|
|
|
|
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to robneyer for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: OMNICHATTER for May 19, 2013 (64 - 6:29pm, May 19)Last: botemanNewsblog: Draft Features Rarest of Prospects: Redheads (83 - 6:28pm, May 19)Last: Greg (U)KNewsblog: Hal Steinbrenner calls tickets 'affordable' (16 - 6:27pm, May 19)Last: Dag Nabbit has the talking pillowNewsblog: MLB hoping for large replay expansion in 2014 (50 - 6:24pm, May 19)Last: Ray (RDP)Newsblog: [OTP-May] Politico: Congressional baseball game, May 1, 1926 (3335 - 6:14pm, May 19)Last:  Greg (U)KNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread - May 2013 (946 - 6:11pm, May 19)Last:  tshipmanNewsblog: Murray Chass: ARE RED SOX REELING ALREADY? (11 - 6:00pm, May 19)Last: Ray (RDP)Newsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread, May 2013 (884 - 5:53pm, May 19)Last:  Arnett Mead (Arjun)Newsblog: Holmes: Where does Miguel Cabrera rank among Tiger greats? (33 - 5:45pm, May 19)Last: TJNewsblog: SoE (Megdal): It's Time to Finally Believe in the Orioles (25 - 5:35pm, May 19)Last: Walt DavisNewsblog: Cafardo: Dustin Pedroia the best second baseman in MLB? (89 - 5:30pm, May 19)Last: Ray (RDP)Newsblog: Weiner: The Supreme Court Judge and the Curt Flood Case reenactment (2 - 1:17pm, May 19)Last: bobmNewsblog: BtBS: Kevin Gregg Re-emerges in Chicago (3 - 1:00pm, May 19)Last: rlcNewsblog: Hochman: Dallas Green still tells it like it is (8 - 12:20pm, May 19)Last: bobmNewsblog: Hold tight on that Moreland Express | Dallas-Fort Worth Sports News - Sports News on the Dall... (3 - 12:06pm, May 19)Last: SG
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Athletic Supporter gangnam style Posted: September 24, 2012 at 11:19 PM (#4244765)And look out. Adam Dunn is close to cockblocking Miggy's bid for the Triple Crown.
I knew that the Rangers would have a good shot at winning if Ross came into the game.
Edit - Coke to Athletic Supporter
With Tyson Ross pitching, I'm not sure it really mattered.
Heh, two cokes.
Hamilton hit his 43rd tonight to move back into the HR lead.
You're not joking about that. The Jays winning percentage against AL contenders goes from .222 (4 and 14 vs Tampa) to .500 (4 and 4 vs LA):
TM W L WPATL 1 2 .333
BAL 6 10 .375
CHW 4 6 .400
DET 2 4 .333
LAA 4 4 .500
MIL 1 2 .333
NYY 5 9 .357
OAK 4 5 .444
TBR 4 14 .222
TEX 3 6 .333
WSN 0 3 .000
Until that grand slam, I was quite certain the Orioles were going to win the nightcap.
I still say they're pretty much a lock for the playoffs, I figure they should clinch the second wild card this weekend against Boston (that'll be nice for the home fans, to get to see them celebrate on the field, instead of on TV).
O's had a nice, funny "thank you fans" video on the big board today. I wonder if they'll play that all home stand.
It would be much nicer to clinch the AL East this weekend. It's a bit of a tall order - they can only afford one loss OR one Yankee win. They are probably going to clinch in Tampa or back in Baltimore for game 163.
So Teagarden is only useful in extra innings then???
Runners at 2nd and 3rd, nobody out in the bottom of the 6th, down by a run, Jones/Davis/Reynolds due up, facing a reliever who has struggled recently, in the second game of a doubleheader... not sure that's an instant "pinch run for your catcher at third" situation. I'm mean, you're usually going to have not only two decent shots at a deep sac fly there, but three chances at a simple hit to score the run. I guess Teagarden's not much of an upgrade over Luis Esposito, so that's an argument in favor of the move... but subbing Esposito at that point, with Weiters off limits due to the doubleheader, you remove the ability to pinch hit for the catcher later in the game, which isn't an unlikely scenario in a close game, and would likely provide a greater marginal upgrade than pinch running.
Of course, you could have said the same thing about RDP last season (or me, in August) so there's always that risk, but it's a nice change from the typical reverse jinx silliness.
Of course there’s a chance that the O’s collapse and miss the playoffs, but am I really going to feel better about that if I acted like the world’s biggest pessimist for the last 10 days of the season? I don’t think being able to say “I told you so” will make that feel any less crappy.
The Yankees have a small advantage in the standings right now. The Yankees are probably a more talented team (although I don’t think I’d concede that point if Markakis and Hammel were healthy). The Yankees probably have easier opponents, but they have a tougher travel schedule.
But, it’s only a week’s worth of games, so just about anything can happen. My (figurative) money is on the young, hungry team that has shown incredible resilience all year and has come up big in tougher spots than this.
They're in. Enjoy the next week.
Agreed. I was cautious early in the season. I told one friend that the Nationals were for real but that I wasn't sure about the O's. I told my wife that I thought it was more likely that the O's would collapse than the Jays even though the O's were in first place at the time. But as the season progressed, I've become more and more impressed with this team. They've fixed holes. They've found capable starters. They've survived injuries. They're still winning with string and bailing wire, but at least it's no longer smoke and mirrors. For now, this is the most fun I've had watching baseball in a long, long time. I'm enjoying it. I'm excited about it. Plus, with this young core and the prospects on their way, the future doesn't look too bad either.
I don't think there's anything wrong with bringing in Blevins and Neshek as LOOGY/ROOGY. They're both better than Straily in those situations.
I would have much rather seen Scribner or Miller than Ross in the 9th, assuming Balfour and Doolittle were unavailable.
Blevins needed to be throwing strikes in that situation, is what I am thinking.
Doesn't this suggest that even a pinch-runner may have not scored there?
I think your approach is reasonable, but so was Buck's in this case. And unless the one run magically inspires Buck to remove Arrieta and prevent the grand slam, it's probably moot anyway.
I think the more important question is, why won't the Jays lose when you finally want them to?
One of the best lines I've read in a long time.
I agree with this, but ... if you are Bob Melvin, and you have made up your mind on availability, and you apparently know that if you pull Straily you're going to need to bring in Tyson Ross in the 9th (surely the game did not change state in a way FAVORING the entrance of Ross), you bite the bullet and keep Straily in now so you don't have to use Ross at all. You don't get to the 9th inning and be like "well, ####, I guess I have to use Ross now." Also, I know what actually happened, but 2 outs and nobody on in the 7th up 2 is not that high leverage a situation, would rather have the good relievers out there to start an inning. ####, bring in Tyson Ross in that situation and pull him when he gets in trouble, don't do it ass-backwards.
I don't even want to consider the possibility that there exist some advanced analytics somewhere pushing the team to use Ross in any high-leverage situation. Math is great, but it's not that great.
No, seriously, let's go.
The Jays put together what has to be the least impressive 13 hit game in baseball history, but it looks like a blowout in the box score.
The Yanks take a 3-1 lead.
The division is starting to slip away, but its still in play. I'd feel better if the angels lose.
LOUDER!
EDIT: That having been said, I think pulling Hughes in the right move there. Not Girardi's fault that the guy who's killed lefties this year has been brutal tonight.
Still an annoying loss though. Never like to give up a lead late. I stand by the sentiments in #47.
I was listening to the game on the radio while driving home, and Jeff Nelson was absolutely torching Logan, basically saying that after Martin didn't block that wild first pitch that he was afraid to throw his breaking ball low in the strike zone.
Not exactly feeling comfortable here.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main