|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Friday, November 07, 2008
I’ll show you the Bonilla right here, Klap!
There were a lot of reasons for the failures of those early nineties Mets teams, but Bobby Bonilla wasn’t one of them. He wasn’t the perennial MVP candidate the Mets hoped they were getting when they opened the vault to bring him to Shea, but they really should have known that all along. His numbers weren’t those of a terrific hitter. A very good hitter, sure, but his production at the plate paled in comparison to those of his former Pittsburgh teammate Barry Bonds. The Mets thought they were getting more than just a ballplayer in Bonilla, and perhaps that’s where the biggest evaluative failure lies. Bonilla was being paid like an outstanding hitter even though everyone knew—even at the time—that he was merely a very good hitter whose personality was supposed to bridge the gap between goodness and greatness. When it didn’t, the backlash was aimed at Bonilla instead of the more appropriate target, Al Harazin.
Bonilla is best remembered for his massive contract (that the Mets continue to bear the financial burden of), and is most often thought of unfavorably as a result. The reality is that the Mets shoved that money in front of Bonilla and he took it, and all he could manage in return was to be the best hitter the Mets had in each of the four years he served with them from 1992 through his deadline trade to the Orioles midway through the 1995 season. Bobby Bonilla wasn’t a great player, but he was a very good player, even if he couldn’t quite live up to the lofty expectations placed on him.
Repoz
Posted: November 07, 2008 at 03:17 PM | 11 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags:
history,
mets
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Greenberg: Cubs' Ricketts decries proposal (816 - 8:59pm, May 25)Last:  Sam Hutcheson is the Rickey Henderson of...Newsblog: Boston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff (112 - 8:55pm, May 25)Last:  hokieneerNewsblog: HP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind (55 - 8:48pm, May 25)Last: SquashNewsblog: Matschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon? (16 - 8:43pm, May 25)Last: EbessanNewsblog: Bud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN (85 - 8:37pm, May 25)Last: Harveys WallbangersSox Therapy: A Winning Ballclub? (19 - 8:32pm, May 25)Last: Jose Can You SeabiscuitNewsblog: Wilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment (7 - 8:28pm, May 25)Last: asinwreckNewsblog: TBO: Nerdy Rays head north (11 - 8:24pm, May 25)Last: TriponNewsblog: Himrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods (5 - 7:42pm, May 25)Last: Cyclone AlleyHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion (14 - 7:33pm, May 25)Last: Kiko SakataNewsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 5-25-2012 (48 - 7:04pm, May 25)Last: AndrewJNewsblog: T.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer (4 - 6:45pm, May 25)Last: AndrewJNewsblog: OT: Soccer Thread—May 2012 (1164 - 6:35pm, May 25)Last:  The DA Baracus HypothesisNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012 (1831 - 6:31pm, May 25)Last:  Srul ItzaSox Therapy: Minor League Thread: 150 PA Prospects (25 - 5:47pm, May 25)Last: Matt Clement of Alexandria
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. There are no words... (Met Fan Charlie) Posted: November 07, 2008 at 05:53 PM (#3004898)I'm doing a similar list for the Royals though, and its been pretty embarrassing who makes their top 50. Brent Mayne. That's right. Brent Mayne.
This always reminds me of Bill James talking about how he got the idea for the abstract while arguing that Mike MacFarlane was one of the top 100 catchers of all time. It's amazing how guys you thought were meh were actually pretty damn good historically. Of course, if I did a top 50 Oakland A's I might be horrified by who made the list. Bill Caudill? Mike Gallego? Jeff Newman? Wayne Gross?
He probably wouldn't make my revised list, though I still don't totally regret having him on there because he was a lot of fun to research (as most of these guys are, legends or otherwise).
Among Mets with 2000+ PAs, he's 2nd in Avg, 3rd in OBP, 2nd in SLG, 2nd in OPS, 10th in runs, 8th in total bases, 6th in doubles, 5th in HR, 7th in RBI, 3rd in OPS+
you get the idea
* How long is it taking them to work on this list? - apparently the Wright write up was done 2/07???? Sheesh, they should take Wright down, and adjust everyone 1 slot- at this rate by the time they reach Wright again it'll be in 3-4 years and he'll be #2 behind Seaver.
That thread was .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
I didn't think then and I certainly don't think now that Rey Rey was in the top 50- or all that close to it- one of my all time most hated players...
Yea, that's on me. I didn't realize how time-consuming these would be when I started them a couple of years ago. Suffice it to say that Wright would already be higher than he was at the time, and could very well be top-20 at this point.
Plus I've been almost solely relying on Win Shares, so guys that just kinda hung around for years and played crappy - Michael Tucker, Brent Mayne, David Howard, are high on the list, while guys that were great for one year and gone - Jay Bell, Chili Davis, Paul Byrd - are pretty low.
I relied heavily on WARP3 for my list, which has its drawbacks, too. It does account for defense (and its offensive component is adjusted positionally), but FRAR is kinda suspect. Also, relying mostly on raw counts of anything undercut players who had a significant impact for a shorter period of time (e.g. simply aggregating WARP3 over his Met career doesn't give Mike Piazza nearly the credit he deserves; he's something like 12th overall). At the same time, on a team-specific list like this, longevity with the team definitely counts for something, even if it was a long period of mostly mediocrity (see: Ed Kranepool).
They're still paying that contract?
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main