User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.1146 seconds
44 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. afoster Posted: October 13, 2006 at 04:42 PM (#2209763)We did not include Kemp and Drew because they both exhausted their rookie status during the 2006 season, with 154 and 209 respective at-bats. Our lists are composed of players who will enter 2007 with rookie status. Along with Kemp and Drew, guys like Lastings Milledge (166 at-bats), Hayden Penn (58.0 innings over the last two seasons), and Matt Garza (50.0 innings) also did not qualify for our lists.
For reference, here's Major League Baseball's official rule on rookie status:
We are not using the 45 day part of the rule, which is usually most applicable with relief pitchers.
I don't have any particular problem with excluding non-rookies from discussion of prospects, as long as that caveat is clearly stated up front. Personally, I find it hard to exclude someone who doesn't yet have a major-league job nailed down, like Milledge or Kemp, from the prospect discussion. B.J. Upton was dropped from prospect-dom after he lost his rookie status in 2004, but he was in the minors for a year and a half after that, not yet a bonafide major leaguer, and I think he should have been in the discussions, because it seems frankly crazy to me to say that someone like, say, Shawn Riggans or Ben Zobrist is a "prospect" but Upton isn't. But that's just me, and it's probably better to draw the bright line than the fuzzy one, because it makes it clear who's in and who isn't.
-- MWE
I was reading your HWB dicsussion...great stuff. I'll definitely be around -- I'm a big fan of BBTF.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main