Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Friday, November 07, 2008

Amazin’ Avenue: Simon: The Top 50 Mets of All Time: #34 Bobby Bonilla

I’ll show you the Bonilla right here, Klap!

There were a lot of reasons for the failures of those early nineties Mets teams, but Bobby Bonilla wasn’t one of them. He wasn’t the perennial MVP candidate the Mets hoped they were getting when they opened the vault to bring him to Shea, but they really should have known that all along. His numbers weren’t those of a terrific hitter. A very good hitter, sure, but his production at the plate paled in comparison to those of his former Pittsburgh teammate Barry Bonds. The Mets thought they were getting more than just a ballplayer in Bonilla, and perhaps that’s where the biggest evaluative failure lies. Bonilla was being paid like an outstanding hitter even though everyone knew—even at the time—that he was merely a very good hitter whose personality was supposed to bridge the gap between goodness and greatness. When it didn’t, the backlash was aimed at Bonilla instead of the more appropriate target, Al Harazin.

Bonilla is best remembered for his massive contract (that the Mets continue to bear the financial burden of), and is most often thought of unfavorably as a result. The reality is that the Mets shoved that money in front of Bonilla and he took it, and all he could manage in return was to be the best hitter the Mets had in each of the four years he served with them from 1992 through his deadline trade to the Orioles midway through the 1995 season. Bobby Bonilla wasn’t a great player, but he was a very good player, even if he couldn’t quite live up to the lofty expectations placed on him.

Repoz Posted: November 07, 2008 at 03:17 PM | 11 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: history, mets

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. There are no words... (Met Fan Charlie) Posted: November 07, 2008 at 05:53 PM (#3004898)
And by the time he came back to Flushing ('99), only Rickey could draw to an inside straight any better...
   2. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: November 07, 2008 at 06:07 PM (#3004909)
LOL @ Rey Ordonez at #50

I'm doing a similar list for the Royals though, and its been pretty embarrassing who makes their top 50. Brent Mayne. That's right. Brent Mayne.
   3. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: November 07, 2008 at 06:15 PM (#3004919)
I'm doing a similar list for the Royals though, and its been pretty embarrassing who makes their top 50. Brent Mayne. That's right. Brent Mayne.

This always reminds me of Bill James talking about how he got the idea for the abstract while arguing that Mike MacFarlane was one of the top 100 catchers of all time. It's amazing how guys you thought were meh were actually pretty damn good historically. Of course, if I did a top 50 Oakland A's I might be horrified by who made the list. Bill Caudill? Mike Gallego? Jeff Newman? Wayne Gross?
   4. Eric Simon Posted: November 07, 2008 at 06:20 PM (#3004925)
LOL @ Rey Ordonez at #50

He probably wouldn't make my revised list, though I still don't totally regret having him on there because he was a lot of fun to research (as most of these guys are, legends or otherwise).
   5. JPWF13 Posted: November 07, 2008 at 06:23 PM (#3004934)
Wright is 40th* and Bonilla 34th?

Among Mets with 2000+ PAs, he's 2nd in Avg, 3rd in OBP, 2nd in SLG, 2nd in OPS, 10th in runs, 8th in total bases, 6th in doubles, 5th in HR, 7th in RBI, 3rd in OPS+

you get the idea

* How long is it taking them to work on this list? - apparently the Wright write up was done 2/07???? Sheesh, they should take Wright down, and adjust everyone 1 slot- at this rate by the time they reach Wright again it'll be in 3-4 years and he'll be #2 behind Seaver.
   6. JPWF13 Posted: November 07, 2008 at 06:28 PM (#3004943)
LOL @ Rey Ordonez at #50

He probably wouldn't make my revised list,


That thread was .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

I didn't think then and I certainly don't think now that Rey Rey was in the top 50- or all that close to it- one of my all time most hated players...
   7. Walt Davis Posted: November 07, 2008 at 06:56 PM (#3004972)
It's fair to say Bonilla was a very good _hitter_. It would be interesting to see how he'd grade out with today's defensive stats -- he might well have graded out as average to +1 win overall.
   8. Eric Simon Posted: November 07, 2008 at 07:10 PM (#3004981)
How long is it taking them to work on this list?

Yea, that's on me. I didn't realize how time-consuming these would be when I started them a couple of years ago. Suffice it to say that Wright would already be higher than he was at the time, and could very well be top-20 at this point.
   9. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: November 07, 2008 at 07:41 PM (#3005010)
This always reminds me of Bill James talking about how he got the idea for the abstract while arguing that Mike MacFarlane was one of the top 100 catchers of all time. It's amazing how guys you thought were meh were actually pretty damn good historically. Of course, if I did a top 50 Oakland A's I might be horrified by who made the list. Bill Caudill? Mike Gallego? Jeff Newman? Wayne Gross?


Plus I've been almost solely relying on Win Shares, so guys that just kinda hung around for years and played crappy - Michael Tucker, Brent Mayne, David Howard, are high on the list, while guys that were great for one year and gone - Jay Bell, Chili Davis, Paul Byrd - are pretty low.
   10. Eric Simon Posted: November 07, 2008 at 08:25 PM (#3005033)
Plus I've been almost solely relying on Win Shares, so guys that just kinda hung around for years and played crappy - Michael Tucker, Brent Mayne, David Howard, are high on the list, while guys that were great for one year and gone - Jay Bell, Chili Davis, Paul Byrd - are pretty low.

I relied heavily on WARP3 for my list, which has its drawbacks, too. It does account for defense (and its offensive component is adjusted positionally), but FRAR is kinda suspect. Also, relying mostly on raw counts of anything undercut players who had a significant impact for a shorter period of time (e.g. simply aggregating WARP3 over his Met career doesn't give Mike Piazza nearly the credit he deserves; he's something like 12th overall). At the same time, on a team-specific list like this, longevity with the team definitely counts for something, even if it was a long period of mostly mediocrity (see: Ed Kranepool).
   11. Hello Rusty Kuntz, Goodbye Rusty Cars Posted: November 07, 2008 at 09:35 PM (#3005090)
Bonilla is best remembered for his massive contract (that the Mets continue to bear the financial burden of),

They're still paying that contract?

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Sheer Tim Foli
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.2312 seconds
54 querie(s) executed