User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.4047 seconds
54 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Boxkutter Posted: February 16, 2012 at 12:29 AM (#4062146)That said, I have no hard feelings toward AJ. Given what #2 said, that seems like a perfectly good reason to turn it down.
I can't really blame Huntington on that one.
I can't really blame Huntington on that one.
Seriously. Why in the world would a team in the Pirates' position give up a useful talent for a guy who's both expensive and not likely to be any good when the team gets good again (yeah, I know--chortle away)?
Of course, that kind of raises the question of why the Bucs are interested in Burnett at all.
You gotta overpay for the intermediate guys to get the top guys to sign with you. Look at the Royals. Everyone was critical when they signed Gil Meche, but now the top tier free agents are lining up at their doorstep.
Someone has to throw innings next year. MLB owners are far from patient... at a certain point, even if the organization is making steps forward (which I think the Pirates have been and are), all it takes is a 62-100 season for an owner to get annoyed and push to fire the GM. Draft slot when you're not at the very bottom is not all that important, so it's better to try to actually win games if it can be done with no long term consequences (and Burnett seems to satisfy that constraint).
Pirates should have a pretty good defense next year, Burnett had good peripherals in the second half of last season. If they have the money to burn, why the hell not?
Yes, clearly it would be impossible to drive her from the East Coast to California. The dream is still alive that one day there will be an automobile that will allow people to pack up their belongings and drive from coast to coast and settle down in a new city, but until then...there's Pittsburgh.
She doesn't want to live in California.
No point in helping the Angels either. They could be WC competition.
(dons a black hoodie, appearing somewhat like the Emperor and/or the Grim Reaper)
ALLAN JAMES BURNETT. YOU HAVE TWO CHOICES! YOU WILL GO TO THE WORLD SERIES CONTENDER LOS ANGELES ANGELS OF ANAHEIM, 2000 GENE AUTRY WAY, ZIP CODE 92806, ORANGE COUNTRY, CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NORTH AMERICA, NORTHWESTERN HEMISPHERE, PLANET EARTH, SOL SYSTEM... OR YOU WILL GO TO PITTSBURGH!"
I'd rather live in Pitssburgh.
Edit: Gamingboy, close your bolding.
Maybe, don't know it. I might also consider California, PA, home of the hilariously titled California University of Pennsylvania.
Abreu's OPS+ over the last 2 years: 118, 104
Burnett's ERA+ over the last 2 years: 82, 86
Which of them is looking toasty? Honestly, I really don't see how A.J. Burnett helps anyone get closer to a pennant. According to Baseball Reference he's got .6 WAR over the last 2 years. I realize FanGraphs likes him a bit better, but he's gone through long stretches over those last two years when you just didn't want him going anywhere near the mound.
Now, he's a head case, so it's possible he'll go to someplace like Pittsburgh and pull it back together when there's no pressure or spotlight on him so he might be worth a flier from them, but if I were the Angels, I wouldn't want him.
Burnett's ERA+ over the last 2 years: 82, 86
Which of them is looking toasty?
You have to look at peripherals as well as results.
Abreu's power is gone, 112 ISO last year. He BABIP is 30 pts below his career level. I just don't think he hits the ball hard enough any more. When pitchers figure it out, the walks will go, and he'll be useless.
I'd rather give the ABs to Russell Branyan.
edit: Nope, I guess.
EDIT: Don't know why I thought I could fix what everyone else couldn't.
Remember kids, drugs are bad.
edit--Damn you Monk!
In honor of the Angels' proud tradition of power-hitting prospects who disappoint spectacularly, they can have the retroactive rights to Brad Eldred and J.R. House.
Yup.
EDIT: #36, the problem with putting in tags by hand. He had used square bracket b
There are a lot of syntactically valid ways of getting bold text, and the people who'd tried so far hadn't guessed that one.
There's also an Indiana University of Pennsylvania, located, of course, in Indiana, PA. Funny folks, those keystoners.
(Both of which are near Bird-in-Hand and Blue Ball! In Amish Country!)
Oh Pennsylvania, the source of my maternal heritage..
Ah, CUP... Chuck Berry's favorite institution of higher learning.
In that vein, I always regretted that Intercourse, PA and Climax, MI weren't closer together.
Amazing that he got ZERO HOF votes in 2002, his best season by OPS.
You must have a incredibly low standard for brilliance. $/WAR would say Abreu was worth just about what he was paid for the remainder of his contract and the Phillies got absolutely nothing in return for him. Even at the time, the players the Phillies got were not really considered great prospects.
Abreu w the Phillies: 47.0 WAR Salary: 64 million
Abreu after the Phillies: 11.8 WAR Salary : 51 million
Someone here is confused. I will give you a hint, it's not me.
The fact that the Angels overpaid him has nothing to do with the Phillies. All that matters is what he did while he was under the contract he was on when the Phillies traded him. The Yankees paid $35.4m for 7.3 WAR(~$4.8M/WAR), not great, but not terrible. Certainly worth more than what the Phillies got in return, which was nothing. Even if you want to argue that the Phillies traded him at the right time, they still got NOTHING in return. So yes, you have a very low standard for brilliance or you have no clue what you are talking about.
Hey! Didn't Dennis Rodman go to Southeastern!
hey now.
consensus among CA peeps i know is negative. but it is on the BART, so you can run to SF whenever.
It's not a quick commute on BART. Having lived in both the East Bay and Allegheny County, the burgh with the h is a far more pleasant place to live. Also, it has a street layout about as symmetrical as Berkeley's.
I always found Miami University of Ohio to be a bit jarring. And severely deficient in bikinis.
Is kind of near Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
It's not a quick commute on BART.
It's a hell of a ride though. You get on the train at Market Street, and when you get off at Pitt/Bay Point, it's like the train dropped you off on another planet.
You get the same feeling with the train to Richmond. But in that case, you may actually be on another planet. And not a very nice one.
Having lived in Ohio, I'm going to argue that it's not deficient enough.
Yes to both - I usually take BART to court in either place, and from downtown SF it feels like you've traveled a lot further than an hour.
It's really nice when the train comes out from underground, and empties out. The scenery's not great, but it is diverting.
As a group, free agents are overpaid relative to their economic value by a significant amount. ~1/3 before calculating "extra" value (for instance if a signing is the difference between making or missing the playoffs it's pretty much always an economic winner, and in general the costs of the first year are (probably) offset by increased demand created by the signing.
All that to say that while you're talking across from each other to an extent, your point that they couldn't have signed him more cheaply is valid -- he's been paid very close to what you'd expect to pay for somebody of his talents. But his point that they're very likely ahead of the game financially for not having done so is equally valid.
Well of course everyone would choose Pittsburg over Newport Beach.....
You were there the wrong time of the year if you missed the bikinis. Miami of Ohio is named after the Miami tribe, which lived in the area. The Miami River runs south through Dayton and near Oxford before emptying into the Ohio River west of Cincinnati. Miami, Florida is supposedly named after the initial deed on the swamp purchased by two guys from Hamilton, Ohio, although that is disputed.
Ummmm .... not sure what this says about Mrs. Blanston.
Can we all agree that Oakland (CA or PA) is right out?
Whoever they sign will probably be cut by July, so why hurry.
I can't be the only one who finds this a shockingly shitty deal for the Pirates, can I?
I'd assume they're under MLBPA pressure to raise payroll. As of now, the payroll only projects to about $45M. Plus, the rotation is very thin.
Assuming the prospects are worthless, it's probably a good deal for Pittsburgh to add some rotation stability (Burnett will probably be a 1.5-2.0 WAR pitcher for them) at $6-7M p.a., and placate the MLBPA.
Unless they believe they've spotted something. Always possible that Burnett has a correctable mechanical problem (though the track record on this point is generally not good)
I don't disagree with your general point. However, you misunderstood me. I simply said that the Phillies shouldn't be called brilliant for dumping Abreu for absolutely nothing in return. He produced value that was near enough to what he was paid on that contract after he was traded. That means the Phillies traded an asset that had some value for absolutely nothing in return. I don't see how that can be called brilliant.
The contract he signed with the Angels is utterly irrelevant to judging the trade the Phillies and the Yankees made.
He misunderstood you because you've been playing with yourself too much, and besides, being at least as expensive as the then current $/WAR isn't "an asset that had some value", it's having something that has no value, since it doesn't bring anything that can't readily be gotten on the market.
No, it's irrelevant only because you want it to be. I wrote,
See, "his career" means "his career". I know that baffles you, but that's your problem. His career means, among other things, "What the Phillies paid him" and "What all other teams paid him". The Phillies got the heart of Abreu's career and left it to other teams to pay for his decline phase. You need to do some basic studying if you have yet to realize that paying book value and worse is not a winning strategy. It's in fact the most expensive way of putting together a team, which is precisely what the teams who had Abreu, post Philadelphia, were doing in acquiring him.
I'll repeat myself:
See, that's Abreu's career. His career, while he was with the Phillies and after. The Phillies timed his departure brilliantly. Given how difficult it is to time these things, getting rid of a player on a HOF-like career path and how bad that can make you look, during his age 32 season, when even statheads have trouble grasping that's not typically a player's decline phase, I'm happy to stand by my characterization.
You've chosen to be an argumentative, nitpicking idiot for reasons the rest of us can't fathom, but once again I was talking about Abreu's career, the entirety of his career, and you want to prattle "All that matters is what he did while he was under the contract he was on when the Phillies traded him", because apparently you like picking fights with people on the internet by pretending they wrote things they didn't.
It's pitiful, frankly.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main