to win. Doesn't mean that I (or they) will be succesful in doing so with any regularity in 2013.
I understand the sentiment. But I'd guess that when all is said and done, we will see the normal 25ish games difference between the last place team and the first place team. I think it is unlikely for everyone in the division to be clustered between 78 and 86 wins, even if right now I have no idea which of the teams will be higher and lower than that range.
Doesn't necessarily mean anything, but the first thought that jumped out to me was man, these are old guys. And the first 3 all have yet to play a game.
Nothing the Yankees do this year will surprise me. They could lose 90 games or win 90 games and I wouldn't blink.
Have I missed something? This seems about as likely as an unpredicted Solar eclipse on my birthday.
Yeah, they've all been good enough that it seems silly to think they'll implode, but talking them up like their age is a positive seems... odd.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.