Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, July 08, 2014

Ball? Strike? It Depends: Is the Pitcher an All-Star?

They would rather not talk about it, but umpires may be just as star-struck as the average baseball fan.

Two researchers looked at the photographic evidence and found that umpires make more errors in favor of All-Star pitchers than pitchers who have never been selected for an All-Star Game — about 17 percent more.

This is a subject umpires are naturally hesitant to discuss….

But the science exists, for anyone who wants to look at it. Every major league stadium is equipped with the Pitch f/x system, which includes strategically placed cameras that record the locations and trajectories of every pitch. The technology provides a record that is difficult to dispute. In the seasons the study covered, 2008 and 2009, umpires earned a B-plus average, at best, in calling balls and strikes.

The researchers — two business school professors, Jerry W. Kim of Columbia Business School and Brayden G. King of Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Management — looked at data on 756,848 pitches over 313,774 at-bats in 4,914 games. Some umpires were, unsurprisingly, more accurate than others, but on average they called a strike on 18.8 percent of pitches that were actually out of the strike zone and a ball on 12.9 percent of pitches that were, in fact, strikes.

ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick Posted: July 08, 2014 at 07:33 AM | 3 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: umpiring

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Joyful Calculus Instructor Posted: July 08, 2014 at 12:23 PM (#4746067)
Or could it be that the causation is reversed: Pitchers who throw pitches that look like strikes but are actually out of the strike zone are more likely to become all stars. Given that such a skill would be very useful as a pitcher, this would make sense.
   2. ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick Posted: July 08, 2014 at 12:49 PM (#4746100)
Some umpires were, unsurprisingly, more accurate than others, but on average they called a strike on 18.8 percent of pitches that were actually out of the strike zone and a ball on 12.9 percent of pitches that were, in fact, strikes.


And so the solution is naturally to let them keep doing this while they instigate replay for the 1% of plays on the bases that get called wrong.
   3. Walt Davis Posted: July 08, 2014 at 06:06 PM (#4746545)
But the science exists

As #1 sort of hints -- this is not science!

This is two guys adding up numbers ... which is fine although we don't need Business profs to tell use proportion of in/out calls, that's what fangraphs, etc. are for. Beyond that they seem to have done no more than simple "hey, let's compare the means of two groups."

Science is "why". They might speculate why but they have no evidence of why. And it almost surely isn't "all-star" that was just a convenient and independent measure of "quality" and "star." And the chicken-egg problem. And how did they define "error"? Was it a simple and lazy "yes/no" -- called a ball a strike regardless of how far outside the zone the pitch was?

There are zones where basically every pitch is gonna be called a strike and zones where basically every pitch is gonna be called a ball. The rest are the gray areas. Good pitchers live in the gray areas, bad pitchers will have a wider distribution of locations. If they haven't accounted for that then their finding is empty.

If half of a pitcher's balls are in a gray area then, sure, he's probably gonna get 25-30% of his balls called strikes. If only 1/4 of a pitcher's balls are in a gray area, he's probably only gonna get 10-15% of his balls called strikes.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Marc Sully's not booin'. He's Youkin'.
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOTP - 2016 February 8: There’s baseball, politics … and real problems
(1787 - 9:44pm, Feb 12)
Last: I'm not Black I'm Orange Julius

NewsblogOT: Monthly NBA Thread - February 2016
(747 - 9:42pm, Feb 12)
Last: NJ in DC (Now with Wife and Fetus!)

NewsblogOT: Soccer Thread - February 2016
(155 - 9:39pm, Feb 12)
Last: Baldrick

NewsblogAthletics acquire Khris Davis from Brewers | MLB.com
(6 - 9:19pm, Feb 12)
Last: Roger McDowell spit on me!

NewsblogJennry Mejia permanently banned by MLB for third PED test
(7 - 9:15pm, Feb 12)
Last: RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)

NewsblogBrian Kenny: HALL OF FAME'S ANTI-RECENCY BIAS
(74 - 9:14pm, Feb 12)
Last: Howie Menckel

NewsblogWrigleyville - What a Slutter Does, Has Done, and Might Do for Jake Arrieta
(8 - 7:46pm, Feb 12)
Last: Pasta-diving Jeter (jmac66)

NewsblogJacob deGrom to Mets: ‘Willing’ to do long-term deal now
(13 - 6:47pm, Feb 12)
Last: Adam Starblind

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 2-12-2016
(14 - 6:17pm, Feb 12)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogHall of Fame voters exhibit a clear anti-recency bias.
(8 - 6:02pm, Feb 12)
Last: Cargo Cultist

NewsblogMLB, players' association work together to develop more protective pitching hat
(4 - 5:53pm, Feb 12)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogMLB New data results show high school baseball similar to MLB
(2 - 4:42pm, Feb 12)
Last: Leroy Kincaid

NewsblogKeith Law: 2016 ranking of all 30 farm systems (INSIDER)
(55 - 4:07pm, Feb 12)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogThe Uncertain Timetable for Cord-Cutting in Baseball's Future
(75 - 3:56pm, Feb 12)
Last: Greg K

NewsblogThe BtBS guide to analytics tools and resources - Beyond the Box Score
(4 - 3:18pm, Feb 12)
Last: KJOK

Page rendered in 0.2429 seconds
47 querie(s) executed