Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, April 10, 2001

A Little Help From His Friends

From what I’ve read, Bill James doesn’t like being referred to as a “statistician”. If that is indeed true, I’m sure he won’t like the beginning of this piece.

Jim Furtado Posted: April 10, 2001 at 11:54 AM | 3 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags:

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Robert Dudek Posted: April 10, 2001 at 07:43 PM (#66650)
Calling Bill James a statistician is like calling Stephen Hawking a technician.

What Bill James is is a thinker. He just happens to think a lot about baseball.
   2. Robert Dudek Posted: April 10, 2001 at 07:43 PM (#67107)
Calling Bill James a statistician is like calling Stephen Hawking a technician.

What Bill James is is a thinker. He just happens to think a lot about baseball.
   3. Robert Dudek Posted: April 10, 2001 at 07:43 PM (#67893)
Calling Bill James a statistician is like calling Stephen Hawking a technician.

What Bill James is is a thinker. He just happens to think a lot about baseball.
   4. scruff Posted: April 10, 2001 at 09:17 PM (#66651)
I haven't read past the first two paragraphs of the article, and this author already had me steamed. Excuse me if he explains himself later, but my impulsive personality drove me immediately to comment. It DRIVES ME INSANE when people slam the QS because in it's worst case scenario you can get one with a 4.50 ERA.

As James himself explained when introducing the stat (it was awhile ago, but this is how I remember it anyway), you can get an RBI while hitting a weak grounder to short with a man on 3rd. But if you get a 140 of them in a season, the odds are you didn't get too many that way.

Almost always, the league leaders in quality starts are the top pitchers in the league. Of course the stat is influenced by ballparks, etc. It is not a "precision metric" but an "eyeball metric" that is pretty solid at what it was designed to do; I'll bet the top 10 in QS are better than the top ten in Wins almost any year.

W/BBRef on the DL right now I can't run numbers to back my argument up (on W vs. QS) but I'm fairly confident I'm right here.
   5. scruff Posted: April 10, 2001 at 09:17 PM (#67108)
I haven't read past the first two paragraphs of the article, and this author already had me steamed. Excuse me if he explains himself later, but my impulsive personality drove me immediately to comment. It DRIVES ME INSANE when people slam the QS because in it's worst case scenario you can get one with a 4.50 ERA.

As James himself explained when introducing the stat (it was awhile ago, but this is how I remember it anyway), you can get an RBI while hitting a weak grounder to short with a man on 3rd. But if you get a 140 of them in a season, the odds are you didn't get too many that way.

Almost always, the league leaders in quality starts are the top pitchers in the league. Of course the stat is influenced by ballparks, etc. It is not a "precision metric" but an "eyeball metric" that is pretty solid at what it was designed to do; I'll bet the top 10 in QS are better than the top ten in Wins almost any year.

W/BBRef on the DL right now I can't run numbers to back my argument up (on W vs. QS) but I'm fairly confident I'm right here.
   6. scruff Posted: April 10, 2001 at 09:17 PM (#67894)
I haven't read past the first two paragraphs of the article, and this author already had me steamed. Excuse me if he explains himself later, but my impulsive personality drove me immediately to comment. It DRIVES ME INSANE when people slam the QS because in it's worst case scenario you can get one with a 4.50 ERA.

As James himself explained when introducing the stat (it was awhile ago, but this is how I remember it anyway), you can get an RBI while hitting a weak grounder to short with a man on 3rd. But if you get a 140 of them in a season, the odds are you didn't get too many that way.

Almost always, the league leaders in quality starts are the top pitchers in the league. Of course the stat is influenced by ballparks, etc. It is not a "precision metric" but an "eyeball metric" that is pretty solid at what it was designed to do; I'll bet the top 10 in QS are better than the top ten in Wins almost any year.

W/BBRef on the DL right now I can't run numbers to back my argument up (on W vs. QS) but I'm fairly confident I'm right here.
   7. scruff Posted: April 11, 2001 at 12:16 PM (#66653)
Sean C., the situation you describe is not a quality start. It isn't because the definition is 6 innings or more, 3 runs (earned?) or less. I think on the fringe of a quality start it could go either way, but overall, it's a solid eyeball metric.
   8. scruff Posted: April 11, 2001 at 12:16 PM (#67110)
Sean C., the situation you describe is not a quality start. It isn't because the definition is 6 innings or more, 3 runs (earned?) or less. I think on the fringe of a quality start it could go either way, but overall, it's a solid eyeball metric.
   9. scruff Posted: April 11, 2001 at 12:16 PM (#67896)
Sean C., the situation you describe is not a quality start. It isn't because the definition is 6 innings or more, 3 runs (earned?) or less. I think on the fringe of a quality start it could go either way, but overall, it's a solid eyeball metric.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
greenback changed his travels
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogDellin Betances' lost case against the Yankees shows the arbitration system is broken | FOX Sports
(11 - 5:34am, Feb 20)
Last: pezzonovante

NewsblogOT - December 2016 NBA thread
(2138 - 2:45am, Feb 20)
Last: maccoach57

NewsblogBryce Harper isn’t laughing off Syndergaard’s ‘douche’ rip | New York Post
(9 - 11:49pm, Feb 19)
Last: sinicalypse

NewsblogHosmer talking extension, but prepared for breakup of Royals’ core
(4 - 11:46pm, Feb 19)
Last: sinicalypse

NewsblogOTP 13 Feb. 2017: Football and Politics
(2307 - 11:29pm, Feb 19)
Last: madvillain

Hall of MeritWillie Davis
(33 - 11:03pm, Feb 19)
Last: Kiko Sakata

NewsblogYankees President: Dellin Betances’ Arbitration Filing “Had No Bearings In Reality”
(42 - 10:05pm, Feb 19)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogCarter Capps Delivery Is New, Still Basically Against The Rules
(32 - 9:56pm, Feb 19)
Last: the Hugh Jorgan returns

NewsblogJose Fernandez's absence a significant presence as Marlins open spring training - (AUTOPLAY)
(2 - 9:48pm, Feb 19)
Last: AT-AT at bat@AT&T

NewsblogAfter rough debut, Lucas Giolito aims for encore with White Sox
(1 - 9:39pm, Feb 19)
Last: sinicalypse

NewsblogRemember 1967 and the impossible dream - The Boston Globe
(11 - 9:39pm, Feb 19)
Last: Ziggy: The Platonic Form of Russell Branyan

NewsblogHeyman: Cardinals And Yadier Molina Have Preliminary Extension Talks
(5 - 9:05pm, Feb 19)
Last: Ziggy: The Platonic Form of Russell Branyan

NewsblogPadres' 'all-in' Dominican push shaping franchise future - The San Diego Union-Tribune
(3 - 8:16pm, Feb 19)
Last: Cargo Cultist

NewsblogYordano Ventura’s final year filled with family turmoil, emotional distress
(2 - 8:12pm, Feb 19)
Last: Cargo Cultist

NewsblogA’s Khris Davis won’t play in WBC, discusses love for Oakland - San Francisco Chronicle
(1 - 8:11pm, Feb 19)
Last: Cargo Cultist

Page rendered in 0.3041 seconds
46 querie(s) executed