Read More...When welterweight Floyd Mayweather was No. 1 on Sports Illustrated’s Fortunate 50 last year—knocking out Tiger Woods, who had been No. 1 every year since SI started producing the list in 2004—it looked like a fluke, the result of the $85 million he received for his fights with Victor Ortiz and Miguel Cotto. Now Mayweather is proving that he belongs at the top. From just two bouts this year, one earlier this month and the other scheduled for September, he will earn at least $90 million, ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.3142 seconds, 184 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 1 of 4 pages
1 2 3 4 >I'd go with the Sheldon Cooper analogy if he had referenced a Star Trek character or scenario, though.
THIS. THIS. THIS. SO MUCH ####### THIS!!!
It's pretty clear that Greinke would be diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder if he were growing up today. Most people with ASDs report that idle chit-chat makes their skin crawl. He's not really being a jerk here, but just being honest. IMHO.
I can talk for hours with friends and family, but trying to maintain basic communication with individual strangers (or "acquaintances" at work) is something that I despise.
My number one response to "Hey! How's it going?" when I pass someone in the hall is "Hey!" and I keep walking.
My wife is my social connector for parties and gatherings, as I'd rather not just stand around and talk about banal subjects (weather! kids! politics!).
Everyone hates fake small talk. Not all small talk is fake. I imagine there's a wealth of academic literature on this.
For some of us, small talk doesn't really exist, because meeting new people or learning about others is REALLY EXCITING. I don't say, "How are you?" Because I'm terrified of silence, but because "hey here is somebody, let's learn about them because people are fun, and then we'll interact because interacting with people is AWESOME and people are interesting and gosh it is exciting to talk to other people, I wonder what we will talk about next maybe they have some cool hobby or interest that we share?!?!?!"
In other words, entering a room full of people is like being a ten year old boy and entering a dinosaur museum.
(Edited for autocorrect)
With me (and probably some other people) it had the exact opposite of the intended effect - it was a barrier to friendship. Small talk is a useful first step towards more meaningful connections.
That's not too surprising. There is a slim chance that you and I are the same person suffering from an acute personality disorder and posting under different accounts. My parents did name me after a Pope.
It would explain why every now and then I get logged off of BTF.
EDIT: I should add, as per Cabbage, that I find meetinig new people is often a very fulfilling experience. I just really, really suck at it.
But this is BTF. Please rethink.
We were debating whether to tell you;)
It's funny since my daughter was diagnosed how often I see autistic traits evidenced by my friends, family and obviously myself. It's funny when the traits aren't crippling or overwhelming, and it just makes us socially awkward at times. His traits help make Greinke "quirky" and interesting, but he's still able to function "normally' in society.
And it's why they call it a spectrum, there is a range of behaviors under that umbrella and many of us have one or two. It only becomes awful when you have so many of the traits in a combination that makes communication and life more difficult. And terrifying when it happens to a little child whom you lose the ability to reach.
2. DEAN PELTON: Boys' night!
ABED: I need help reacting to something.
Oh goody, found out I was autistic today.
Please refer to comment #4
I tried that once on a first date, just to see what would happen. It didn't work one bit. The eye contact, I think, is the creepiest part; it makes you look like you're interrogating someone.
For some of us, small talk doesn't really exist, because meeting new people or learning about others is REALLY EXCITING. I don't say, "How are you?" Because I'm terrified of silence, but because "hey here is somebody, let's learn about them because people are fun, and then we'll interact because interacting with people is AWESOME and people are interesting and gosh it is exciting to talk to other people, I wonder what we will talk about next maybe they have some cool hobby or interest that we share?!?!?!"
I'm pretty good at small talk and don't particularly dislike it, but it definitely exists for me. My issue is getting from small talk to deep talk with a smooth transition; something interesting comes up and I start geeking out on it.
Anyone trying that opener on me must be prepared for a long rant on the awfulness of February in Sweden.
I don't mind small talk much, unless it turns to TV because I watch no shows at all.
I think I have dating anxiety disorder.
I believe I read somewhere that a significant portion of the population views eye contact as a form of aggression, an evolutionary trait of ours I would imagine. So the whole looking deep into their eyes thing was something one shouldn't do when trying to make a first impression. The other little tidbits I remember is that touching forms a trust and that you're more likely to get a positive answer if you ask a question while touching someone and to further increase your chances of a positive answer you should talk so that their right ear is the main ear hearing you.
Now trying pulling that off without coming of as a creepy human being.
And then we eatssss it, yes?
The modern definition of creepiness was most likely developed by the generation that exhibits the traits described here. This is enabled by the ability to bury their heads in Facebook pages and text messages or hide behind the earbuds on their iPods while the world goes by. It's a perfect synergy.
tl;dr
Shorter: Get off my lawn.
"HEY, YOU LOOKIN AT ME? YEAH, YOU, ############!"
OTOH I think that's less true if you're already in a conversation. It's eye contact with strangers that's more of a no-no.
The other little tidbits I remember is that touching forms a trust
Definitely true, as long as it's just a touch and you don't keep repeating it. There's a fine line between being an occasional toucher and being a dreaded closetalker.
One of the best and most interesting people I know has one particular habit that drives everyone up a wall: He keeps recounting his poker games to people who can barely tell a heart from a diamond. My wife and I were out to dinner with him on Friday night, and he went on without stopping about some game he had in Atlantic City for a full fifteen minutes. After we dropped him off, I asked her if she had any idea what the hell he was talking about. "Of course not," she said, "but I didn't want to be rude and tell him that, and it didn't seem to matter to him that I didn't." She is a VERY polite woman.
Lots of poker players do this. Lots of fantasy players do this as well. And people whoo used to own bookshops tend to talk about bookshops a lot.
Killing is too good for closetalkers. They are the worst.
My biggest problem is that I assume going into the conversation that nobody wants to talk about things that interest me and I don't really care about the things that interest other people. Thus why at times I fear I'm a sociopath.
I'm really not into anything that most people are. I don't watch television, I don't listen to the typical music (I interact with classical musicians a lot, but I don't listen to their typical music either!), I don't really follow any sport but baseball anymore, and talking about politics is considered impolite. So the only thing to small talk about is the weather, and that only takes a few seconds. What comes next?
My family moved frequently when I was a kid and I felt very similar to this much of the time because I'd tend to immediately reveal the intensity of my interest in a subject should someone raise it. A trait other kids, quite reasonably, found weird. As I grew up and my interpersonal frame of reference widened, I eventually realized that low-level weirdness could be an item of reciprocal interest. Recreational drug use certainly helped me get over myself. I learned I could be as tiresome, on any subject, as anyone else.
Making small talk (or anything on the getting-to-know-you spectrum) is still a conscious effort, but one I generally try to make. I think I've enough personality traits that beg indulgence that I can try and indulge others to a reasonable degree. Though I acknowledge I may just be mirroring behavior and the harmlessness of my sociopathology is merely down to my general lack of ambition.
I find this implausible. Out of trillions of oranges, the odds of that one being the most delicious is infinitesimal.
There's no sabermetrics for oranges. It really was quite good. Tasted almost like those orange slices candy.
When a real orange tastes almost like artificial orange flavor, you know it's good.
mole recipes
Proper pronunciation plays a role here.
There was a guy on my freshman hall that decided to dispense with small talk
He was probably taking Psych or Sociology 101. From Harold Garfinkel's wiki page:
Breaching experiments are experiments where "social reality is violated in order to shed light on the methods by which people construct social reality."[44] In Garfinkel's work, Garfinkel encouraged his students to attempt breaching experiments in order to provide examples of basic ethnomethodology.[45] According to Garfinkel, these experiments are important because they help us understand '"the socially standardized and standardizing, 'seen but unnoticed,' expected, background features of everyday scenes.'"
He'd do stuff like have students go home over break and treat their parents like strangers. "How are you son?" "I am feeling fine, thank you. How are your Mrs. Davis?"
Completely unsurprising to anyone who's human, the reaction to the breaking of social convention is often anger. Garfinkel found this deep and meaningful, I assume most folks just thought he was a jerk.
This can play out in all sorts of settings obviously. I used to help put on avant-garde jazz and other experimental music shows. Sometimes somebody would show up not knowing what they were getting, maybe talked into it by a friend. Certainly the music isn't for everybody so I always expected some folks who showed up to not like it. What I didn't expect was the angry reactions.
My biggest problem is that I assume going into the conversation that nobody wants to talk about things that interest me and I don't really care about the things that interest other people.
Moving to New Zealand and now Australia, I've found it very difficult to make new male friends but have generally had no problem making female friends. I hadn't realized how important sports was to forming new male friendships -- they have no interest in baseball, I have virtually no interest in rugby (I certainly can't talk about it intelligently) and negative interest in cricket. Our conversation can't get out of the starting block. It's doubly worse because a reasonably large number of them do want to talk about "gridiron" but I stopped watching the NFL ages ago.
If it's at a bar, it can be better -- we can talk about beer, women, ##### about work.
convergent evolution
when i was in the service i was diagnosed as a borderline sociopath and i see few similarities between us
most likely you are just a jerk
//that's meant in jest
//though i did receive that assessment
I'm a huge Pat Metheny fan and would have to say First Circle is on my very short list of contenders for Best. Song. Ever.
That being said, I made it through about 3 tracks of Song X before taking it off my turntable, never to return.
When I moved to England, I started out as a student, and sports didn't really figure in small-talk with men. Mostly it was about drinking, women and politics. But once I went to work, then I found my lack of interest in football (soccer) was a terrible handicap. I was interested in rugby, a bit, and could talk about Five Nations' internationals, but even though I'd built that interest at university, in the real world the number of rugby fans was much smaller.
But, in addition, another popular topic for small talk was television, either current shows or children's television of one's childhood. Having been brought up in America, I had absolutely no common ground whatsoever on this front either. Nobody had heard of Charlie Brown. Hot Wheels? Forget it. Fortunately, I'd got access to some Gerry Anderson via Thunderbirds, Supercar and Fireball XL5, so that helped, but British viewers of those tended to be a subset with whom I had little else in common. For grown-up television, I tended to watch American imports, which most people did not until the arrival of Friends, a show I never cared for.
I didn't make a new male friend until about ten years after I left university. And things got started between us by talking about rugby.
My experience of moving to the UK appears to have had two main differences
A) I was actually a big fan of British TV growing up in Canada
and
B) A baseball team started up in Nottingham about 2-3 months after I had moved here. It's done absolute wonders for meeting friends, some of whom I rarely talk about baseball with and some who are no longer on the team, but it was a great gateway. I think I'd pretty much only have university friends if it wasn't for baseball.
You're not in the bl--dy UK, you're in bleedin' England. You've been there about three years now, and you still haven't worked that one out?
Page 1 of 4 pages
1 2 3 4 >You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.