Good, then he’ll be happy.
Every decision [Bobby] Valentine makes, every utterance, every laugh (Was it a chuckle or a cackle? Cutting or well-meaning?) is subject to interpretation. It’s an ongoing soap opera, and for players it is an immensely challenging phenomenon.
Al Leiter, now an analyst for the YES Network, lived through it when he pitched under Valentine with the Mets from 1998-2002…
“Anytime that a player has to answer to things that don’t relate to that player’s job and the tasks that he’s trying to perform on the field and there’s the exterior stuff, it doesn’t enable a guy to focus the way he should to be the best you can be. It’s not a good thing,” Leiter said last week. “[Players try to] ignore it.
“But then you have a cold, bitter clubhouse, because [members of the media] are trying to find answers, and [players] are trying to hide, because they know what the eventual questions are going to be. After you ask about that night’s game, the hanging slider for a double down the line, then it’s, ‘What do you think?’ Even if their answers are no comment, or whatever it is to not get in trouble, it’s still there. They know they can’t [comment honestly] because it’s a hot-button topic.”
... “Not just for him, but for people who are creative, who aren’t guarded, who aren’t careful with being themselves—[the impact of social media] applies to anybody in a position that potentially has a microphone put in front of their face. Bobby’s one of them,” Leiter said. “And then it becomes, ‘Wow, that was a little odd.’
“Cities like Boston, New York, Philadelphia, that have a number of media outlets, it probably would be better to have someone who a) knows what they’re doing as a manager but b) is less inclined to put their foot in their mouth…
“You win, there’s less B.S. If you’re winning, the numbers are right for most of the guys in the clubhouse, so guys are happy,” Leiter said.
But when the Mets ran off the rails in a 75-86 season in 2002, the balancing act no longer worked. Players could no longer brush off the controversies surrounding Valentine.
“You’re losing, so it’s already depressing. You know it’s all negative talk, so you’ve got to turn the radio off. You can’t listen to the radio, you can’t read the paper, because you know it can’t be any good. You’re 16 1/2 games back,” said Leiter. “This is a team that underperformed. I’m pissed off.
“Getting to that place, getting to that space, getting that clear mind—it’s not easy.”
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Walks Clog Up the Bases Posted: September 18, 2012 at 11:41 AM (#4239027)now THAT would be fun
But he'll remember, with advantages,
What feats he did that day. Then shall our names,
Familiar in his mouth as household words-
Bobby the King, Ciriaco and Kalish,
Lin and Carpenter, Stewart and Valencia- "
Truth!
I think this year's winning interview will be similar with the hired candidate just repeating over and over again "I'm not Bobby Valentine."
BTW where are all those Red Sox Primates who were calling for Francona's hide around this time last year?
The original post that I can find was by Matt Clement of Alexandria on July 6 in this thread. "The idea that this team "doesn't have a shot" is full-on crazy clown town. They're around 30-40% to make the playoffs."
If it's not in reference to Harper (and I'm not sure it is, because it lacks the necessary 'bro' at the end), the only other thing I can find that it might be referring to is the David Lynch song/album Crazy Clown Time, which features references to beer, wild partying, and a guy named Bobby.
Bobby screams so loud and spit
Bobby screams so loud and spit
No one around
They all run around
They all run around
Oh, it's crazy clown town!
It was really fun!
It was real fun, oh!
If it's not a reference to that, it's a good coincidence.
Was Rick Pitino too long ago to count?
Disagree completely. Firing the manager is a mistake without a succession plan. I think you have to look at old manager and new manager together.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main