|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Friday, December 04, 2009
Yeah, right, and so is the Da Derga’s Hostel…but I ain’t booking no rooms anytime soon!
The only reason this debate still lives is because of the media and fans. In reality, it seems the mainstream media has also started to make peace with both sides. The fact that Zack Greinke was the Cy Young Award winner gives a nod to advanced statistics rather than simply comparing wins totals. But, for fans, there is an insistence that one method is preferable over the other. The first reason comes down to comprehension. At first glance, many of the advanced metrics are complicated statistics that take more than one glance to understand. Some may argue it takes away from the beauty of the game. However, as many have come to realize, these statistics only enhance the beauty of the game as the players’ excellence is more clearly defined. Can one understand the game without knowing a pitcher’s FIP or a player’s WAR? Sure, they can; people did that for decades. However, knowing those statistics gives a better appreciation for just how dominant a player has been.
Arguing over statistical analysis and its place in baseball is quite pointless. There is a place; there is an importance. They don’t replace scouting; they only help scouting. Statistics make scouting even better. Can people get too carried away with statistical analysis? Sure, but that’s only when the person believes that statistics are the only way to go. Essentially, that person has flipped the roles of the classic debate with those “ignorant traditionalists”. Now, the stats believer (who holds that singular belief) is the ignorant one. It is time to move on as organizations have married the two sides. It is time for the fans to get on board.
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to Randy Jones for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Boston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff (116 - 9:31pm, May 25)Last:  The DA Baracus HypothesisNewsblog: TBO: Nerdy Rays head north (12 - 9:28pm, May 25)Last: BrianNewsblog: Matschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon? (23 - 9:26pm, May 25)Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)Newsblog: Wilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment (8 - 9:25pm, May 25)Last: McCoyNewsblog: The Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime" (1 - 9:21pm, May 25)Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)Newsblog: T.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer (5 - 9:19pm, May 25)Last: Bruce MarkusenNewsblog: Greenberg: Cubs' Ricketts decries proposal (817 - 9:08pm, May 25)Last:  The Yankee ClapperNewsblog: HP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind (55 - 8:48pm, May 25)Last: SquashNewsblog: Bud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN (85 - 8:37pm, May 25)Last: Harveys WallbangersSox Therapy: A Winning Ballclub? (19 - 8:32pm, May 25)Last: Jose Can You SeabiscuitNewsblog: Himrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods (5 - 7:42pm, May 25)Last: Cyclone AlleyHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion (14 - 7:33pm, May 25)Last: Kiko SakataNewsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 5-25-2012 (48 - 7:04pm, May 25)Last: AndrewJNewsblog: OT: Soccer Thread—May 2012 (1164 - 6:35pm, May 25)Last:  The DA Baracus HypothesisNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012 (1831 - 6:31pm, May 25)Last:  Srul Itza
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Tricky Dick Posted: December 04, 2009 at 01:44 PM (#3403156)I don't believe this to be true at all. I think some organizations may be using their own versions of advanced fielding metrics, but most are probably not. I think there is still a lot of resistence to reliance on fielding metrics at the decision maker level in MLB. Less so than 5 years ago, to be sure, but definitely not all. Most likely half at most.
To some extent the 21st century developments in this vein were a product of BPro's 'hey, look at us' strategy of using snark to describe moves. You can't help but wonder if all that noise was made in order for them to get jobs with baseball teams or to become political analysts.
One of the French nouvelle vague directors (Godard, I think) more or less confessed that as far as he was concerned their auteur theory was simply a strategy to get attention. I view the 'stats vs scouts' debate in the same light.
And, of course, the media loves to make a confrontation out of a discussion. BPro, to their credit, knew this and exploited it.
I think I disagree with this actually. Where stats makes the game less fun is in identifying the huge role of luck (or "luck" or "random variation" or "yet-and-never-to-be-explained variation" or whatever you want to call it). All these dreary projection systems reminding us that even Pujols isn't as good as his stats -- shame on them!
Maybe you should get some scouts and some stats guys in a roundtable or something....
Ironically (in an Alanis Morrisette sense), the table was a rectangle.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main