Tuesday, January 06, 2015
But what does this have to do with… oh.
Bill, I saw an early return on a few (under 100) HOF ballots online, and Smoltz has over 75% needed to get in. Schilling has under 75%. Would it surprise you to see Smoltz get in ahead of Schilling?...
Well, I would certainly vote for Smoltz over Schilling. If you compare them as starting pitchers Schilling is ahead, but he wins by an NBA score. . . .98 to 93, or 102 to 97, something like that. If you put Smoltz’ three seasons of top-shelf relief pitching into the equation, I think he beats Schilling. In overtime.
What are the parameters in estimating improvement in MLB play over decades? For example, in sports that are measured quantitatively (track, swimming, weight-lifting, etc.) we know that runners have not improved their times in the 400 meter dash by 200% over the last few decades but that new records have been set, and we can eyeball what that improvement has been. Can we use a variety of comparative measures, not necessarily from these sports but including them, to estimate the ranges of improvement in MLB, or is it all just guesswork and BS and bias?
It’s not easy. The problem with the “parallel track” assumption is that the time line doesn’t match. The improvements that have taken place in track and field from 1960 to 2010 may have occurred in baseball from 1876 to 1920. (Certainly it is obvious that there was vast improvement in skills in baseball from 1876 to 1920. . .less obvious what the improvements have been since then.) Also, improvement in a complex set of skills is not parallel to improvement in a simple, direct skill such as runnin’ real fast or picking up something heavy. Baseball requires a mix of 100 or more highly refined skills. All of those improve at different speeds, and improvement in one waits on improvement in the others. One cannot learn to hit a 92 MPH breaking pitch until a significant number of people are around who can THROW a 92 MPH breaking pitch in the strike zone. We can work on the problem and gain some insight, but I’m not confident that we can measure improvement in baseball skills relative to other activities.
Bill, I dont remember if youve been asked this before? Do you support the pitch clock for pitchers? I think there should be a 30 second limit from when the pitcher receives the ball. And you?
I don’t know that a CLOCK is necessary. DIscipline is necessary. Stop calling timeout when there is no REASON to call time out. ALlow the umpire to call a “ball” when the pitcher dawdles. Skip the clock; it’s just discipline.
Hey Bill, It’s 1959 and you’re transported back to the Kansas City A’s owner’s office. You have one day to talk with him and the GM to try to impart as much as you can to them with the goal of trying to create a Kansas City A’s dynasty in the 1960s and beyond. Without naming names or saying stuff like “go trade for that young 1st baseman on the Giants”, that is, teaching them how to fish instead of giving them a fish, what are the things you would tell them to look at or to do? What are your priorities to get across to them to turn their club around?
The number one thing, certainly for THAT organization, is to get them to understand that player development is a process that takes time and requires patience. 1959 is a little bit too late to save that franchise. In 1959 they had no farm system to speak of. Connie Mack’s old farm system from Philadelphia, that moved to KC in ‘55, was way behind the time, and didn’t produce anything from 1955 to 1959. There is nothing you can do with nothing; you can’t trade your way to a pennant if you have nothing to start with, so the first thing you have to do is build a farm system. By 1959 that process was underway but slow. By 1963, with the hiring of Hank Peters, their development system started moving, and by 1967, when they left for Oakland, this was producing talent. So if you could move that process forward by 4 years, from 1963 to 1959, that would have helped, and if the organization had shown more patience with young players like Lou Klimchock, Nelson Mathews, Manny Jimenez, Bill Bryan, Fred Norman and others, that would have helped, and if you put those two things together, we could have moved the clock back to where the organization was rolling in 1964, rather than in 1968.
Hey Bill, did Brian Giles just become the best player ever to get zero Hall of Fame votes?
Frank Tanana. It was in the New York Times this morning. Same article mentioned my name. . ..thanks to whoever wrote that.
The District Attorney
Posted: January 06, 2015 at 05:28 PM | 36 comment(s)
hall of fame
Sunday, January 04, 2015
Monday, December 22, 2014
Friday, October 10, 2014
In an offseason in which baseball has committed itself to speeding up the pace of games, several players told ESPN.com this week that players want “a voice” in this process and they’re concerned that, so far at least, no one except the players’ union has asked them what they thought.
“Players are very interested in being involved in these discussions,” veteran pitcher Kevin Slowey said. “We just want to be part of a collaborative effort to address these issues. And we want to have a voice. We don’t want to overpower any other voices. We’d just like to have our voice heard.”
Posted: October 10, 2014 at 12:10 PM | 80 comment(s)
Wednesday, October 01, 2014
1. Hitters must keep at least one foot inside the batter’s box at all times, barring exceptions like foul balls, wild pitches, or if the umpire grants him time out.
2. Pitchers must throw a pitch within 20 seconds of receiving the ball. Clocks posted in each dugout will count down the 20 seconds.
3. There will be a maximum break between innings of 2:05, with a clock keeping track. Hitters must be in the batter’s box by 1:45. If the hitter’s not ready, the umpire can call a strike. If the pitcher doesn’t throw a pitch by 2:05, the umpire can call a ball.
4. Teams will have a maximum of 2:30 to change pitchers, with the clock starting as soon as the reliever enters the playing field.
5. Teams are limited to a maximum of three mound visits per game, not including pitching changes. This applies to trips to the mound by managers, coaches, and catchers.
6. Pitchers no longer have to deliver four balls for an intentional walk. The manager can simply signal to the umpire.
Joyful Calculus Instructor
Posted: October 01, 2014 at 04:00 PM | 127 comment(s)
Thursday, September 11, 2014
How that isn’t a plate block I have no idea. This was not one of those “the runner is out by 20 feet” plays the clarification is aimed at changing. This was going to be a close play if Drew had a chance to slide into the plate. But where was Stephen Drew supposed to go?
After the game, Joe Girardi said that, if the calls are going to be like that, his instructions to his base runners would be “Run him over. Bottom line: Run him over.”
I watched this a few times, I have no idea what the right call is anymore. Hanigan is blocking the plate. The throw beats him by a fair margin. “Clearly beaten”? Who knows. I can’t wait for this rule to decide a playoff game.
Robert in Manhattan Beach
Posted: September 11, 2014 at 03:37 AM | 31 comment(s)
Monday, September 08, 2014
Major League Baseball and the Players Association are nearing an agreement designed to “clarify” confusion over the new home plate collision rules, sources told ESPN on Monday, with an announcement possible as soon as Tuesday. [...]
Primarily, the clarification of Rule 7:13 would remind umpires that while the intent of the rule was to protect catchers from violent collisions at the plate, the wording was not intended to be interpreted so strictly that it would allow runners to be called safe on a technicality if the throw had beaten them to the plate by a substantial margin.
Posted: September 08, 2014 at 08:45 PM | 16 comment(s)
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
: UPDATE: X-rays confirm fractured left forearm for Giants' Hunter Pence, out 6-8 weeks - Giants Extra
(7 - 2:48am, Mar 06)
Last: Joyful Calculus InstructorNewsblog
: Pictures of New Ballpark Food Items « Ben's Biz Blog
(22 - 2:22am, Mar 06)
: Minor's absence opens opportunities for Stults | braves.com
(3 - 2:07am, Mar 06)
: 'Boring' Cardinals know how to win
(13 - 1:57am, Mar 06)
: OTP - March 2015: You’re out, tobacco: Bill would ban products at all California baseball venues
(713 - 1:50am, Mar 06)Last:
: OT: Monthly NBA Thread - March 2015
(310 - 1:14am, Mar 06)Last:
Fourth True OutcomeNewsblog
: Arbitrator will decide whether Josh Hamilton should enter rehab - ESPN Los Angeles
(70 - 12:02am, Mar 06)
Last: Sunday silenceNewsblog
: Positive Howard looking forward, not behind
(34 - 11:53pm, Mar 05)
Last: Walt DavisNewsblog
: Joe Posnanski's Top 100 Players: No. 40: Eddie Collins
(44 - 11:49pm, Mar 05)
: Bryan Price wants Reds to run like Pete Rose
(43 - 11:10pm, Mar 05)
Last: Walt DavisNewsblog
: Ethier must prove his worth in crowded outfield | MLB.com
(10 - 11:02pm, Mar 05)
Last: Walt DavisNewsblog
: ‘I thought the bat looked slow': Scouts on A-Rod | New York Post
(26 - 10:59pm, Mar 05)
Last: bbmckHall of Merit
: Most Meritorious Player: 1902 Ballot
(21 - 10:45pm, Mar 05)
: David Wright’s stand is how Mets foster Yankees-like intensity | New York Post
(8 - 10:12pm, Mar 05)
Last: Howie MenckelNewsblog
: OT: NBC.news: Valve isn’t making one gaming console, but multiple ‘Steam machines’
(1592 - 9:11pm, Mar 05)Last:
Random Transaction Generator