Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Notes in a Minor Key > Discussion

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 
   1. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 05:44 PM (#3211283)
Padres have the really interesting pick. It will be interesting to see if the Pirates take Sanchez and draft guys that fall for signability reasons later on. I agree, its not a bad year at all to do that, as I bet a lot of guys fall.

Do you think this is a weaker draft class than usual years? I think it definitely is for hitters, but the pitching looks fairly strong to me.
   2. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 05:49 PM (#3211298)
BA: Mock Draft has some bonus demands.

According to multiple team sources, several of the draft's best high school players blew them away when they revealed their price tags. California lefthander Tyler Matzek, the best prep prospect in the draft, wants "precedent-setting money," which is interpreted to mean that he wants to surpass the record $7 million guarantee for a high schooler given to Josh Beckett and Rick Porcello. Texas righthander Shelby Miller, previously believed to be signable for around MLB's bonus recommendations, is asking for $4 million.

New Jersey outfielder Mike Trout (upwards of $2.5 million), Texas outfielder Slade Heathcott (upwards of $2 million), Florida third baseman Bobby Borchering ($2 million) and North Carolina catcher Wil Myers ($2 million) all want top-10-pick money. Oklahoma southpaw Chad James seeks $1.75 million. Previously, Missouri righty Jacob Turner and Texas lefty Matt Purke alluded to Porcello money, while Georgia outfielder Donavan Tate will cost $6 million or more.


Bud Selig is going to be angry if teams pay that! REALLY angry! You would not like to see him angry.

[url="http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/draft2009/insider/news/story?id=4245401&acti>Keith Law's final mock draft</a>

<A HREF="http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090609&c]Jonathan Mayo's final mock draft[/url]

The signing deadline has been pushed back to August 17, because the 15th is a Saturday
   3. JJ1986 Posted: June 09, 2009 at 05:51 PM (#3211299)
Is there any chance the Mets will go over slot this year, with no pick until the 70s? I'd love to get a guy who's falling.
   4. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 09, 2009 at 05:52 PM (#3211300)
Here's what we've been using as a draft chatter spot - I don't care which one sticks.

What's going on with draft slots? Are they dropping the money this year?

Do you think this is a weaker draft class than usual years?

I think so, particularly the hitters (as you note)
   5. Jose Is The Most Absurd Thing on the Site Posted: June 09, 2009 at 05:54 PM (#3211307)
the guys who will likely be available at #4 are probably going to want to be paid like a #4 pick even though in most years they’d probably be mid-first round talents at best.


If this is true (I have no idea) at what point might there be an incentive for some team like the Pirates to just draft Keith Law with the #4 pick, not sign him, then go into next year with two high picks? Is there a "good faith" rule in place as there is with the Japanese posted players?
   6. Gamingboy Posted: June 09, 2009 at 05:55 PM (#3211309)
Bud Selig is going to be angry if teams pay that! REALLY angry! You would not like to see him angry.


SELIG SMASH!!!!
   7. JJ1986 Posted: June 09, 2009 at 05:57 PM (#3211314)
If money was tight for my organization and I wanted to avoid a signability risk, I'd just take Mike Leake. He's one of the very best pitchers in the draft and should be signable. I'd take him way before I considered Sanchez or Minor
   8. The Buddy Biancalana Hit Counter Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:00 PM (#3211324)
If money was tight for my organization and I wanted to avoid a signability risk, I'd just take Mike Leake. He's one of the very best pitchers in the draft and should be signable. I'd take him way before I considered Sanchez or Minor

Law has Leake going to the Royals at #12. I take it I should be excited about this?
   9. Shooty Survived the Shutdown of '14! Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:01 PM (#3211326)
If money was tight for my organization and I wanted to avoid a signability risk, I'd just take Mike Leake. He's one of the very best pitchers in the draft and should be signable. I'd take him way before I considered Sanchez or Minor

Yeah, Goldstein has Leake going to Oakland. I'd be happy with that, I think. Anybody actually see him pitch?
   10. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:01 PM (#3211327)
   11. Shooty Survived the Shutdown of '14! Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:05 PM (#3211333)
Also, it looks like some of the mocks have Grant Green going to Oakland, too. Any thoughts there?
   12. The Buddy Biancalana Hit Counter Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:10 PM (#3211345)
Law's doing a brief chat on ESPN.com right now.
   13. flournoy Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:20 PM (#3211359)
I'm a little confused as to the point of a mock draft. Is it to say, "Ha ha, I'm so smart," if yours winds up anything close to what actually transpires?
   14. Shooty Survived the Shutdown of '14! Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:23 PM (#3211364)
I'm a little confused as to the point of a mock draft. Is it to say, "Ha ha, I'm so smart," if yours winds up anything close to what actually transpires?

I think it's just to give folks like me who have never heard of/seen these guys play have some kind of sign post for what to expect and to introduce some of the names that will be called. Also, it's just for kicks.
   15. Gamingboy Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:24 PM (#3211366)
I get this feeling that mock drafts started out one day by some reporter out of sheer boredom. Then he got most of it right, and soon everybody was doing it, in every sport.
   16. Willie Mayspedester Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:27 PM (#3211375)
I want Green but would be happy with Leake too. </A's fan>
   17. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:29 PM (#3211377)
Mock drafts: They're fun. I like reading 'em a lot more than writing 'em though.
Leake - I've seen him on TV. Looks like a future #3 (to me), but I tend to overrate pitchability types. Very polished, obviously.
Green: I'm not a fan (relative to where he'll go), but I still expect him to be a future major league regular. Reminds me of Justin Jackson, but I've no idea why.
Turner: Don't have a strong opinion. Anyone who draws favorable comps to Tim Melville can't be bad - but I'd be wary of the price tag. If my job were safe (and I liked him), I tab him in round 1 and risk not signing him, I've always got the compensatory pick to fall back on.
   18. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:30 PM (#3211378)
Jim Callis draft blog says its going to be:

WAS - Strasburg
SEA - Ackley
SDP - Tate
PIT - Sanchez

And its all up in the air after that.
   19. Tripon Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:34 PM (#3211386)
The Padres are really going to take Tate?

He seems like the hardest guy to sign in the draft. Everyone else is a baseball lifer, while Tate wants to play football as much as he wants to play baseball.
   20. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:41 PM (#3211399)
while Tate wants to play football as much as he wants to play baseball.

Honestly, I think the football stuff is just a negotiating ploy. (People in Chapel Hill hate it when I say that.)
   21. Jorge Luis Bourjos (Walewander) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:48 PM (#3211412)
Thanks, DK. It certainly looks like DD has job security.
   22. Kyle S at work Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:55 PM (#3211434)
Contra #5, why shouldn't the Pirates take one of the high upside guys with less leverage and make a take it or leave it offer? Since a) this isn't a great draft and b) they'd be picking 5th next year, it seems like it would be to their benefit to draft Aaron Crow, offer slot, and wish him good luck if he doesn't take it. Scheppers would be another candidate for this tactic except they aren't allowed to draft him. "Settling" for Sanchez seems like a mistake.
   23. Tripon Posted: June 09, 2009 at 06:56 PM (#3211437)
I think Keith Law said that Scheppers gave the Pirates his permission to redraft him again.
   24. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 07:02 PM (#3211450)
"I think Keith Law said that Scheppers gave the Pirates his permission to redraft him again."

He did, but one of the local writers here (Perrotto) said that he didn't, so it's kind of up in the air.

Sanchez is a terrible idea. I don't like him at all as a prospect, and wouldn't even burn a 2nd on him, much less #4 overall.
   25. Jorge Luis Bourjos (Walewander) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 07:02 PM (#3211454)
Brian (San Francisco)

You have to love it when Willie Bloomquist can fetch around $3 million, but a guy like Matzek can fall a little cause some teams don't want to give him an extra $1 million or so.
Keith Law

Brian wins the chat.


Awesome.
   26. Chipper Jonestown Massacre Posted: June 09, 2009 at 07:24 PM (#3211494)
The Braves have the #7 pick and as a fan, I'm hoping for the best: Zack Wheeler, Tyler Matzek, Shelby Miller, Matt Purke; but expecting the worst: Alex White or Mike Minor.
   27. Chipper Jonestown Massacre Posted: June 09, 2009 at 07:26 PM (#3211501)
Sanchez is a terrible idea. I don't like him at all as a prospect, and wouldn't even burn a 2nd on him, much less #4 overall.


The Bucs are probably trying to compound the mistake of not drafting Weiters...

What a sad organization.
   28. Tripon Posted: June 09, 2009 at 07:37 PM (#3211516)


The Bucs are probably trying to compound the mistake of not drafting Weiters...

What a sad organization.


And also skipping Buster Posey?
   29. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 07:38 PM (#3211518)
If they take Sanchez, I think I've officially lost confidence in the scouting department at a minimum.

There's a big organizational need for catchers, but christ, there are probably four or five high school kids in the second/third round who would do just as well.
   30. Tom Cervo, backup catcher Posted: June 09, 2009 at 07:41 PM (#3211526)
Law says they have a predraft deal with Sanchez.
   31. Tom Cervo, backup catcher Posted: June 09, 2009 at 07:49 PM (#3211542)
Does templesox still post here? I can't imagine him missing draft day.
   32. Ignatius J. Reilly Posted: June 09, 2009 at 07:50 PM (#3211544)
With Sanchez to the Bucs maybe theres some light at the end of the tunnel for the Braves.
   33. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 08:57 PM (#3211656)
Latest from Callis:



5. Orioles: California HS righthander Matt Hobgood.
6. Giants: Georgia HS righthander Zack Wheeler.
7. Braves: Vanderbilt lefthander Mike Minor.
8. Reds: North Carolina righhander Alex White.
   34. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 08:57 PM (#3211658)
Minor to the Braves would be fairly stunning, especially with White and Matzek on the board.
   35. Ignatius J. Reilly Posted: June 09, 2009 at 08:59 PM (#3211661)
Well screw that. BA and MLB.com saying the Braves have locked in on Minor. What a waste.
   36. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:12 PM (#3211676)
How long will the draft last tonight? I know they're going three rounds, but how long will that take approximately?
   37. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:13 PM (#3211677)
And what time do they start tomorrow?
   38. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:20 PM (#3211683)
I hate Minor! Yuck.
   39. Yeaarrgghhhh Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:22 PM (#3211686)
Hobgood to the Orioles would be surprising.
   40. flournoy Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:24 PM (#3211688)
What's wrong with Minor?
   41. Tripon Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:24 PM (#3211689)
This is going to be an odd draft for sure.
   42. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:25 PM (#3211691)
Callis says Stanford P Drew Storen will go to the Nats at 10

Hobgood to the Orioles would be surprising.

Yea, but I really like the strategy. Hobgood isn't top five talent, but he's a nice polished HS arm who could rise fast and he should sign easily. With the high upside arms they already have, adding a lower upside, but less risky arm would be outstanding. Then they can try to sign someone who slides for signability reasons later on in the draft. If that's their strategy, I think it could really pay off well.
   43. Tripon Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:26 PM (#3211693)
Isn't Storen a reliever?

Even if the Nats bullpen the worst in the majors, that seems to be a wasted pick there.
   44. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:30 PM (#3211698)
Some think Storen could start.

More Callis - Rockies are choosing between the HS pitchers available, not Mike Leake.
   45. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:33 PM (#3211699)
minor - no special pitch, no great success on the field (outside of one session w/ team usa), just blah. not a bad player, not at all, but you don't take that at 7. a moskos type.
   46. DKDC Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:34 PM (#3211701)
Then they can try to sign someone who slides for signability reasons later on in the draft. If that's their strategy, I think it could really pay off well.


I don't really get this argument. Why don't they just pick the best player at #5 AND target signability sliders in the later rounds? That's pretty much what they did with Wieters/Arrieta in 2007.

The Orioles spend almost zero in the international talent market, so the draft is just about their only avenue for acquiring talent.

That said, the Orioles have a pretty solid drafting record since Joe Jordan became the scouting director a few years ago. If he really likes Hobgood for some reason, I don't really have any reason to argue with him since I have no scouting skills and have seen none of these players.
   47. Ignatius J. Reilly Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:36 PM (#3211704)
This is great. The Braves have their highest pick in years and they're taking Chuck James. Just pop the better player. Worst case scenario results in a top-10 pick next year.
   48. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:37 PM (#3211706)
I don't really get this argument. Why don't they just pick the best player at #5 AND target signability sliders in the later rounds? That's pretty much what they did with Wieters/Arrieta in 2007.

Because you can land the pitcher you really like in round one without the hassle of a huge signing bonus/protracted negotiating period AND still get a first round talent later on. And these guys do have budgets I imagine, maybe they don't feel like they can splurge in the first AND second round.
   49. Kyle S at work Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:44 PM (#3211708)
Two weeks ago, I'd never heard of Mike Minor, but now for some reason I'm irate that the Braves might have the temerity to select him instead of Matzek (who I'd also never heard of two weeks ago).

*shrug* His numbers at Vandy don't look so hot but who knows. I'd sure rather have Alex White. At least I'd heard of him!
   50. DKDC Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:47 PM (#3211714)
I think it's a little dangerous to expect that there will be much in the way of elite talent on the board by the time they pick again at #54 overall.

The #5 pick has tremendous value because it allows the Orioles to pick from the top of a pyramid-shaped talent pool (even if this pool is flatter than others). If they pick a lower-level talent with their first pick, they are basically forfeiting that advantage.
   51. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 09:59 PM (#3211724)
KLaw says the Tigers will take Matzek
   52. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:07 PM (#3211734)
Callis says the Royals are eyeing Grant Green, Will Myers and Chad Jenkins.

The A's, if they are willing to spend money, will have a lot of good players to choose from.
   53. Yeaarrgghhhh Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:08 PM (#3211735)
Yea, but I really like the strategy. Hobgood isn't top five talent, but he's a nice polished HS arm who could rise fast and he should sign easily. With the high upside arms they already have, adding a lower upside, but less risky arm would be outstanding. Then they can try to sign someone who slides for signability reasons later on in the draft. If that's their strategy, I think it could really pay off well.

That makes sense. There's something to be said for maximizing your budget, esp. in a draft like this where there's so little separation between the players after SS (and maybe Ackley). If you think Hobgood is 99% as good as Wheeler, but will cost a lot less, the money you save can be spent on other guys who fall in later rounds.

I also tend to think that people make too much of players being "overdrafts." A player is overdrafted only if he wouldn't have been available at your next pick. If you really like some player and he won't be available for your next pick, just take him. Put another way, at the end of the day a scouting director has to trust his own judgment about a player's value, and can't be a slave to the conventional wisdom.
   54. Yeaarrgghhhh Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:10 PM (#3211736)
That said, the Orioles have a pretty solid drafting record since Joe Jordan became the scouting director a few years ago. If he really likes Hobgood for some reason, I don't really have any reason to argue with him since I have no scouting skills and have seen none of these players.

Yes -- I think he's earned the benefit of the doubt.

The #5 pick has tremendous value because it allows the Orioles to pick from the top of a pyramid-shaped talent pool (even if this pool is flatter than others). If they pick a lower-level talent with their first pick, they are basically forfeiting that advantage.

I think you're understating the "flatness" of this draft.
   55. The John Wetland Memorial Death (CoB) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:10 PM (#3211738)
wow ... seligula really knows how to fire up a crowd!
   56. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:14 PM (#3211739)
A Ben McDonald sighting!
   57. cardsfanboy Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:15 PM (#3211740)
why waste time if they had already made their choice
   58. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:17 PM (#3211742)
Nats take Strasburg. Surprise!
   59. Justin T., Director of Somethin Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:18 PM (#3211744)
If teams are being asked to wait the full 4 minutes so MLB Network can give useless analysis of every pick, they are going to lose this viewer quickly. Games start in 40 minutes.
   60. The John Wetland Memorial Death (CoB) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:19 PM (#3211745)
is that jay buhner at the M's table?
   61. The John Wetland Memorial Death (CoB) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:21 PM (#3211748)
[59] seriously, this is utterly uncompelling.

not to mention, watching the whole thing means watching seligula come to the podium another 98 times.

pass.
   62. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:22 PM (#3211750)
Mariners take OF Dustin Ackley, UNC
   63. Orange & Blue Velvet Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:23 PM (#3211752)
George Brett mention.

No pressure, Ackley.
   64. cardsfanboy Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:23 PM (#3211753)
not to mention, watching the whole thing means watching seligula come to the podium another 98 times.

pass.
Page 1 of 1 pages


agree, but what I do is have mlb.com running on a browser, minimized and listening to it, while I continue to surf the web. I was afraid I was going to have to go to my tv with the cable box, but mlb.com is giving it away for free (smart move of course)
   65. cardsfanboy Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:25 PM (#3211756)
somehow my draft got lost, but for those who don't know, MLB.com is airing the same thing as MLBTV, so you can just go to mlb.com, minimize the window.


Tate taken, so far post 18 has been accurate.
   66. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:25 PM (#3211757)
Padres take OF Donovan Tate, Georgia HS
   67. Orange & Blue Velvet Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:26 PM (#3211758)
Austin Kearns? Really? On the same level as Sabathia and Lidge?
   68. Forsch 10 From Navarone (Dayn) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:28 PM (#3211760)
The Padres are really going to take Tate?

He seems like the hardest guy to sign in the draft. Everyone else is a baseball lifer, while Tate wants to play football as much as he wants to play baseball.


I wonder if they're punting the pick and angling to get two high choices next year, when the draft figures to be deeper.
   69. flournoy Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:29 PM (#3211761)
Dude thinks the Pirates need to take someone who can get there quickly. Uhh... why?
   70. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:29 PM (#3211763)
Pirates take C Tony Sanchez, Boston College
   71. flournoy Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:31 PM (#3211768)
I don't know much of anything about Sanchez except what I just heard the talking heads say, but I will assume it was a terrible pick, since it was the Pirates.
   72. Tike Redman's Shattered Dreams Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:31 PM (#3211769)
Dude thinks the Pirates need to take someone who can get there quickly. Uhh... why?
Everyone knew whom they were going to pick, so they were trying to look smart.
   73. Yeaarrgghhhh Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:35 PM (#3211773)
I apologize in advance to Vlad, but is Sanchez a better or worse pick than Moskos?
   74. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:37 PM (#3211775)
Orioles take RHP Matt Hobgood, California HS
   75. Swedish Chef Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:38 PM (#3211776)
but is Sanchez a better or worse pick than Moskos?

At least he's not a reliever.
   76. Dingbat_Charlie Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:38 PM (#3211777)
Hobgood is a thick fellow. He looks like an orc. that's my official scouting report.
   77. Jorge Luis Bourjos (Walewander) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:40 PM (#3211779)
Indians take RHP Ricky Vaughan, California Penal
   78. Swedish Chef Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:40 PM (#3211781)
He looks like an orc.

So that's what the draft tracker meant by "tremendous mound presence"....
   79. The John Wetland Memorial Death (CoB) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:43 PM (#3211785)
Hobgood is a thick fellow. He looks like an orc. that's my official scouting report.


Heh, I've been wanting to call him "the goblin" since he was linked to the yankees in a mock draft.

good to see the nickname fits the face ...
   80. Swedish Chef Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:46 PM (#3211789)
The Braves select mediocrity.
   81. Dingbat_Charlie Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:47 PM (#3211790)
mlb network talking heads on Minor:

"ignore the scouting report on this guy. and throw out the stats."

sheesh.. throw both out at #7 overall?
   82. Swedish Chef Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:48 PM (#3211791)
Minor is the first player the chirpy A's twitterer doesn't laud.
   83. The John Wetland Memorial Death (CoB) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:50 PM (#3211794)
HAH! take that callis!
   84. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:52 PM (#3211795)
Giants take RHP Zach Wheeler, Georgia HS

Braves take LHP Mike Minor, Vanderbilt

Reds take RHP Mike Leake, Arizona State
   85. Ignatius J. Reilly Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:54 PM (#3211797)
This mlb network "commentary" is absolutely terrible. Is there a pick that they don't like? I guess there was a directive that the MLB's channel wasn't allowed to criticize its franchises.

And what the hell does Harold Reynolds know about amateur talent?
   86. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:55 PM (#3211800)
BTW, this new time sucks. I can clear my work schedule to watch the draft. I cannot clear my "eating dinner with my family" to watch the draft.
   87. rLr Is King Of The Romans And Above Grammar Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:55 PM (#3211801)
And what the hell does Harold Reynolds know about amateur talent?

He took all the prospective first rounders to lunch at Applebee's.
   88. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:55 PM (#3211802)
Tigers take RHP Jacob Turner, Missouri HS
   89. Dingbat_Charlie Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:56 PM (#3211803)
And what the hell does Harold Reynolds know about amateur talent?

it seems silly that they've got Callis but he isn't sitting there commenting on every pick.


this seems like a serious run of signability picks.
   90. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:59 PM (#3211806)
Nats take RHP Drew Storen, Stanford University
   91. flournoy Posted: June 09, 2009 at 10:59 PM (#3211807)
Who's the blowhard on the right named Frank?
   92. Tripon Posted: June 09, 2009 at 11:01 PM (#3211809)
Frank Marcos, MLB claims he's a scouting director for MLB.
   93. Darren Posted: June 09, 2009 at 11:03 PM (#3211811)
Hey guys, I'm a big idiot. Where can I go and "see" the draft happening live online?
   94. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 11:04 PM (#3211812)
Rockies take LHP Tyler Matzek, California HS
   95. Swedish Chef Posted: June 09, 2009 at 11:04 PM (#3211813)
   96. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 11:08 PM (#3211816)
Royals take RHP Aaron Crow, Fort Worth Cats
   97. flournoy Posted: June 09, 2009 at 11:10 PM (#3211818)
I don't trust a word that the analysis guys say.
   98. BeanoCook Posted: June 09, 2009 at 11:12 PM (#3211822)
Nobody "needs" to sign.
   99. Darren Posted: June 09, 2009 at 11:14 PM (#3211825)
Thanks Chef.
   100. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 09, 2009 at 11:15 PM (#3211826)
A's take SS Grant Green, USC
Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Guts
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Syndicate

Page rendered in 0.6679 seconds
42 querie(s) executed